Remont (modernizacja) odcinka drogi w miejscowości Stara Wieś

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific detail on evaluation criteria and financing, impacting its overall clarity and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, CPV code, and clear organization details. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could lead to procedural ambiguity. The deadline seems reasonable within the context of Polish procurement but could be tighter for complex projects.

The tender's subject matter and location are clearly defined. The availability of project documentation, technical specifications, and cost estimates enhances clarity. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Key information such as the title, organization, and submission deadline is present. The CPV code is provided, and multiple related documents are listed. However, crucial financial details like the estimated value are missing, and the contract duration is not specified, which reduces overall completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes transparency. Access to project documentation appears to be provided. No specific requirements tailored to individual companies are apparent, suggesting a fair process. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor drawback for fairness assessment.

The use of e-procurement is a positive for practicality. However, the absence of explicit information regarding the contract start date and financing details makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully assess the project's feasibility and their financial planning. No explicit e-submission instruction is mentioned beyond general e-procurement.

The tender exhibits strong data consistency, with key fields populated and logical date formatting for the submission deadline. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable procurement process.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation focus. This lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects reduces its score in this category.