Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of an internal road on plot no. 75/8 in Żygląd

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00166669/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Kujawsko-Pomorskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of an internal road on plot no. 75/8 in Żygląd

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for internal road reconstruction in Żygląd presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability in core road construction elements, competitive pricing, and efficient project delivery within the 36-month timeframe. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on meeting all technical requirements flawlessly and presenting a clear, well-structured bid is paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and efficient execution of core road construction works.

Commitment to quality and timely project completion within the specified duration.

Cost-effective solution for local infrastructure improvement.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for a focus on meeting all mandatory technical requirements to a high standard, as this will likely be the primary determinant of success.
The 36-month duration provides ample time for efficient project planning and execution, allowing for optimized resource allocation and potentially cost savings.
The relatively straightforward technical scope (standard road construction) means that bidders with established expertise in these areas can leverage their existing capabilities.
Key Challenges
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to prioritize bid elements and understand the weighting of different aspects. This necessitates a comprehensive approach, ensuring all aspects are addressed thoroughly.

Focus on excelling in all explicitly stated technical requirements and ensuring the bid is clear, well-organized, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the project scope. Assume that technical compliance and price will be the primary drivers.

Lack of information on estimated value and financial requirements means that pricing strategy needs to be carefully considered, balancing competitiveness with profitability. Overpricing could lead to disqualification or losing to a more competitive bid.

Conduct thorough cost analysis based on similar past projects and market rates for materials and labor. Benchmark against potential competitor pricing if possible. Ensure the bid is competitive but also sustainable for the contractor.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering contractor with a proven track record in road construction, particularly in Poland. The ideal bidder will possess the necessary equipment and skilled labor for earthworks, base construction, and asphalt surfacing, along with a strong understanding of local regulations and procurement processes. Financial stability and efficient project management capabilities are also crucial.
Key Requirements
Earthworks (excavations and embankments)
Construction of a crushed stone base
Construction of an asphalt concrete wearing course with a width of 3.5 m
Supplementation and profiling of existing soil shoulders
Improvement of soil shoulders with crushed stone
Submission of bid forms and declarations (DOCUMENT 2)
Adherence to draft contract terms (DOCUMENT 4)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated efficiency in project management and delivery, potentially through a detailed project schedule that highlights timely completion.
A highly competitive and well-justified price point.
Clear and concise documentation that leaves no room for ambiguity regarding technical capabilities and proposed solutions.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or sourcing of materials where feasible. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of past successful projects that align with the technical requirements. Clearly outline the proposed methodology for each stage of the construction process, demonstrating expertise and efficiency.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing strategy based on thorough cost analysis. Ensure the price is realistic and reflects the scope of work while aiming for a strong market position.

Project Management and Timeline

Present a clear and realistic project plan that demonstrates the ability to complete the works within the 36-month timeframe. Highlight key milestones and resource allocation.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly review and complete all bid forms and declarations.
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all templates in DOCUMENT 2 are filled out accurately and completely. Any omissions or errors could lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid compliance and avoids immediate rejection.
Focus on flawless technical compliance and competitive pricing.
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume that meeting all technical requirements to a high standard and offering a competitive price will be the primary determinants of success. Detail how each technical requirement will be met.

Maximizes chances of winning by addressing the most likely evaluation factors.
Develop a detailed and realistic project execution plan.
HighHigh effort

Present a clear timeline, resource allocation, and methodology for each phase of the road reconstruction. This demonstrates competence and a proactive approach to project management.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver on time and within scope.
Conduct a robust cost analysis for pricing.
HighHigh effort

Without an estimated value, it's crucial to price competitively yet profitably. Research material costs, labor rates, and potential overheads thoroughly. Consider potential risks that could impact cost.

Ensures a competitive bid that is also financially viable.
Understand the draft contract thoroughly.
MediumMed effort

Carefully review DOCUMENT 4 (Wzór umowy) to understand all contractual obligations, technical specifications, and payment terms. Ensure the bid aligns with these terms.

Prevents future contractual disputes and ensures a clear understanding of project scope.
Consider subtle social value commitments.
LowLow effort

Although not required, a brief mention of potential local employment or sustainable material sourcing (if applicable and cost-effective) could be a minor differentiator.

Slightly enhances bid appeal if competitors do not address it.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and efficient solution for the required road construction, emphasizing proven technical expertise and a commitment to timely delivery. Highlight cost-effectiveness without compromising on quality.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Earthworks (excavations and embankments)
--Construction of a crushed stone base
--Construction of an asphalt concrete wearing course with a width of 3.5 m
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88cc-8383-9f91-056e-e50001aa9a7c.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the reconstruction of an internal road on plot no. 75/8 in Żygląd, Poland, with submissions required electronically.

Dr_Żygląd_SWZ.pdfPDF
Dr_Żygląd_SWZ.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Contract Conditions (SWZ) for a public procurement procedure concerning the reconstruction of an internal road in Żygląd.

Dr_Żygląd_Zał. Nr 2 do SWZ - Wzór umowy.pdfPDF
Dr_Żygląd_Zał. Nr 2 do SWZ - Wzór umowy.pdf

This document contains the draft contract for the reconstruction of an internal road in Żygląd, detailing the scope of work, technical specifications, and contractual obligations.

Dr_Żygląd_Zał Nr od 3 do 7.7zZIP
Dr_Żygląd_Zał Nr od 3 do 7.7z

This document contains templates for bid forms and declarations required from bidders and entities providing resources for the reconstruction of an internal road in Żygląd.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for internal road reconstruction in Żygląd is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, it lacks financial transparency and specific evaluation criteria, and is not proactively addressing sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal frameworks with a specified CPV code and location. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline could be considered short given the scope. The absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria is a minor procedural gap.

Clarity80/100

The description of the road reconstruction works is detailed and includes specific technical requirements. The attached documents provide project documentation, form templates, and a contract draft, aiding clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, and description. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and a key document (SWZ) is provided, but the full scope of 'all basic info' might be impacted by the missing financial value.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and full document access, including project documentation, form templates, and a contract draft. Requirements are technically focused and do not appear tailored to specific companies. Objective criteria are implied by the technical scope, but not explicitly defined.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which enhances practicality. Document URLs are implicitly available through the tender system. Contract duration is specified. However, financing information is absent, and the lack of an explicit contract start date could be a minor inconvenience.

Financing information not disclosed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented within the tender lifecycle.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention or integrate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation initiatives. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which could be an opportunity for enhanced sustainability considerations.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical requirements
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided
Utilizes e-procurement for submission
Specific CPV code and location information

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability clauses or objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline