Skip to main content
Tenders

“Airlock” Output Checking System: OCS Decision Engine Development Partner

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
012869-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North West England
Type
Open Procedure
61
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

UKB is seeking to further improve its technical controls and intends to implement a functional mechanism to check data egress requests to ensure that participant record-level data is not being removed and does not contain information that can identify individual participants. This Output Checking System (OCS) functionality will allow UKB to enhance the security of the UKB-RAP, reduce the risk of advertent and inadvertent data breaches and importantly increase the trust and transparency of the UKB resource. UKB intends to commence a procurement exercise to procure a replacement for the current UKB-RAP in 2027, which will come into effect in 2028. The OCS will need to be integrated with the new UKB-RAP. Output checking processes for Trusted Research Environments (TREs) have to date been based on manual processes, with data analysts or administrators employed to review data egress requests to ensure they meet compliance standards. Given their reliance on human oversight of large data outputs, these systems are costly and do not provide a failsafe, and they cannot scale to the demands of UKB given its very large user base and continued growth. With over 20,000 publications (5,000 in the past year alone), a manual output checking process is neither desirable nor feasible. To develop and deliver the OCS, UKB is separating the procurement into two elements which will need to be fully interoperable: 1. OCS User Interface (UI) and Workflow (subject to a separate tender exercise via the CCS G-Cloud 14 framework): The development of a seamless UI and Workflow for the OCS, including secure movement of data and integration with existing UKB infrastructure. 2. The OCS Decision Engine (this procurement): The development of the core algorithms to allow an automated assessment of the data being egressed, giving an overall confidence assessment score and a Red/Amber/Green (RAG) rating for decision making The OCS Decision Engine The OCS Decision Engine is made up of two components: 1. Data Trust Engine: reviews the egressed file(s) from UKB-RAP to detect the presence of sensitive information. Through the application of transparent, heuristic rules and configurable thresholds, the Data Trust Engine will create a score for how ‘disclosive’ the egressed data is that, when coupled with the researcher confidence score below, provides a Red (fail), Amber (unclear) or Green (pass) egress rating. 2. Researcher Behaviour Engine: derives the overall credibility of a given researcher within AMS and UKB-RAP, and assigns a confidence score, which will dictate how human-review decisions are made for ‘Amber’ outcomes from the Trust Engine. This Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) is being issued to invite Bids for a development partner to design and deliver the OCS Decision Engine, which will include the Data Trust Engine and Researcher Behaviour Engine. The estimated contract value for the purchase of the Liquid Handlers and the provision of services as set out in this Contract Notice and for the duration described is anticipated to be £2m GBP UKB reserves the right to discontinue or delay the procurement process and may decide not to award a contract as a result of this call for competition. UKB shall not be liable for any costs or expenses incurred by any organisation in considering and/or responding to the procurement process. Tenders and supporting documents must be priced in pounds sterling and all payments made under the contract will be in pounds sterling, unless otherwise advised. UKB will incorporate a standstill period at the point the decision in relation to the award of the contracts is notified to bidders. The standstill period, which will be a minimum of eight (8) working days, provides time for unsuccessful bidders to lodge an appeal in regards to the award decisions, before the contracts are entered into. Tenderers are advised to allow adequate time for uploading documents and to dispatch the electronic response well in advance of the closing time to avoid any last minute problems NOTE: To register your interest in this notice and obtain any additional information please visit the myTenders Web Site at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=233323. A user guide is available at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/sitehelp/help_guides.aspx.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document is a contract details notice from The Sheffield College for the purchase of two minibuses, outlining the supplier, contract value, and procurement specifics.

Lot L-2HTM
L-2.html

This tender seeks a development partner to design and deliver an Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, including Data Trust and Researcher Behaviour components, to automate the detection of sensitive data egress and assess researcher credibility for UK Biobank's research platform.

Lot L-3HTM
L-3.html

UK Biobank seeks a development partner for a £2m Output Checking System Decision Engine, requiring expertise in automated data egress assessment, including Data Trust and Researcher Behaviour Engines, with this document detailing the technical specifications.

Lot L-4HTM
L-4.html

This document is for submitting the pricing proposal for the development of the OCS Decision Engine, which includes the Data Trust Engine and Researcher Behaviour Engine, with an estimated contract value of £2m.

Lot L-5HTM
L-5.html

This document is a login page for the myTenders eProcurement platform, providing instructions for access and information on cookie usage.

OCDS RecordDOC
012869-2026_ocds_record.json

UK Biobank is seeking a development partner to design and deliver an automated Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, comprising a Data Trust Engine and a Researcher Behaviour Engine, with an estimated contract value of £2m.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012869-2026_ocds_release.json

UK Biobank is seeking a development partner for an £2m Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine to automate the assessment of data egress requests, ensuring data security and participant anonymity by detecting sensitive information and evaluating researcher credibility.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012869-2026_official.pdf

UK Biobank is seeking a development partner for a £2m Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine to automate data egress risk assessment and researcher credibility scoring, aiming to prevent data breaches and enhance security.

Tender NoticeHTM
012869-2026.html

Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender clearly outlines the technical need for an automated Output Checking System but is significantly hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria and critical data inconsistencies, impacting fairness and legal compliance.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance65/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and mentions a standstill period, aligning with UK procurement regulations. However, the explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are not stated, and the inclusion of irrelevant text about 'Liquid Handlers' in the description is a serious error that could lead to legal ambiguity.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
Irrelevant 'Liquid Handlers' text included in the description.
Clarity60/100

The project's purpose, problem statement, and the two main components of the OCS Decision Engine are clearly articulated. Nevertheless, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Performance conditions could be more explicitly detailed.
Completeness65/100

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are largely provided. The core technical requirements are described. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the failure to download one of the listed documents ('Tender Notice'), which might contain essential information.

Missing evaluation criteria.
One tender document ('Tender Notice') failed to download.
Fairness55/100

The tender value is disclosed, and e-procurement is enabled, promoting accessibility. The technical requirements appear generic enough for the specified task. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the process, making fair competition challenging.

No evaluation criteria specified, significantly impacting transparency and objectivity.
Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is well-supported via the myTenders platform with a direct URL provided. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information is available, although there is a minor currency inconsistency. Overall, practical aspects are handled effectively.

Inconsistency in the currency of the estimated value (EUR vs GBP).
Data Consistency40/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a significant inconsistency in the estimated contract value, stated as EUR 2.4M in one section and GBP 2M in another. More critically, the description includes irrelevant text about 'Liquid Handlers,' indicating a copy-paste error that severely impacts the accuracy and reliability of the tender information.

Inconsistent estimated value currency (EUR vs GBP).
Irrelevant 'Liquid Handlers' text in the description, indicating a significant copy-paste error.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement criteria or social aspects. However, the project's objective to automate and scale a critical data security function within Trusted Research Environments inherently demonstrates an innovation focus.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of the technical problem and proposed solution.
Electronic submission supported with clear instructions and platform link.
Contract duration and start date are well-defined.
Value disclosed and CPV codes properly assigned.
Focus on innovation through automation of data security processes.

Concerns

Complete absence of evaluation criteria, severely impacting clarity and fairness.
Significant data inconsistencies, including currency and irrelevant 'Liquid Handlers' text.
Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
One tender document failed to download, potentially withholding crucial information.
No explicit mention of green procurement or social responsibility aspects.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair competition.
2. Correct all data inconsistencies, especially the estimated value currency and the irrelevant 'Liquid Handlers' text.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and explicitly state mandatory exclusion grounds.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline