Skip to main content
Tenders

C0138 - UK Fund Monitoring Evaluation & Learning

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026611-2026
Value
£4,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 06, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£4,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The UK Portfolio is seeking a single supplier or consortium of suppliers to conduct an impact evaluation of the UK Fund and provide a range of learning services to UK Fund grantholders. The UK Fund is a funding programme that cover two distinct thematic areas: - Connected Communities - CYP and Youth Voice The first awards were granted in February 2024, focusing on Connected Communities, and in 2025 the funding expanded to Children and Young People (CYP) and Youth Voice. The key themes that run across the different thematic areas include voice, relationship building, agency, community systems and lived experience. UK Fund has adopted a funding approach that spans across and between countries, rather than being geographically restricted, and focuses on supporting well-established programmes that demonstrate proven impact, enabling them to scale and expand further. The funding also prioritises equity - targeting only communities facing poverty, disadvantage, and discrimination. Another distinguishing factor about the UK Fund is its emphasis on long-term systems change, requiring projects to include a mix of service delivery and systemic transformation in their plans. The evaluation and learning contract will adopt a collaborative, co-design approach that engages all grantholders, ensuring that all activities align with their learning needs. The supplier is also encouraged to involve the communities with whom the projects work, enabling them to shape and contribute to the learning and evaluation processes. This is particularly important given the programme’s emphasis on voice, agency, and power.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (9)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-24T16:00:00+00:00.
--Submissions must be in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, or Lithuanian.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text.]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must be a single supplier or a consortium of suppliers.
--Must be capable of conducting an impact evaluation of the UK Fund.
--Must be capable of providing a range of learning services to UK Fund grantholders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Proven experience in conducting impact evaluations.
--Demonstrated expertise in providing learning services to funded programmes.
--Ability to adopt a collaborative, co-design approach.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the contract is 4,000,000 EUR.
--The duration of the contract is 48 months.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for UK Fund Monitoring Evaluation & Learning is generally well-structured with a clear description and objective criteria, but lacks specific details on evaluation methodology and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the UK Fund, its thematic areas, and the desired evaluation and learning services is comprehensive. Requirements are documented, and criteria for selection are implied through technical capabilities, though not explicitly itemized.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to any supplier or consortium, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria appear objective, focusing on capability and experience. The use of e-procurement is not explicitly stated but implied by the submission deadline format.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is implied. Document URLs are not provided. Contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not detailed. The lack of direct document access impacts practicality.

No e-submission (explicitly stated)
No document URL
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates appear logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as mandatory requirements. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. While the fund's focus on equity and communities facing disadvantage touches on social aspects, it's not framed as a procurement requirement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria (explicitly stated)

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of the project scope and objectives.
Well-defined CPV code and open procedure.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.
Focus on collaborative and co-design approaches.

Concerns

Lack of accessible tender documents for detailed review.
Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Absence of specific sustainability or innovation requirements.
Potential for a short submission deadline given the scope.

Recommendations

1. Provide direct links or summaries of all tender documents.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria and weighting.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability or innovation objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline