Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of an utility building on plot no. 394/4, cadastral district Krupy

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00150992/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Zachodniopomorskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of an utility building on plot no. 394/4, cadastral district Krupy

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7f84-c58e-5fa8-056e-e50001ac725c.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the construction of an utility building on plot no. 394/4 in Krupy, Poland, with submissions required electronically.

2.SWZ - budowa hali - ostateczny.pdfPDF
2.SWZ - budowa hali - ostateczny.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the construction of an economic building on plot no. 394/4 in the Krupy cadastral district.

4.Załączniki do SWZ w wersji edytowalnej.docDOC
4.Załączniki do SWZ w wersji edytowalnej.doc

This document contains an editable offer form template for the construction of an utility building, including sections for bidder information, price, warranty period, and declarations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of an utility building is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is not fully assessable without more context. No disputes are reported. The presence of a reference number and active status indicates proper registration.

Clarity80/100

The description of the construction work is clear, and the attached documents (SWZ, editable form) provide necessary details for bidders. The scope is defined by the type of building and a specific plot. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their offers will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a description. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the provided AI-extracted sections, suggesting they might be within the attached documents but are not explicitly summarized here.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The contract duration is disclosed. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce transparency and could potentially lead to subjective assessments. The requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are not detailed in the AI extraction, which could be a concern if not adequately addressed in the full documentation.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI extraction indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. Financing information is not disclosed. The contract start date is also missing.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. No disputes or suspensions are reported. Dates are logically presented, with a submission deadline well before the contract duration. The 'active' status is consistent with an open tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and location specified
Detailed description of the work
CPV code provided
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Lack of disclosed estimated value
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
Missing details on eligibility, technical, and financial requirements (in AI extraction)
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria to guide bidders and ensure objective assessment.
3. Ensure all essential requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are explicitly detailed or easily accessible within the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline