Construction d'un bâtiment utilitaire sur la parcelle n° 394/4, district cadastral de Krupy

This tender for the construction of an utility building is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is not fully assessable without more context. No disputes are reported. The presence of a reference number and active status indicates proper registration.

The description of the construction work is clear, and the attached documents (SWZ, editable form) provide necessary details for bidders. The scope is defined by the type of building and a specific plot. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their offers will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a description. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the provided AI-extracted sections, suggesting they might be within the attached documents but are not explicitly summarized here.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The contract duration is disclosed. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce transparency and could potentially lead to subjective assessments. The requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are not detailed in the AI extraction, which could be a concern if not adequately addressed in the full documentation.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI extraction indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. Financing information is not disclosed. The contract start date is also missing.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. No disputes or suspensions are reported. Dates are logically presented, with a submission deadline well before the contract duration. The 'active' status is consistent with an open tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.