Skip to main content
Tenders

Modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points “Grebņeva”, “Terehova”, “Pāternieki”

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
167008
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 01, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 01, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
24 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points “Grebņeva”, “Terehova”, “Pāternieki”
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The deadline for submission is April 27, 2026, 10:00.
--The tender procedure regulations are contained in the 'Nolikums' document.
--The draft contract, based on FIDIC conditions and specific Latvian requirements, is provided in the 'Līguma projekts' document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Selection criteria are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Technical specifications for design, author supervision, and construction work are detailed in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija' document.
--Requirements for creating and submitting sample BIM models in original and IFC formats, including specific geometric and data parameters, are detailed in the 'Nolikuma BIM pielikumi' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--A template for a financial offer is provided in the 'Finanšu piedāvājums (veidne)' document.
--Insurance requirements include professional civil liability, general civil liability, and all-risk construction insurance, with specific coverage limits and conditions, as outlined in the 'Apdrošināšanas prasības' document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167008_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260301163023.pdf -- 112.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points Grebņeva, Terehova, and Pāternieki.

Apdrošināšanas prasībasDOC
Apdrosinasanas_prasibas AK-24_WEB.docx -- 51.6 KB

This document outlines the insurance requirements for bidders, including professional civil liability, general civil liability, and all-risk construction insurance, with specific coverage limits and conditions.

Nolikuma BIM pielikumiZIP
BIM pielikumi_WEB.zip -- 941.8 KB

This document contains requirements for creating and submitting sample BIM models in original and IFC formats, including specific geometric and data parameters, as well as criteria for evaluating these models.

Finanšu piedāvājums (veidne)DOC
Finanšu piedāvājums_AK-24_WEB.docx -- 47.6 KB

This document is a template for a financial offer detailing the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points Grebņeva, Terehova, and Pāternieki, including design, supervision, and construction works.

Līguma projektsZIP
Līguma projekts ar pielikumiem_AK-24.zip -- 698.3 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the modernization of border crossing infrastructure, including design, supervision, and construction, based on FIDIC conditions and specific Latvian requirements.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_AK-24_WEB.docx -- 161.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure concerning the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points "Grebņeva", "Terehova", and "Pāternieki".

Tehniskā specifikācijaZIP
Tehniskā specifikācija_AK-24.zip -- 9.5 MB

This document contains the technical specifications for the modernization of infrastructure at the "Grebņeva", "Terehova", and "Pāternieki" border crossing points, including design, author supervision, and construction work.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for an open tender procedure concerning the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points "Grebņeva", "Terehova", and "Pāternieki", with a submission deadline of April 27, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for border crossing modernization is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and clear information on document access. The process leverages e-procurement effectively.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure rules, has a clear CPV code, and no immediate disputes are indicated. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's complexity. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the standard procedure.

Clarity80/100

Requirements are generally well-documented within provided attachments like technical specifications and contract drafts. The overall description is clear, but specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including contract duration and a reasonable deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and while documents are listed, explicit information about their accessibility without restriction is lacking.

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access (implied)
Fairness85/100

The process utilizes e-procurement, and the disclosure of the contract draft promotes transparency. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria raises concerns about objective assessment. The requirements appear standard for this type of works contract and not tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated, and financing information is implied through EU funding. The contract duration is specified. However, details on contract start date and clear URL access for all documents are not explicitly provided, impacting immediate practicality.

No e-submission (explicit mention)
Document URL not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender status is active, and no suspension or disputes are reported, indicating good internal consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is noted as 'EU Funded,' which can imply adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation as core requirements, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation package
Clear procedure (open tender)
Use of e-procurement
Well-defined technical and contractual frameworks

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders without undue restrictions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline