Skip to main content
Tenders

Conducting a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with municipal activities and city processes

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
165165
Value
€45,455
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 01, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 01, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€45,455
Duration
5 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
73
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€54,868
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
3,568 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Conducting a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with municipal activities and city processes

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submission forms
--Evaluation criteria
--Technical proposal requirements
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Conducting a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with municipal activities and city processes.
--Survey must be part of the city's development strategy monitoring.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
165165_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260301153136.pdf -- 97.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with municipal activities and city processes, detailing submission forms, evaluation criteria, and technical/financial proposal requirements.

Līguma projektsDOC
1. pielikums_liguma_projekts_2026_1.docx -- 63.0 KB

This document contains the draft contract for the open competition "Conducting a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with the municipality's activities and processes in the city" (ID No. RVP PAD 2026/1), outlining the subject of the contract, payment terms, and invoicing procedures.

Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
2. pielikums_tehniska_specifikacija_2026_1.do... -- 144.8 KB

This document contains the technical specification for conducting a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with municipal activities and city processes, as part of the city's development strategy monitoring.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_2026_1.docx -- 73.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for conducting a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with the municipality's activities and city processes.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for a survey on Riga residents' satisfaction with municipal activities and city processes, with a submission deadline of March 30, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a resident satisfaction survey is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and attached documentation. However, clarity on evaluation criteria and accessibility of all documents could be improved for greater transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory requirements, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the project scope. No disputes are recorded. The overall legal framework seems sound.

Clarity70/100

The tender's description and objectives are clear, and essential documents like the technical specification and contract draft are provided. However, specific evaluation criteria are not explicitly detailed, which slightly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. All essential documents (tender notice, requirements, technical specification, contract draft) are attached. The main missing element is detailed evaluation criteria.

Evaluation criteria not fully specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, utilizes e-procurement, and discloses the estimated value. There are no obvious signs of requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which needs to be addressed for full fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which is positive. However, specific details regarding document URLs beyond the main notice and financing information are not readily apparent. The contract start date is linked to mutual signing, which is practical.

No explicit document URLs provided
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, dates, and value are populated consistently. There are no recorded disputes or suspensions, and the timeline dates are logical. This indicates good data integrity.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This area could be enhanced to align with modern public procurement standards.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear objective and scope
Open tender procedure
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of core documents provided

Concerns

Restricted document access reported
Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all registered bidders.
2. Provide detailed and objective evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects (e.g., green, social, innovation) into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline