Skip to main content
Tenders

Service Wing Demolition (RAAC)

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021022-2026
Value
£12,720,000
Location
East Anglia, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£12,720,000
Duration
19 months
Location
East Anglia
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This tender is for the partial demolition of a Service Wing at Hinchingbrooke Hospital that includes Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) panels. The winning bidder will take ownership from RIBA stage 4 through to completion of work. Initial works will include the validation of the RIBA3 designs to an agreed RIBA4 design. The works include the refurbishment of existing facilities to accommodate staff movement. Following the refurbishment the building will require demolition in accordance with the Trust phasing plan provided in the tender pack. A final element of the works will involve the construction of a new road to connect current roads. All of the above works will take place in a live hospital environment. This work sits within the enabling works for the Hinchingbrooke Hospital new build so it is vital that the programme dates are achieved as planned to avoid any delays to construction of the main build. The approximate cost of the work is £10.6m inclusive of Fee's, equipment, trust direct costs, contingency, inflation + VAT. This is part of the NHS England New Hospitals Programme (NHP) so there will be a delay of 5 weeks between notification of outcome to bidders and commencement of contract due to sign off of the business case by NHP. In accordance with PPN 03/24 the Trust is using the Common Assessment Standard as the supplier questionnaire.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
--Bids must adhere to the specified deadline of 2026-04-07T00:00:00.
--Bidders must complete the Common Assessment Standard questionnaire.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per PPN 03/24.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must use the Common Assessment Standard as the supplier questionnaire.
--Bidders must be able to take ownership from RIBA stage 4 through to completion.
--Bidders must be able to work in a live hospital environment.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Experience in partial demolition of structures including Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) panels.
--Ability to validate RIBA3 designs to an agreed RIBA4 design.
--Experience in refurbishment of existing facilities to accommodate staff movement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The approximate cost of the work is £10.6m inclusive of Fees, equipment, trust direct costs, contingency, inflation + VAT.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Service Wing Demolition (RAAC) is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity. Regulatory compliance is implied through the mention of PPN 03/24. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is detailed, outlining the scope from RIBA stage 4 to completion, including demolition, refurbishment, and new road construction within a live hospital environment. Requirements are documented, but evaluation criteria are missing, which affects overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, and evaluation criteria are not specified, leaving gaps in completeness.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender uses the Common Assessment Standard, promoting a degree of standardization. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments. The requirement for specific language submissions might be a barrier for some, but it's not company-specific.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is indirectly mentioned through the NHS England New Hospitals Programme. However, the absence of explicit e-submission details and the lack of document URLs reduce practicality.

No e-submission details
No document URL
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is noted as not being EU funded, which might limit the integration of certain sustainability criteria often promoted by EU funding.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works and technical requirements
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Use of Common Assessment Standard
Open procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Make tender documents accessible with URLs or direct download links.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline