Skip to main content
Tenders

"Airlock" Output Checking System OCS Decision Engine Development Partner

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
013938-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North West England
Type
Open Procedure
66
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

UKB is seeking to further improve its technical controls and intends to implement a functional mechanism to check data egress requests to ensure that participant record-level data is not being removed and does not contain information that can identify individual participants. This Output Checking System (OCS) functionality will allow UKB to enhance the security of the UKB-RAP, reduce the risk of advertent and inadvertent data breaches and importantly increase the trust and transparency of the UKB resource. UKB intends to commence a procurement exercise to procure a replacement for the current UKB-RAP in 2027, which will come into effect in 2028. The OCS will need to be integrated with the new UKB-RAP. Output checking processes for Trusted Research Environments (TREs) have to date been based on manual processes, with data analysts or administrators employed to review data egress requests to ensure they meet compliance standards. Given their reliance on human oversight of large data outputs, these systems are costly and do not provide a failsafe, and they cannot scale to the demands of UKB given its very large user base and continued growth. With over 20,000 publications (5,000 in the past year alone), a manual output checking process is neither desirable nor feasible. To develop and deliver the OCS, UKB is separating the procurement into two elements which will need to be fully interoperable: 1. OCS User Interface (UI) and Workflow (subject to a separate tender exercise via the CCS G-Cloud 14 framework): The development of a seamless UI and Workflow for the OCS, including secure movement of data and integration with existing UKB infrastructure. 2. The OCS Decision Engine (this procurement): The development of the core algorithms to allow an automated assessment of the data being egressed, giving an overall confidence assessment score and a Red/Amber/Green (RAG) rating for decision making The OCS Decision Engine The OCS Decision Engine is made up of two components: 1. Data Trust Engine: reviews the egressed file(s) from UKB-RAP to detect the presence of sensitive information. Through the application of transparent, heuristic rules and configurable thresholds, the Data Trust Engine will create a score for how 'disclosive' the egressed data is that, when coupled with the researcher confidence score below, provides a Red (fail), Amber (unclear) or Green (pass) egress rating. 2. Researcher Behaviour Engine: derives the overall credibility of a given researcher within AMS and UKB-RAP, and assigns a confidence score, which will dictate how human-review decisions are made for 'Amber' outcomes from the Trust Engine. This Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) is being issued to invite Bids for a development partner to design and deliver the OCS Decision Engine, which will include the Data Trust Engine and Researcher Behaviour Engine. The estimated contract value for the provision of services as set out in this Contract Notice and for the duration described is anticipated to be £2m GBP UKB reserves the right to discontinue or delay the procurement process and may decide not to award a contract as a result of this call for competition. UKB shall not be liable for any costs or expenses incurred by any organisation in considering and/or responding to the procurement process. Tenders and supporting documents must be priced in pounds sterling and all payments made under the contract will be in pounds sterling, unless otherwise advised. UKB will incorporate a standstill period at the point the decision in relation to the award of the contracts is notified to bidders. The standstill period, which will be a minimum of eight (8) working days, provides time for unsuccessful bidders to lodge an appeal in regards to the award decisions, before the contracts are entered into. Tenderers are advised to allow adequate time for uploading documents and to dispatch the electronic response well in advance of the closing time to avoid any last minute problems NOTE: To register your interest in this notice and obtain any additional information please visit the myTenders Web Site at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=233323. A user guide is available at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/sitehelp/help_guides.aspx.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (12)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted by 2026-04-02T00:00:00.
--Bidders must register interest and submit bids via the myTenders website (https://www.mytenders.co.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=233323).
--Tenderers must allow adequate time for uploading documents and dispatch electronic response well in advance of the closing time.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidder must be a development partner.
--Bidder must complete the Bidder Questionnaire, including Pre-Qualification and Award Questions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--The OCS Decision Engine must be fully interoperable with the OCS User Interface (UI) and Workflow (procured separately via CCS G-Cloud 14 framework).
--The OCS Decision Engine must be integrable with the new UKB-RAP (coming into effect in 2028).
--Bidder must design and deliver the OCS Decision Engine.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Tenders and supporting documents must be priced in pounds sterling (£GBP).
--All payments under the contract will be in pounds sterling (£GBP).
--The estimated contract value is £2m GBP.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document details an awarded service and maintenance contract for a histopathology processor to Sakura Finetek UK Ltd by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Lot L-2HTM
L-2.html

This document is a Bidder Questionnaire, including Pre-Qualification and Award Questions, required for companies to submit their qualifications and responses for the UK Biobank's OCS Decision Engine tender.

Lot L-3HTM
L-3.html

UK Biobank seeks a development partner for an Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, valued at £2m, to automate the assessment of data egress for sensitive information and researcher credibility, enhancing data security and trust.

Lot L-4HTM
L-4.html

UK Biobank seeks a development partner for an Output Checking System Decision Engine (estimated £2m) to automate data egress checks, enhance security, and ensure participant data privacy by detecting sensitive information and assessing researcher credibility.

Lot L-5HTM
L-5.html

The UK Biobank seeks a development partner for its £2m Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, an automated solution to detect sensitive data and assess researcher credibility during data egress from its research platform.

OCDS RecordDOC
013938-2026_ocds_record.json

UK Biobank is seeking a development partner to design and deliver an automated Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, valued at £2m, to enhance data security and prevent the unauthorized removal of sensitive participant data from its research platform.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013938-2026_ocds_release.json

UK Biobank is seeking a development partner to design and deliver an automated Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, comprising a Data Trust Engine and a Researcher Behaviour Engine, to enhance data security and prevent sensitive participant data egress from its research platform.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013938-2026_official.pdf

UK Biobank seeks a development partner for its £2m Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, which will automate data egress checks using Data Trust and Researcher Behaviour Engines to prevent sensitive participant data breaches.

Tender NoticeHTM
013938-2026.html

Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a moderately complete and clear procurement for an innovative data security system, but is significantly hampered by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a notable currency inconsistency in the estimated value.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to UK procurement practices, including the use of an Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) and a specified standstill period. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. The main legal compliance concern is the missing reveal date, which is a minor administrative oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity60/100

The project description and technical requirements for the OCS Decision Engine, including its components (Data Trust Engine, Researcher Behaviour Engine), are clearly articulated and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location (NUTS code) is provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specified evaluation criteria and a failed download for one of the listed documents. A significant inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (EUR vs. GBP) also detracts from completeness.

No evaluation criteria specified
One document download failed
Fairness55/100

The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness, as it can lead to a perception of arbitrary decision-making and makes it challenging for bidders to submit competitive proposals. While electronic submission is supported and requirements do not appear tailored, this omission is critical.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission via a specified online portal, provides a clear contract start date and duration, and includes financing information. The availability of a document URL enhances practicality. The failed download of one document is a minor practical inconvenience.

One document download failed
Data Consistency60/100

A significant inconsistency exists in the estimated contract value, which is stated as 2.4 million EUR in the financial information section but £2 million GBP in the description and requirements. While these values are numerically close, the currency discrepancy is problematic. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type.

Inconsistent estimated value currency (EUR vs. GBP)
Missing procedure type codes
Sustainability60/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or EU funding criteria. However, the project itself, focusing on automating data egress checks to enhance security and scalability, represents an innovative approach to managing critical research data, which can be considered a form of operational sustainability and efficiency.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description and technical requirements
Electronic submission supported via a dedicated portal
Innovative project addressing critical data security and scalability needs
Transparent disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
Adherence to UK procurement practices (ITN, standstill period)

Concerns

Complete absence of specified evaluation criteria
Inconsistency in the estimated contract value currency (EUR vs. GBP)
One tender document failed to download
Lack of explicit green or social procurement considerations
Missing reveal date for the tender

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Clarify and correct the estimated contract value, specifying the definitive currency.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and downloadable without issues.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline