Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login22 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document details an awarded service and maintenance contract for a histopathology processor to Sakura Finetek UK Ltd by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
This document is a Bidder Questionnaire, including Pre-Qualification and Award Questions, required for companies to submit their qualifications and responses for the UK Biobank's OCS Decision Engine tender.
UK Biobank seeks a development partner for an Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, valued at £2m, to automate the assessment of data egress for sensitive information and researcher credibility, enhancing data security and trust.
UK Biobank seeks a development partner for an Output Checking System Decision Engine (estimated £2m) to automate data egress checks, enhance security, and ensure participant data privacy by detecting sensitive information and assessing researcher credibility.
The UK Biobank seeks a development partner for its £2m Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, an automated solution to detect sensitive data and assess researcher credibility during data egress from its research platform.
UK Biobank is seeking a development partner to design and deliver an automated Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, valued at £2m, to enhance data security and prevent the unauthorized removal of sensitive participant data from its research platform.
UK Biobank is seeking a development partner to design and deliver an automated Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, comprising a Data Trust Engine and a Researcher Behaviour Engine, to enhance data security and prevent sensitive participant data egress from its research platform.
UK Biobank seeks a development partner for its £2m Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine, which will automate data egress checks using Data Trust and Researcher Behaviour Engines to prevent sensitive participant data breaches.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender presents a moderately complete and clear procurement for an innovative data security system, but is significantly hampered by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a notable currency inconsistency in the estimated value.
The tender generally adheres to UK procurement practices, including the use of an Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) and a specified standstill period. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. The main legal compliance concern is the missing reveal date, which is a minor administrative oversight.
The project description and technical requirements for the OCS Decision Engine, including its components (Data Trust Engine, Researcher Behaviour Engine), are clearly articulated and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location (NUTS code) is provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specified evaluation criteria and a failed download for one of the listed documents. A significant inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (EUR vs. GBP) also detracts from completeness.
The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness, as it can lead to a perception of arbitrary decision-making and makes it challenging for bidders to submit competitive proposals. While electronic submission is supported and requirements do not appear tailored, this omission is critical.
The tender supports electronic submission via a specified online portal, provides a clear contract start date and duration, and includes financing information. The availability of a document URL enhances practicality. The failed download of one document is a minor practical inconvenience.
A significant inconsistency exists in the estimated contract value, which is stated as 2.4 million EUR in the financial information section but £2 million GBP in the description and requirements. While these values are numerically close, the currency discrepancy is problematic. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type.
The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or EU funding criteria. However, the project itself, focusing on automating data egress checks to enhance security and scalability, represents an innovative approach to managing critical research data, which can be considered a form of operational sustainability and efficiency.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required