Construction of Liepāja Port piers No. 92A and 92B

This tender for the construction of port berths in Liepaja is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and the process is generally compliant with regulatory frameworks. No disputes are reported.

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached files. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated in the main notice, which could be improved.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of works, and deadlines. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, impacting overall completeness.

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. However, the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, which is a significant concern for full document access and transparency. The absence of disclosed value also impacts fairness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement', but there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.