Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Laundry and dry cleaning services for Liepāja preschool educational institutions

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 29, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167671
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 29, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 22, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 29, 2026

Tender Opening

April 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
24 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€53,986
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
549 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Laundry and dry cleaning services for Liepāja preschool educational institutions

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for laundry and dry cleaning services for Liepāja preschools presents a solid opportunity for experienced providers. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating operational excellence, reliability, and cost-effectiveness, while leveraging any implicit quality expectations of serving young children. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and showcasing superior service delivery will be paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Hygienic Laundry Services for Children's Well-being

Cost-Effective and Efficient Operations for Public Institutions

Commitment to Quality and Service Excellence

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria implies a focus on meeting all mandatory requirements and demonstrating best value.
Serving preschools suggests an implicit need for high hygiene standards and gentle treatment of fabrics.
The 24-month duration offers a stable revenue stream for a committed provider.
Key Challenges
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy for scoring.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas and clearly articulating the benefits of the proposed service, assuming price and technical capability will be key implicit factors.

Estimated value not disclosed could indicate a tight budget or a desire for competitive pricing.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure competitive pricing while maintaining profitability. Consider offering tiered service options if feasible.

No explicit mention of Green Procurement or Social Aspects may mean these are not primary drivers, but demonstrating them can still be a differentiator.

While not mandatory, subtly highlight any sustainable practices or community engagement to add value and potentially appeal to the contracting authority's broader objectives.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established laundry and dry cleaning service provider with a proven track record in commercial or institutional contracts, ideally with experience serving public sector clients or organizations with stringent hygiene and safety standards. The ideal bidder will possess robust operational capacity, efficient logistics, a commitment to quality control, and a competitive pricing structure.
Key Requirements
Mandatory exclusion grounds compliance
Eligibility requirements fulfillment
Technical capability requirements adherence (as detailed in Document 2)
Financial requirements compliance (as detailed in Document 3)
Submission requirements adherence (as detailed in Document 3 and Main tender page)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with child-focused institutions and understanding of specific hygiene needs.
Highly efficient and cost-effective operational model that translates to competitive pricing.
Robust quality assurance processes with clear evidence of compliance.
Flexible and responsive service delivery tailored to the needs of multiple preschools.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local residents for service delivery, potentially offering training opportunities for disadvantaged individuals within the Liepāja community, even if not explicitly requested.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (as per Document 2)

Thoroughly address all technical requirements, detailing equipment, processes, quality control, and staff expertise. Emphasize hygiene, safety, and efficiency in laundry and dry cleaning processes. Provide concrete examples of how these capabilities will be applied to preschool needs.

Financial Offer

Develop a highly competitive pricing structure. Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis to ensure profitability while offering value. Consider offering volume discounts or service level agreements that demonstrate cost-efficiency.

Compliance (Exclusion, Eligibility, Submission)

Ensure absolute adherence to all mandatory requirements. Double-check all documentation for completeness and accuracy. Any non-compliance here is an automatic disqualification.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze All Mandatory Requirements
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija' for all exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria, technical capabilities, financial requirements, and submission details. Ensure every point is addressed comprehensively and accurately.

Ensures bid is not disqualified on technicalities.
Infer Evaluation Criteria and Focus on Best Value
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume price and technical capability will be key. Structure the bid to demonstrate superior technical competence and a highly competitive price, emphasizing the overall value proposition for the contracting authority.

Maximizes chances of winning by addressing likely, albeit unstated, evaluation priorities.
Highlight Hygiene and Safety Expertise for Children
HighMed effort

Emphasize specialized knowledge and processes for handling laundry and dry cleaning for young children, focusing on hypoallergenic detergents, stringent disinfection protocols, and fabric care to maintain garment integrity and safety.

Sets the bid apart by addressing the specific needs of the client's end-users.
Develop a Robust Quality Assurance Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a detailed quality assurance plan that includes regular checks, staff training, and a system for addressing any client feedback or issues promptly. This demonstrates a commitment to consistent service delivery.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver reliable, high-quality services.
Proactive Pricing Strategy
MediumHigh effort

Given the undisclosed estimated value, conduct thorough market research and cost analysis to formulate a competitive yet profitable pricing strategy. Consider offering clear pricing tiers or options if appropriate.

Avoids overpricing or underbidding, ensuring competitiveness and financial viability.
Incorporate Local Employment and Sustainability
LowLow effort

While not mandatory, subtly mention any initiatives related to local employment or environmentally friendly practices (e.g., water/energy efficiency, responsible chemical use) to add value and align with potential broader municipal goals.

Adds a layer of positive contribution beyond core service delivery.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and hygienic partner for Liepāja's preschools, emphasizing a deep understanding of the unique requirements of serving young children. Highlight operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness as key benefits for the municipality, ensuring a strong value proposition.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--[Details to be extracted from Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija]
--[Details to be extracted from Document: Main tender page]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Details to be extracted from Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167671_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329164407.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the first part of a tender for laundry and dry cleaning services for pre-school educational institutions in Liepāja, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial offer requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167671_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260329164407.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for laundry and dry cleaning services for preschool educational institutions in Liepāja, specifically for part 2 of the procurement.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for laundry and dry cleaning services for Liepāja preschool educational institutions, with a submission deadline of April 29, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for laundry and dry cleaning services for Liepāja preschools is generally well-structured, but lacks transparency in financial details and evaluation criteria, and has restricted document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open competition type and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission date. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear. Requirements are documented across multiple technical specification documents, which is standard. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and tender validity. Three key documents are listed. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates potential issues with full document availability to all interested parties, which is a significant concern for fairness. Objective criteria are not fully specified due to missing evaluation criteria.

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but can be inferred from the duration and submission deadline. Financing information is not provided. The duration of 24 months is specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear service description and title
Open competition procedure
E-procurement utilized
CPV code provided
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline