Skip to main content
Tenders

Regenerative Schools Pilot - Academic Advisor

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022799-2026
Value
£1,500,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,500,000
Duration
44 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Department for Education (DfE) is the UK government’s Department responsible for the schools in England. As part of this role, we oversee the safety, condition, and long‑term sustainability of the education estate. This includes ensuring that current and future school buildings are provided with safe, high‑quality environments where children can learn and thrive. On 11th February 2026 the Department published its 10-year plan for the Education Estate, the Education Estates Strategy, A decade of national renewal. The Regenerative Schools Pilot was outlined within the strategy: “Testing new solutions, technologies and construction methods – we will continue to look at how we can go further for our future design specifications as part of a research and development programme supported by £33 million to 2029-30. This will prioritise regenerative approaches looking at a wide range of outcomes from energy storage to bio-based construction materials, such as timber and working closely with Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on the Timber in Construction Road Map.” This is your opportunity to shape this cutting‑edge project, which will guide the Department’s work over the next ten years and beyond. The Regenerative Schools Pilot, Introduction: The Department for Education intends to research, develop, and deliver a series of single and dual classroom, ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings under the Regenerative Schools Programme. This will be accompanied by a package of landscaping and retrofit interventions which will support biodiversity, passive heat‑reduction (such as tree shading), fabric upgrades to existing buildings (cladding and windows), sustainable drainage systems and the creation of outdoor learning spaces. This programme will also produce case studies, guidance and resources for schools. As part of the Regenerative Schools Programme, the Department intends to appoint two parties in August 2026: an Innovation Lead and an Academic Adviser. These organisations will produce feasibility studies, research the building materials and techniques required to produce ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings and develop 6 standard designs. Then, in March 2027, the Department plans to appoint a contractor to deliver the works, using the materials and methods specified by the Innovation Lead and Academic Advisers. Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor’s appointment.   The Academic Adviser The Academic Adviser will complement the Innovation Lead’s technical work by focusing on the social, educational, and behavioural dimensions of the programme. You will use your research capabilities and academic expertise related to ultra-low-carbon materials to advise the Department and Innovation Lead. Your role will begin with the creation of a school‑ready engagement toolkit and the delivery of inclusive engagement across the participating regions. This will involve working directly with pupils, staff, governors, parents, and other stakeholders to build a picture of community needs, aspirations, and challenges, ensuring these insights inform both retrofit strategies and the design of the new learning spaces. You will translate these findings into clear design inputs so that lived experience directly shapes feasibility work and guidance documents. As projects move into delivery and buildings begin to be used, the Academic Adviser will lead a structured programme of post‑occupancy evaluation, bringing together qualitative and quantitative evidence to understand how the new and refurbished environments perform in practice. Your work will consider internal and external environmental factors (such as air quality, temperature, and acoustics), wellbeing, nature‑connectedness, and educational impact, helping the Department understand what works and where further development may be required. The insights you produce will be shared through publications, reports, and case studies, contributing to future policy and guidance for the wider education estate. Working with the Innovation Lead The Innovation Lead and Academic Adviser are intended to operate in parallel, each with a distinct focus but with close coordination throughout. The Innovation Lead will ensure technical feasibility, safety, and low‑carbon performance, while the Academic Adviser will ensure that the programme responds to the needs and experiences of the schools and communities involved. Together you will provide the Department with the combined academic, social, and technical expertise required to develop a set of replicable, ultra‑low‑carbon solutions that are grounded in real‑world school environments and capable of informing future national delivery. Please refer to the engagement section of this notice for market engagement details.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (12)
Technical (8)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-01T00:00:00.
--Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor's appointment, implying this tender is for the Academic Adviser role.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--Must be able to research, develop, and deliver ultra-low-carbon school buildings and associated interventions.
--Must possess research capabilities and academic expertise related to ultra-low-carbon materials.
--Must be able to advise the Department and Innovation Lead on social, educational, and behavioural dimensions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Proven ability to research and develop ultra-low-carbon school building designs.
--Expertise in sustainable drainage systems and outdoor learning space creation.
--Experience in developing case studies, guidance, and resources for schools.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total value of the contract is 1,500,000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an Academic Advisor for the Regenerative Schools Pilot is well-structured with a clear description of the role and project objectives. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits good legal compliance with a clear CPV code and a specified organization. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the planning status. The absence of explicit dispute information and the 'planning' status suggest a proactive approach, but the lack of a reveal date is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the Academic Advisor's role and responsibilities is comprehensive, detailing the social, educational, and behavioral dimensions. The project's context and objectives are clearly articulated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The description is detailed. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of a clear procedure code detract from its completeness.

No document content available
Procedure code missing
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with the estimated value disclosed and a reasonable contract duration. The requirements are generally objective and focused on expertise. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The mention of separate market engagement suggests a transparent process.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission methods and the absence of explicit financing details reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated consistently. The timeline dates are logical, and the status is 'planning'. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data integrity.

Sustainability50/100

The tender has a strong focus on sustainability, particularly 'ultra-low-carbon' and 'regenerative' approaches, aligning with green procurement principles. However, explicit mention of social aspects or innovation as distinct criteria beyond the project's core theme, and confirmation of EU funding, are not detailed.

Social aspects not explicitly detailed
Innovation not explicitly detailed as a separate criterion

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description
Well-defined role of the Academic Advisor
Strong emphasis on sustainability and regenerative approaches
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of information on e-submission process
No content available for tender documents
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
2. Provide details on the e-submission process and platform.
3. Make tender documents accessible with full content.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline