Skip to main content
Tenders

Provision of Client Support Consultancy Services Framework

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018395-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
96 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Client Support Consultancy Services Framework for WSCC

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for client support consultancy services offers a clear framework with a significant estimated value. However, it lacks detail on evaluation criteria and direct e-submission, impacting practical execution.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general open procedure requirements. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date for submissions
Clarity80/100

The title, description, and basic information are clear. Key requirements like eligibility and technical capability are listed, but the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes understanding the selection process less transparent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the estimated value, contract duration, and submission deadline is present. The reference number and organization are clearly stated. However, the lack of document content summaries or direct access to full documentation limits the completeness of the information provided upfront.

No document content available for 0 out of 5 documents
Fairness85/100

The open procedure and disclosed value suggest a fair process. The requirements are generally objective, and the structure does not immediately indicate tailoring to specific companies. The long contract duration (96 months) might be perceived as a barrier to newer entrants.

Long contract duration could be a barrier
Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the explicit mention of 'No e-submission' significantly hinders practical accessibility and efficiency for potential bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission indicated
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a tender issuance. The contract start date is after the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which are common areas for sustainability considerations in modern tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Appropriate CPV code provided
Open procedure, promoting competition

Concerns

Lack of specified evaluation criteria
Absence of e-submission, impacting accessibility
No detailed information on sustainability aspects
Limited content summary for attached documents

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly to enhance transparency.
2. Implement an e-submission system for improved bidder convenience and efficiency.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation requirements where relevant.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline