Skip to main content
Tenders

Regenerative Schools Pilot - Academic Advisor

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022612-2026
Value
£1,500,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,500,000
Duration
44 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Department for Education and the Education Estates Strategy. The Department for Education (DfE) is the UK government’s Department responsible for the schools in England. As part of this role, we oversee the safety, condition, and long‑term sustainability of the education estate. This includes ensuring that current and future school buildings are provided with safe, high‑quality environments where children can learn and thrive. On 11th February 2026 the Department published its 10-year plan for the Education Estate, the Education Estates Strategy, A decade of national renewal. The Regenerative Schools Pilot was outlined within the strategy: “Testing new solutions, technologies and construction methods – we will continue to look at how we can go further for our future design specifications as part of a research and development programme supported by £33 million to 2029-30. This will prioritise regenerative approaches looking at a wide range of outcomes from energy storage to bio-based construction materials, such as timber and working closely with Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on the Timber in Construction Road Map.” This is your opportunity to shape this cutting‑edge project, which will guide the Department’s work over the next ten years and beyond. The Regenerative Schools Pilot, Introduction: The Department for Education intends to research, develop, and deliver a series of single and dual classroom, ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings under the Regenerative Schools Programme. This will be accompanied by a package of landscaping and retrofit interventions which will support biodiversity, passive heat‑reduction (such as tree shading), fabric upgrades to existing buildings (cladding and windows), sustainable drainage systems and the creation of outdoor learning spaces. This programme will also produce case studies, guidance and resources for schools. As part of the Regenerative Schools Programme, the Department intends to appoint two parties in August 2026: an Innovation Lead and an Academic Adviser. These organisations will produce feasibility studies, research the building materials and techniques required to produce ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings and develop 6 standard designs. Then, in March 2027, the Department plans to appoint a contractor to deliver the works, using the materials and methods specified by the Innovation Lead and Academic Advisers. Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor’s appointment. The Academic Adviser: The Academic Adviser will complement the Innovation Lead’s technical work by focusing on the social, educational, and behavioural dimensions of the programme. You will use your research capabilities and academic expertise related to ultra-low-carbon materials to advise the Department and Innovation Lead. Your role will begin with the creation of a school‑ready engagement toolkit and the delivery of inclusive engagement across the participating regions. This will involve working directly with pupils, staff, governors, parents, and other stakeholders to build a picture of community needs, aspirations, and challenges, ensuring these insights inform both retrofit strategies and the design of the new learning spaces. You will translate these findings into clear design inputs so that lived experience directly shapes feasibility work and guidance documents. As projects move into delivery and buildings begin to be used, the Academic Adviser will lead a structured programme of post‑occupancy evaluation, bringing together qualitative and quantitative evidence to understand how the new and refurbished environments perform in practice. Your work will consider internal and external environmental factors (such as air quality, temperature, and acoustics), wellbeing, nature‑connectedness, and educational impact, helping the Department understand what works and where further development may be required. The insights you produce will be shared through publications, reports, and case studies, contributing to future policy and guidance for the wider education estate. Working with the Innovation Lead: The Innovation Lead and Academic Adviser are intended to operate in parallel, each with a distinct focus but with close coordination throughout. The Innovation Lead will ensure technical feasibility, safety, and low‑carbon performance, while the Academic Adviser will ensure that the programme responds to the needs and experiences of the schools and communities involved. Together you will provide the Department with the combined academic, social, and technical expertise required to develop a set of replicable, ultra‑low‑carbon solutions that are grounded in real‑world school environments and capable of informing future national delivery. Please refer to the engagement section of this notice for market engagement details.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

28 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (15)
Technical (9)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Tender must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-01T00:00:00.
--Bids must be provided in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS15
--Must be able to research, develop, and deliver ultra-low-carbon school buildings.
--Must be able to produce feasibility studies.
--Must be able to research building materials and techniques for ultra-low-carbon school buildings.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Proven ability to research and develop ultra-low-carbon school building solutions.
--Experience in developing feasibility studies for construction projects.
--Expertise in identifying and evaluating sustainable and low-carbon building materials and construction techniques.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The value of the contract is 1,500,000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a pilot project for regenerative schools, focusing on academic advisory services. While generally clear and well-structured, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission methods beyond the deadline.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to legal compliance standards with a clear description of the project and a specified CPV code. However, the absence of an 'evaluation criteria' section and a clear 'reveal date' for detailed documents represent minor omissions that could affect procedural transparency.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the Regenerative Schools Pilot and the role of the Academic Adviser is detailed and comprehensive. The project's goals, the expected deliverables, and the collaboration with the Innovation Lead are clearly articulated, providing a good understanding of the scope.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information such as the title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, the lack of attached documents with content, beyond stating their existence, and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria reduce the completeness score.

Documents with content/summaries: 0
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender exhibits good fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using a standard CPV code, suggesting an objective approach. The description of the role is detailed, allowing potential bidders to understand the requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria means bidders cannot fully assess how their submissions will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, which aids in practical planning. However, it critically lacks information regarding the method of submission (e-submission is not explicitly stated as the method) and financing details, impacting the overall practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are consistently populated. The dates provided appear logical within the planning phase. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender has a strong focus on 'regenerative approaches', 'ultra-low-carbon', and 'biodiversity', aligning with green procurement principles. However, the specific inclusion of measurable sustainability targets, green procurement certifications, or social value criteria is not explicitly detailed within the provided text.

Not green procurement (specific metrics)
No social criteria (explicitly stated)

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description
Well-defined role for Academic Adviser
Explicit mention of regenerative and ultra-low-carbon principles
Estimated value and contract duration provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detail on submission method (e-submission)
No attached documents with content for review
Missing reveal date for further documentation

Recommendations

1. Include specific evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and provide a direct link for document access.
3. Publish documents containing detailed requirements and scope of work.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline