Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Landscaping of Rubeni Park in Jēkabpils municipality

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
167076
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 29, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 28, 2026

Tender Opening

April 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Zemgale
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Landscaping of Rubeni Park in Jēkabpils municipality
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Rubeņu Park landscaping is a price-driven opportunity. Success hinges on meticulous cost control, efficient execution, and demonstrating value beyond the lowest bid, even without explicit social or innovative criteria. Focus on a lean, high-quality delivery model.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering high-quality park landscaping at the most competitive price.

Reliable Local Partner: Proven ability to execute municipal projects efficiently within Jēkabpils novads.

Quality Craftsmanship: Ensuring durable and aesthetically pleasing park furniture and landscaping.

Key Opportunities
Price-driven evaluation allows for aggressive bidding if cost efficiencies are identified.
Detailed specifications for park furniture and work volumes provide a clear basis for accurate costing and planning.
Lack of explicit social value or innovation requirements simplifies bid focus on core delivery.
Key Challenges
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond lowest price creates uncertainty and potential for subjective interpretation if not managed carefully.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas, particularly quality of materials and workmanship, to build confidence. Ensure all documentation is flawless and directly addresses the specifications.

Lack of disclosed estimated value makes precise pricing strategy more challenging.

Conduct thorough market research and benchmark against similar projects to establish a realistic cost baseline. Prepare multiple pricing scenarios.

Missing information on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements necessitates proactive clarification.

Submit formal requests for clarification to the contracting authority regarding all missing mandatory and desirable requirements well in advance of the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized construction or landscaping company with proven experience in municipal park projects, strong local supply chain relationships in Jēkabpils novads, and a highly efficient operational model capable of delivering high-quality work at a competitive price.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Park Specification (DOCUMENT 2)
Accurate and comprehensive Work Volumes (DOCUMENT 4)
Adherence to Tender Regulations (DOCUMENT 3)
Meeting Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (implied)
Meeting Eligibility Requirements (implied)
Meeting Technical Capability Requirements (implied)
Meeting Financial Requirements (implied)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated local sourcing and employment within Jēkabpils novads, even if not explicitly required.
Detailed, proactive risk assessment and mitigation plan for the project execution.
Presentation of a highly efficient, lean project management methodology.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to sourcing a percentage of materials from local Jēkabpils novads suppliers to support the local economy.
Offer to provide a short training session or site visit for local students interested in landscaping/construction.
Bid Focus Areas
Price100% (implied)

Develop a highly accurate cost model based on detailed analysis of 'Darbu apjomi' (DOCUMENT 4) and 'Parka specifikācija' (DOCUMENT 2). Identify opportunities for cost savings through efficient logistics, material sourcing, and optimized labor deployment. Ensure a competitive but sustainable margin.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze Park Specifications and Work Volumes
CriticalHigh effort

Meticulously review 'Parka specifikācija' (DOCUMENT 2) and 'Darbu apjomi' (DOCUMENT 4) to ensure complete understanding of material requirements, dimensions, design, and quantities. Any deviation or misinterpretation will lead to non-compliance or cost overruns.

Ensures bid accuracy, compliance, and competitive pricing.
Develop a Lean and Competitive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 'lowest price' evaluation, focus on optimizing all cost elements. Leverage local supplier relationships for materials and equipment. Implement efficient work methodologies to minimize labor and time. Conduct thorough risk assessment to avoid unforeseen costs.

Maximizes chances of winning on price while maintaining profitability.
Proactively Seek Clarification on Missing Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Submit formal requests for clarification to Jēkabpils novada pašvaldība regarding all missing information on exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements. This is crucial for bid completeness and avoiding disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures a compliant bid.
Highlight Local Presence and Experience
HighMed effort

Even without explicit requirements, emphasize any local experience in Jēkabpils novads or proximity to the park. Showcase understanding of local conditions and community needs. This can build trust and rapport with the contracting authority.

Builds confidence and potentially influences subjective aspects of the evaluation.
Prepare a Detailed Project Execution Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a clear, step-by-step plan for project execution, including timelines, resource allocation, quality control measures, and site management. This demonstrates competence and foresight, even if not explicitly evaluated.

Enhances bid credibility and demonstrates project management capability.
Incorporate Local Sourcing Commitment
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to sourcing a defined percentage of materials (e.g., timber, plants) from local businesses within Jēkabpils novads. This aligns with broader public sector goals and can be a subtle differentiator.

Adds value beyond price and demonstrates community support.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-efficient provider without compromising on the quality specified in 'Parka specifikācija'. Highlight operational efficiencies and lean project management. Emphasize reliability and a proven track record in similar municipal works, even if not explicitly stated as a requirement.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167076_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329161207.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the improvement of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Darbu apjomiXLS
Darbu apjomi (1).xls -- 246.0 KB

This document contains a list of work volumes for the Rubeņi park landscaping project, detailing various tasks, units, quantities, and costs.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_JNP_2026_32_Rubeņi.docx -- 448.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the landscaping of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, with the contract awarded based on the lowest price.

Parka specifikācijaXLS
Rubeņu parka labiekārtojuma specifikācija kop... -- 1.8 MB

This document contains a specification for park furniture elements, including benches, tables with benches, and insect hotels, detailing their materials, dimensions, and design requirements.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the landscaping of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, Latvia, with a submission deadline of April 28, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Rubeņu Park landscaping is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure rules, with a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the park landscaping is clear, and the attached documents (work volumes, park specification) provide detailed technical requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes the award basis less transparent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines and location. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted section, suggesting these might be in the documents but not explicitly summarized.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement suggests a fair process. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of a direct URL for document submission and the absence of information regarding contract start date and financing details reduce its practicality.

No e-submission (implied, as no URL provided)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined CPV code and location
Open procedure with e-procurement
Detailed technical specifications available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Restricted document access flagged
Lack of detail on financial and eligibility requirements

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all interested parties.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline