Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Landskabspleje af Rubeni Park i Jēkabpils kommune

Åben
Frist
23 dage tilbage
April 28, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Byggeri
Reference
167076
Værdi
Ikke oplyst
Lokation
Zemgale, Letland
Udgivet
Marts 29, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 29, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 21, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 28, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 28, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
Ikke oplyst
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Zemgale
Type
Byggeri
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€491,981
Gns. Tilbud
3.0
Konkurrence
Lav
SMV Vindere
99%
20,606 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Landskabspleje af Rubeni Park i Jēkabpils kommune
EU-finansieret

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

60%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender for Rubeņu Park landscaping is a price-driven opportunity. Success hinges on meticulous cost control, efficient execution, and demonstrating value beyond the lowest bid, even without explicit social or innovative criteria. Focus on a lean, high-quality delivery model.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering high-quality park landscaping at the most competitive price.

Reliable Local Partner: Proven ability to execute municipal projects efficiently within Jēkabpils novads.

Quality Craftsmanship: Ensuring durable and aesthetically pleasing park furniture and landscaping.

Nøglemuligheder
Price-driven evaluation allows for aggressive bidding if cost efficiencies are identified.
Detailed specifications for park furniture and work volumes provide a clear basis for accurate costing and planning.
Lack of explicit social value or innovation requirements simplifies bid focus on core delivery.
Nøgleudfordringer
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond lowest price creates uncertainty and potential for subjective interpretation if not managed carefully.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas, particularly quality of materials and workmanship, to build confidence. Ensure all documentation is flawless and directly addresses the specifications.

Lack of disclosed estimated value makes precise pricing strategy more challenging.

Conduct thorough market research and benchmark against similar projects to establish a realistic cost baseline. Prepare multiple pricing scenarios.

Missing information on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements necessitates proactive clarification.

Submit formal requests for clarification to the contracting authority regarding all missing mandatory and desirable requirements well in advance of the deadline.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A small to medium-sized construction or landscaping company with proven experience in municipal park projects, strong local supply chain relationships in Jēkabpils novads, and a highly efficient operational model capable of delivering high-quality work at a competitive price.
Nøglekrav
Compliance with Park Specification (DOCUMENT 2)
Accurate and comprehensive Work Volumes (DOCUMENT 4)
Adherence to Tender Regulations (DOCUMENT 3)
Meeting Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (implied)
Meeting Eligibility Requirements (implied)
Meeting Technical Capability Requirements (implied)
Meeting Financial Requirements (implied)
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrated local sourcing and employment within Jēkabpils novads, even if not explicitly required.
Detailed, proactive risk assessment and mitigation plan for the project execution.
Presentation of a highly efficient, lean project management methodology.
Muligheder for social værdi
Commit to sourcing a percentage of materials from local Jēkabpils novads suppliers to support the local economy.
Offer to provide a short training session or site visit for local students interested in landscaping/construction.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Price100% (implied)

Develop a highly accurate cost model based on detailed analysis of 'Darbu apjomi' (DOCUMENT 4) and 'Parka specifikācija' (DOCUMENT 2). Identify opportunities for cost savings through efficient logistics, material sourcing, and optimized labor deployment. Ensure a competitive but sustainable margin.

Anbefalinger6
Thoroughly Analyze Park Specifications and Work Volumes
KritiskHøj indsats

Meticulously review 'Parka specifikācija' (DOCUMENT 2) and 'Darbu apjomi' (DOCUMENT 4) to ensure complete understanding of material requirements, dimensions, design, and quantities. Any deviation or misinterpretation will lead to non-compliance or cost overruns.

Ensures bid accuracy, compliance, and competitive pricing.
Develop a Lean and Competitive Pricing Strategy
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the 'lowest price' evaluation, focus on optimizing all cost elements. Leverage local supplier relationships for materials and equipment. Implement efficient work methodologies to minimize labor and time. Conduct thorough risk assessment to avoid unforeseen costs.

Maximizes chances of winning on price while maintaining profitability.
Proactively Seek Clarification on Missing Requirements
KritiskMedium indsats

Submit formal requests for clarification to Jēkabpils novada pašvaldība regarding all missing information on exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements. This is crucial for bid completeness and avoiding disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures a compliant bid.
Highlight Local Presence and Experience
HøjMedium indsats

Even without explicit requirements, emphasize any local experience in Jēkabpils novads or proximity to the park. Showcase understanding of local conditions and community needs. This can build trust and rapport with the contracting authority.

Builds confidence and potentially influences subjective aspects of the evaluation.
Prepare a Detailed Project Execution Plan
HøjMedium indsats

Outline a clear, step-by-step plan for project execution, including timelines, resource allocation, quality control measures, and site management. This demonstrates competence and foresight, even if not explicitly evaluated.

Enhances bid credibility and demonstrates project management capability.
Incorporate Local Sourcing Commitment
MediumLav indsats

Include a commitment to sourcing a defined percentage of materials (e.g., timber, plants) from local businesses within Jēkabpils novads. This aligns with broader public sector goals and can be a subtle differentiator.

Adds value beyond price and demonstrates community support.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position as the most cost-efficient provider without compromising on the quality specified in 'Parka specifikācija'. Highlight operational efficiencies and lean project management. Emphasize reliability and a proven track record in similar municipal works, even if not explicitly stated as a requirement.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not provided in the tender documents]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

5 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167076_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329161207.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the improvement of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Vis
Darbu apjomiXLS
Darbu apjomi (1).xls -- 246.0 KB

This document contains a list of work volumes for the Rubeņi park landscaping project, detailing various tasks, units, quantities, and costs.

Vis
NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_JNP_2026_32_Rubeņi.docx -- 448.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the landscaping of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, with the contract awarded based on the lowest price.

Vis
Parka specifikācijaXLS
Rubeņu parka labiekārtojuma specifikācija kop... -- 1.8 MB

This document contains a specification for park furniture elements, including benches, tables with benches, and insect hotels, detailing their materials, dimensions, and design requirements.

Vis
Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the landscaping of Rubeņu Park in Jēkabpils municipality, Latvia, with a submission deadline of April 28, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Rubeņu Park landscaping is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting overall completeness and fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure rules, with a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the park landscaping is clear, and the attached documents (work volumes, park specification) provide detailed technical requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes the award basis less transparent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines and location. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted section, suggesting these might be in the documents but not explicitly summarized.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement suggests a fair process. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of a direct URL for document submission and the absence of information regarding contract start date and financing details reduce its practicality.

No e-submission (implied, as no URL provided)
Missing contract start date
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined CPV code and location
Open procedure with e-procurement
Detailed technical specifications available

Bekymringer

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Restricted document access flagged
Lack of detail on financial and eligibility requirements

Anbefalinger

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all interested parties.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline