Skip to main content
Tenders

Framework for Legionella Risk Assessments

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018409-2026
Value
£255,600
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£255,600
Duration
24 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Durham County Council requires a competent and accredited Contractor to deliver a comprehensive programme of Legionella Risk Assessments across approximately 525 premises, including offices, public buildings, educational establishments, leisure facilities, communal areas, fire stations, and sports pavilions.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear framework for Legionella Risk Assessments with sufficient basic information, but lacks detail in crucial areas like evaluation criteria and document content, impacting practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and has a proper CPV code. No disputes are reported, suggesting good regulatory compliance. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. The 'Active' status indicates it is current.

Clarity80/100

The description of services required is clear, specifying the type of assessments and the number of premises. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be judged, reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as estimated value, contract duration, and start date are provided. However, the lack of document content for the 5 listed tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full understanding of all requirements and hindering a complete assessment.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are standard and do not appear tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied by the document list, though content is missing.

Practicality65/100

The tender lacks explicit mention of e-submission, which is a common e-procurement standard. While a document URL is not provided, the listing of 5 documents suggests they are intended to be accessible. The contract start date and duration are clear.

No e-submission specified
Data Consistency90/100

All essential fields such as title, reference, organization, deadline, value, and duration are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender. The absence of any indication of EU funding also limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and scope
Open procedure with disclosed value
Well-defined basic tender information (title, ref, org, dates, value)
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing document content for all 5 documents
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Lack of clarity on e-submission process
No explicit sustainability or innovation considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide content for all tender documents to ensure full understanding of requirements.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to guide potential bidders.
3. Specify the e-submission process and platform to enhance practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline