Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of the public municipal road no. 310041T ul. Marcinówka in the town of Bodzechów from km 0+000 to km 0+488

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00172376/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Świętokrzyskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Świętokrzyskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of the public municipal road no. 310041T ul. Marcinówka in the town of Bodzechów from km 0+000 to km 0+488

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b11-e99d-dd13-5fad-950001e70d30.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the reconstruction of the municipal road ul. Marcinówka in Bodzechów, Poland, and requires electronic submission of bids.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline is present, but its reasonableness is questionable given the complexity of road construction projects.

Procedure type not specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specific. The availability of 12 documents, including project documentation and contract templates, enhances clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. A significant number of supporting documents are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible, and the criteria for participation are likely detailed within the provided attachments. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no explicit tailoring to specific companies is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information limits practical assessment for potential bidders. The deadline, while present, might be considered short for a construction project of this nature.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit sustainability criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specific CPV code provided
Extensive set of supporting documents
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline