Reconstruction de la route communale publique n° 310041T ul. Marcinówka dans la localité de Bodzechów de km 0+000 à km 0+488

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline is present, but its reasonableness is questionable given the complexity of road construction projects.

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specific. The availability of 12 documents, including project documentation and contract templates, enhances clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. A significant number of supporting documents are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, impacting overall completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible, and the criteria for participation are likely detailed within the provided attachments. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no explicit tailoring to specific companies is evident.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information limits practical assessment for potential bidders. The deadline, while present, might be considered short for a construction project of this nature.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.