Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of gearboxes

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
308023
Value
€75,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost DAP, Auvere (Incoterms 2020)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€75,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€91,816
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
473 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of gearboxes
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This simplified procurement for reducers prioritizes total cost (100% weight). A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible price while meticulously meeting all technical and submission requirements. Leveraging existing supply chains and efficient operations will be crucial for cost competitiveness.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the lowest total cost of ownership for Enefit Industry OÜ.

Technical Excellence, Delivered Efficiently: Meeting all technical specifications with proven, reliable reducers.

Seamless Compliance: A straightforward and compliant bid that respects Enefit's process.

Key Opportunities
Dominance in Price Evaluation: The 100% weight on total cost presents a significant opportunity for cost-leaders.
Streamlined Technical Documentation: The requirement for specific technical data, specifications, and manufacturer drawings allows for clear demonstration of product suitability.
Green Procurement Alignment: While not heavily weighted, demonstrating environmentally friendly packaging aligns with the 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' flag.
Key Challenges
Intense Price Competition: The 100% cost weighting means any bid not at or very near the lowest price will score poorly.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize supply chain, explore volume discounts, and consider lean manufacturing/operational efficiencies to achieve the lowest possible price without compromising essential quality.

Meeting All Technical Requirements Precisely: In a simplified procurement, any deviation in technical specifications or documentation can lead to disqualification.

Dedicate resources to meticulously review and match all technical data, specifications, and manufacturer drawings against the tender requirements. Employ a technical expert for review before submission.

Simplified Procurement Process Nuances: Misunderstanding or failing to adhere to the specific simplified procurement procedures can lead to errors.

Carefully read and understand the 'Juhised pakkujatele' (Instructions for Bidders) document. If any aspect is unclear, utilize the defined process for requesting clarifications well in advance of the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established supplier of industrial reducers with a proven track record of delivering high-quality products at competitive prices. They should possess efficient manufacturing or sourcing capabilities, robust quality control, and experience with simplified procurement processes and DAP (Delivered At Place) Incoterms. Familiarity with Enefit Industry OÜ's operations and potential existing supplier relationships would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Total bid cost DAP, Auvere (Incoterms 2020)
Provide relevant technical data and drawings
Provide complete technical specifications
Provide manufacturer's drawings
Confirm compliance with tender conditions
Use environmentally friendly packaging
Confirm no exclusion grounds apply
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable lowest total cost of ownership through optimized pricing and efficient delivery.
Exceptional clarity and completeness of technical documentation, exceeding basic requirements.
Proactive engagement with the 'green procurement' aspect through innovative, sustainable packaging solutions.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No' is stated, consider a brief mention of ethical sourcing or workforce development if applicable to your operations, framed as a commitment to responsible business practices, without adding cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost DAP, Auvere (Incoterms 2020)100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price. This requires rigorous cost analysis, supply chain optimization, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. Ensure all costs, including delivery to Auvere (DAP), are accurately factored in. Use the provided formula to understand how your price will be scored relative to the lowest bid.

Recommendations7
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weight on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown, including all direct and indirect costs, and factor in a competitive profit margin. Explore all avenues for cost reduction in sourcing, manufacturing, and logistics.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Technical Documentation
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure all requested technical data, complete specifications, and manufacturer's drawings are provided accurately, completely, and in the required format. Any omissions or inaccuracies can lead to disqualification. Cross-reference all documents against the tender requirements.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review the 'Juhised pakkujatele' and all other tender documents. If any aspect of the requirements, process, or draft contract is unclear, submit a formal request for clarification well in advance of the deadline, following the specified procedure.

Prevents errors and misunderstandings that could jeopardize the bid.
Highlight Environmental Packaging
HighLow effort

While not a primary evaluation criterion, explicitly state and demonstrate the use of environmentally friendly packaging. This aligns with the 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' flag and can serve as a subtle differentiator, showing commitment beyond the minimum requirements.

Adds a positive impression and aligns with the contracting authority's stated interest.
Confirm No Exclusion Grounds
CriticalLow effort

Carefully review all mandatory exclusion grounds and provide a clear, unequivocal confirmation that none apply. This is a non-negotiable requirement.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Understand DAP Incoterms
HighMed effort

Ensure a complete understanding of 'Delivered At Place (DAP), Auvere' Incoterms 2020. This means the seller is responsible for delivering the goods to the named place of destination, Auvere, and bears all risks and costs associated with that delivery, including transport and insurance. All costs must be included in the bid price.

Accurate pricing and fulfillment of delivery obligations.
Review Draft Sales Agreement
HighMed effort

Thoroughly review the 'Müügilepingu projekt' (Draft Sales Agreement). Identify any clauses that may pose a risk or require specific attention during bid preparation or contract negotiation. Note any potential conflicts with your standard terms and conditions.

Proactive identification of contractual risks and opportunities.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective solution without compromising essential technical performance. Emphasize efficiency and value. Highlight the completeness and accuracy of technical documentation as evidence of a professional and reliable supplier. Leverage any existing positive relationship or familiarity with Enefit Industry OÜ's operational needs.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must use environmentally friendly packaging.
--The tender process is a simplified procurement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must confirm that no exclusion grounds apply to them.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must confirm they have familiarized themselves with the procurement authority's rules and guidelines on their website.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide relevant technical data and drawings.
--Bidders must provide complete technical specifications.
--Bidders must provide manufacturer's drawings.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 75,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308023_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.7 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, submit relevant technical data and drawings, and use environmentally friendly packaging.

Pakkumuse vormXLS
Pakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 1.1 MB

The offer form requires the submission of gearbox specifications, quantity, and cost, along with complete technical data and manufacturer drawings.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308023_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
308023_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.9 KB

The bidder must confirm that no exclusion grounds apply to them and that they have familiarized themselves with the procedures and instructions on the contracting authority's website.

Juhised pakkujatelePDF
Juhised pakkujatele_Lihthange_14092022.pdf -- 695.0 KB

This "Instructions for Bidders" document outlines the simplified procurement procedure, the process for requesting clarifications, requirements for submitting and formatting bids, and the contracting authority's rights.

Müügilepingu projektDOC
MÜÜGILEPINGU PROJEKT.docx -- 35.2 KB

The contracting authority Enefit Industry OÜ is seeking reducers, providing a draft contract outlining the goods, deadline, price, payment terms, and delivery conditions.

Müügilepingu üldtingimusedPDF
Muugilepingu_uldtingimused.pdf -- 198.7 KB

These general terms and conditions outline the seller's and buyer's obligations regarding the sales contract, including goods compliance with requirements and actions in case of non-compliance.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for reducers is generally well-structured with clear financial and timeline information, but could benefit from more explicit detail on sustainability and e-submission functionality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures and provides necessary classification codes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of a simplified procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the procedure type, but specific confirmation of no disputes is not explicitly detailed beyond general statistics.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Requirements for exclusion and eligibility are documented. Technical capability requirements are specified, and evaluation criteria are indicated as relative weighting. The existence of draft sales agreements adds clarity to contractual expectations.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the details of financing conditions are referenced as being in the base documents rather than summarized, and a full suite of financial requirements beyond total cost is not explicitly detailed.

Financing conditions not directly summarized.
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible electronically, and the value is disclosed. Evaluation is primarily based on cost, which is objective. There are no explicitly tailored requirements favouring specific companies. The use of e-procurement and electronic submission enhances fairness.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are indicated. The contract start date is specified. Financing conditions are referenced in attached documents. While duration is mentioned, detailed information on how the contract will be managed practically (beyond the sales agreement) is implied to be within base documents.

Specific details on e-submission functionality could be more explicit.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and the tender is not flagged with suspensions or disputes. CPV and NUTS codes are provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific social criteria or innovation focuses detailed within the provided information, and it is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific social and innovation criteria.
No confirmation of EU funding.

Strengths

Clear financial and timeline information
Explicitly mentions e-submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria (cost-based)

Concerns

Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond the mention of green procurement
Financing conditions and some practical contract management details are referenced in attached documents only
Potential ambiguity regarding the extent of e-submission functionality

Recommendations

1. Provide a brief summary of key financing and payment terms within the main tender description.
2. Elaborate on the specific criteria and expected outcomes for 'Green Procurement'.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline