Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login17 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must submit a bid that complies with the contracting authority's conditions, distinguishes business secrets, includes the application form 2, the cost table form 3, and engages a qualified project manager and site manager.
The bidder must provide data on their net turnover for the last three financial years and a list of reference contracts with contact details to prove fulfillment of qualification requirements.
This form is an application to participate in the public procurement, where the bidder confirms compliance with the terms and conformity of the offer.
The bidder must submit a detailed price table for the design and construction works, including the supply and installation of fencing, gate, and access control systems.
The contracting authority requires the submission of Form 4, a CV template, to assess the qualifications of the project manager, site manager, and strong current specialist.
This document is a power of attorney authorizing one company to represent a joint bid for the design and construction tender of the Rapla Savi 2 police building.
The contracting authority will evaluate bids solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
Bidders must confirm they have no exclusion grounds, have a minimum net turnover of EUR 100,000 in each of the last three financial years, and have completed at least two similar fence and gate system installation projects in the last 60 months.
This document outlines the proposal submission process, formatting, and presentation requirements for the public procurement 'Design and construction of fence, gate, and access control systems for Rapla Savi 2 police building', referencing the technical specification and draft contract.
This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific conditions, detailing contractor, client, and site information, as well as the contract execution timeline and warranty period.
The contracting authority is seeking bids for the design and construction of fencing, gate, and access control systems for the Rapla Savi 2 police building, with the technical specification serving as the basis for the works.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for fencing and gate systems at a police building is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process focused on cost. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on specific forms.
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance and fairness.
The description of the need for security fencing and gate systems is clear. Requirements for technical capability and submission are documented through various forms and summaries. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as cost-based.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit details are missing. The tender relies heavily on attached forms for completeness of bidder information.
The tender is fair in that it allows for 'or equivalent' for standards, promoting broader participation. The evaluation is solely on cost, which is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The value is disclosed. There are no obvious tailored requirements to specific companies.
E-submission and e-procurement are positive. However, the reliance on numerous specific forms (Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 8) for submission might add administrative burden. The contract duration is specified, but the contract start date is missing, impacting practical planning.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender valid period aligns with the submission and opening dates.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This category scores low due to the absence of these considerations.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required