Skip to main content
Tenders

Technical studies of Muuga Harbour quays 3A (3O, 3W), 8, 9/10, 9A/10A and the west mole

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307550
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is to carry out construction-technical condition studies of Muuga Harbour quays no. 3A (3O, 3W), 8, 9/10, 9A/10A and the west mole, along with the preparation of study reports. The technical specification is provided in Annex 1 of the Public Procurement Register.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidder must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Bidder must submit the bid price.
--Bidder must comply with environmentally friendly requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have grounds for exclusion as stipulated in RHS § 95.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must have at least one completed contract for the technical condition survey of port facility(ies) within the last 36 months, with a value of at least EUR 30,000 (excluding VAT).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the eligibility requirement for past contracts.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the minimum value of a past contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307550_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents, including submitting the bid price and adhering to environmental requirements.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 307550... -- 46.4 KB

Bidders must submit completed contract data on Form Annex 3, proving at least one construction technical condition survey of port facilities with a total cost of at least EUR 30,000 (excluding VAT) within the last 36 months.

Pakkuja peab lisaks täitma ka hankija ette antud vormi “Pakkumuse maksumuse tabe...XLS
Lisa 4 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel viitenr 3075... -- 17.9 KB

The bidder must submit a completed cost table (Annex 4) with detailed bid costs for the technical surveys of port quays and the west mole.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307550_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307550_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.4 KB

Bidders must confirm they do not meet exclusion grounds as per RHS § 95 and must have completed at least one contract for technical condition surveys of port facilities within the last 36 months, valued at a minimum of €30,000 (excluding VAT).

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimustele tuginem...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.2 KB

This document is a third party's (subcontractor's) consent allowing the bidder to rely on their qualifications in the procurement process.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 307550.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one bidder to submit a bid on behalf of another bidder for the technical surveys of Muuga port quays tender.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) viitenr 307550.pdf -- 296.2 KB

This document presents a proposal for submitting bids for technical surveys of Muuga port quays, outlining tender procedures and bidder qualification requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for technical surveys of Muuga port quays is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer documentation for certain technical specifications.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the services required is clear, and the requirements are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the primary focus on cost could be more detailed. Conditions are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the technical description is in a ZIP file, which is not directly accessible for analysis, potentially impacting completeness. Financing conditions are referenced in the contract project.

Technical description in inaccessible ZIP format.
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and criteria are objective (primarily cost-based). E-procurement is utilized. No specific company tailoring was detected.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are in place. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but implied by the contract duration. Financing information is referenced in the contract project. The duration is specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are populated, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical and consistent within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no explicit social aspects or innovation focuses mentioned, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit social criteria and innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear description of services and objective evaluation criteria (cost-based).
Utilizes e-procurement and e-submission.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.
Mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are clearly defined.

Concerns

Technical description document is in an inaccessible ZIP format.
Lack of explicit details on social aspects and innovation.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all technical documentation is provided in an accessible format.
2. Elaborate on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement' by including social criteria or innovation goals.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline