Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login14 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
5 documents available with AI summaries
The bidder must confirm compliance with tender conditions, submit photos/drawings of product samples, warranty terms, and confirm that the goods are not subject to sanctions.
Bidders must submit a form detailing the cost, installation, and delivery of sorting stations to participate in the Võru municipality tender.
The tender evaluates the total cost of sorting stations, where the bidder with the lowest offer receives the maximum score.
The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a European unified procurement document serving as an initial self-declaration by the bidder, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is intended for familiarization, not direct completion.
The Võru Municipal Government is seeking bids for the procurement of sorting stations for its general education schools, specifying required quantities and delivery addresses.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for sorting stations for schools in Võru municipality is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and a more streamlined submission process.
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The financing condition is clearly stated. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (VO) is indicated.
The description of the required sorting stations is clear, and the technical specification is referenced in the tender documents. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as price-based. The 'or equivalent' clause is a positive indicator of clarity regarding technical specifications.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' without disclosing the actual value might be a minor point of concern for full transparency, although the estimated value is provided. Key documents like the technical specification and cost form are referenced.
The evaluation is primarily based on price, which is an objective criterion. The 'or equivalent' clause promotes fairness by not unduly restricting competition. The use of e-procurement is indicated. No specific company tailoring is evident.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are mentioned, which is positive. However, the specific URL for document access is not provided in the basic information, and the financing condition (payment in one installment after completion) is clear but might not be ideal for all potential bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the delivery deadline post-award.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logical and sequential. No suspension or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.
The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step. However, there are no specific social criteria or innovation focus detailed in the provided information. It is not explicitly stated if the tender is EU funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required