Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of a 2+2 highway on the Käsukonna-Imavere section of the national road 2 (E263) from km 99.1 to 107.1

Open
Deadline
38 days left
May 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307319
Value
€39,200,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of construction of the 2+2 highway section Käsukonna-Imavere on national road 2 (E263) Tallinn-Tartu-Võru-Luhamaa road km 99.1-107.1100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 12, 2026

Tender Opening

May 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€39,200,000
Duration
33 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of a 2+2 highway on the Käsukonna-Imavere section of the national road 2 (E263) from km 99.1 to 107.1 in accordance with the conditions set out in the tender documents.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a 2+2 highway section construction requires a strong focus on technical capability and cost-effectiveness, given the absence of specified evaluation criteria. Bidders must demonstrate robust project management, a clear understanding of technical specifications, and competitive pricing to secure this significant infrastructure project.

Key Winning Messages

Proven Expertise in Large-Scale Highway Construction: Highlight a history of successfully delivering complex road infrastructure projects on time and within budget.

Cost-Effective and Efficient Project Delivery: Emphasize a lean operational model and optimized resource allocation to present a highly competitive price.

Proactive Risk Management and Collaboration: Showcase a structured approach to identifying and mitigating project risks, including seamless coordination with utility providers.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging existing relationships with Elektrilevi for seamless network construction.
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the technical specifications (HD III-1 Teetööde tehnilise kirjelduse eritingimused) to build confidence in execution.
Presenting a highly competitive and well-justified cost estimate due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria, making price a likely dominant factor.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult to optimize the bid beyond price and basic compliance.

Focus on delivering a technically sound and compliant bid with a highly competitive price. Ensure all mandatory requirements are met flawlessly. Assume price will be a significant, if not the primary, evaluation factor.

Potential for high competition from established road construction firms.

Thoroughly research potential competitors. Differentiate through demonstrated efficiency, innovative (though not explicitly requested) construction methods that reduce cost or time, and a strong emphasis on project management.

Ensuring full compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.

Conduct a rigorous internal review of all exclusion grounds and eligibility criteria. Prepare all required documentation well in advance, and seek legal counsel if any ambiguity exists.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering contractor with a proven track record in large-scale road construction projects, particularly highways. The ideal bidder possesses strong financial standing, efficient project management capabilities, established relationships with utility providers (like Elektrilevi), and a commitment to quality and timely delivery.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Completed Cost Estimate in Excel format
Bid Security of EUR 100,000
Agreement with Tender Notice Conditions
Technical Capability for 2+2 Highway Construction
Cooperation Agreement with Elektrilevi
Key Discriminators
Exceptional project management methodology that demonstrably leads to cost savings and schedule adherence.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that justifies the proposed price and highlights efficiencies.
A proactive approach to stakeholder engagement, particularly with Elektrilevi, showcasing a streamlined coordination process.
Social Value Opportunities
While social aspects are not explicitly requested, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment and skills development, framing it as a benefit to the community and a demonstration of responsible corporate citizenship. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Price/Cost

Develop a highly competitive and well-supported cost estimate. Benchmark against industry standards and internal cost models to ensure optimal pricing without compromising quality or profitability. Focus on demonstrating value for money.

Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of past experience in similar 2+2 highway projects. Clearly articulate the proposed construction methodology, resource allocation, and quality assurance processes, directly referencing the technical specifications.

Compliance

Ensure 100% adherence to all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and submission guidelines. A flawless compliance record is paramount.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specifications
CriticalHigh effort

Deeply understand the 'HD III-1 Teetööde tehnilise kirjelduse eritingimused' to tailor the technical proposal and cost estimate accurately. Identify any potential ambiguities or areas for clarification.

Ensures a compliant and technically superior bid, reducing risk of rejection and increasing perceived competence.
Optimize Cost Estimate for Competitiveness
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume price will be a primary factor. Develop a detailed, accurate, and highly competitive cost estimate in the required Excel format, ensuring all direct and indirect costs are accounted for, and efficiencies are highlighted.

Directly influences the likelihood of winning if price is a dominant factor.
Demonstrate Proactive Elektrilevi Coordination
HighMed effort

Detail the proposed approach for cooperating with Elektrilevi, including timelines, communication protocols, and how potential disruptions will be minimized. This shows foresight and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.

Sets the bid apart by addressing a specific mentioned requirement and demonstrating operational readiness.
Rigorous Compliance Check
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a comprehensive review of all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all documentation is complete, accurate, and submitted in the correct format to avoid disqualification.

Prevents immediate disqualification and ensures the bid is considered on its merits.
Integrate Subtle Social Value Commitments
LowLow effort

While not mandatory, consider including commitments to local employment or sustainable material sourcing. Frame these as contributing to project efficiency or community benefit, adding a positive layer to the bid.

May provide a slight edge if competitors ignore it, and enhances corporate image.
Develop a Robust Project Management Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a clear and effective project management plan that addresses potential risks, timelines, resource allocation, and quality control. This demonstrates capability and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver the project successfully.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on technical excellence or timely delivery. Emphasize efficiency and proven project management to counter potential competitors with lower overheads but less experience. Highlight the seamless integration with Elektrilevi as a key operational advantage.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is published in the e-procurement environment.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-05-12 09:00:00.
--The contract award date is indicative and not binding.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Grounds for exclusion of the tenderer are published in the e-procurement environment.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the conditions of the tender notice.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost estimate in Excel.
--Bidders must provide a bid security of EUR 100,000.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for the construction of a 2+2 highway section.
--The construction works are described in the technical specifications and preparatory works in the cost estimate document.
--Cooperation agreement for network construction with Elektrilevi is mentioned.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is EUR 39,200,000.0.
--Bid security of EUR 100,000 is required.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307319_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors related to criminal convictions.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307319_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

Bidders must confirm agreement with tender notice conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and provide a bid security of EUR 100,000.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 50.5 KB

The tender document includes a cost breakdown detailing road maintenance technical specifications and preparation works, forming part of the general tender conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307319_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluates the cost of the bid, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307319_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 76.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

HD V Kolmepoolne leping võrgu ehitamiseks (Elektrilevi)DOC
HD V Kolmepoolse koostoolepingu vorm võrgu eh... -- 48.0 KB

This document is a cooperation agreement for network construction, defining the rights and obligations of the Client, Network Operator, and Contractor in carrying out construction works.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.2 KB

The Transport Administration is conducting a public procurement for the construction of a 2+2 highway section Käsukonna-Imavere, with bidder exclusion grounds and qualification requirements published on the e-procurement environment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for highway construction is generally well-structured with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks specific details on social and innovation aspects, and some document formats are not AI-analyzable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is indicated as 'A' (Open procedure), which is standard. No disputes are noted. The contract start date is provided, and the duration is specified.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, referencing detailed technical specifications in the tender documents. Requirements are generally documented, and evaluation criteria (relative weighting) are mentioned, though the specific weighting is not detailed here. Conditions for agreement are stated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration. However, some crucial documents (HD I Vormid, HD III-1 Teetööde tehnilise kirjelduse eritingimused, HD II Hankelepingu projekt) are in .zip format and could not be analyzed, potentially impacting completeness assessment. The location is vaguely defined as 'Täpne piirkond määramata'.

Some key documents are in unanalyzable .zip format.
Location information is vague.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are based on relative weighting, suggesting objectivity. The bid security requirement is substantial but standard for this value. No obvious tailoring to specific companies is apparent.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. A contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The duration is specified in months. The URL for the opening place is provided.

Specific financing details beyond estimated value are not readily apparent.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, with the reveal date preceding the submission and opening dates. No suspension or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, no specific social aspects or innovation focus are detailed in the provided information. It is also marked as 'EU Funded'.

Lack of specific details on social criteria and innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear financial and timeline information.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Standardized CPV code and open procedure.
Disclosure of estimated value.

Concerns

Some key tender documents are in unanalyzable formats (.zip).
Vague location information.
Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible and analyzable formats.
2. Provide more specific details regarding the implementation of green procurement and any social or innovation objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline