Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Painting of Järveküla Sports Hall Stadium

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307029
Value
€40,323
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€40,323
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the procurement is to carry out renovation works on the tartan surface of the Järveküla Sports Hall stadium. NB! Site visit is a prerequisite for submitting a bid. An appointment can be arranged with the Peetri district manager Marek Sooäär (tel: 5553 2551, e-mail: marek@raespordikeskus.ee). Participation in the site visit must be registered on-site between 01.04 - 10.04.2026.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Järveküla sports hall stadium tartan surface renovation is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive bid while meticulously demonstrating technical capability and adherence to World Athletics standards. Proactive engagement with the site visit and thorough understanding of the technical drawings are paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering a high-quality, compliant tartan surface renovation at the most competitive price.

Proven Expertise: Demonstrating a track record of successful sports facility renovations adhering to international standards.

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 100% price weighting to secure maximum evaluation points.
Gain detailed site-specific insights during the mandatory site visit to refine costings and scope.
Thoroughly analyze the stadium drawings (Staadioni joonis.pdf) to ensure precise scope definition and avoid cost overruns.
Utilize the Hankepass (ESPD) to efficiently demonstrate compliance with eligibility and technical requirements.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct a detailed cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, and streamline labor to achieve the lowest possible bid without compromising quality. Explore economies of scale if applicable.

Potential for scope creep or misinterpretation of technical specifications if drawings are not fully understood.

Dedicate significant time to analyzing 'Staadioni joonis.pdf' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. If any ambiguity exists, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority during the designated period.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements, including site visit registration and Hankepass completion, are met precisely by the deadline.

Establish a clear internal checklist and assign responsibility for each submission requirement. Schedule reminders for the site visit registration and submission deadlines.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized sports surface contractor with proven experience in tartan track renovation and line marking according to international standards. The ideal bidder possesses efficient operational processes to minimize costs and a strong understanding of material procurement to offer a competitive price.
Key Requirements
Familiarity with the site (mandatory site visit registration)
Technical capability for tartan surface renovation and line marking per World Athletics rules
Compliance with all tender conditions and submission requirements (Hankepass, contract agreement)
Understanding of the exact scope and location of painting works (Staadioni joonis.pdf)
Lowest bid cost for maximum evaluation score
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a deep understanding of World Athletics lining standards and the ability to execute them flawlessly.
Presenting a highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that justifies the competitive pricing.
Providing evidence of past successful tartan track renovations with minimal defects and excellent client feedback (even if not explicitly requested, it can be a strong implicit differentiator).
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a brief mention of using locally sourced materials where feasible, or employing local labor for specific tasks, to demonstrate a commitment to the community, even if it doesn't directly impact the score.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing all cost components: materials, labor, equipment, and overhead. Conduct thorough market research on material costs and labor rates. Ensure efficient project planning to minimize project duration and associated costs.

Recommendations7
Mandatory Site Visit Registration and Attendance
CriticalMed effort

Ensure timely registration for the site visit between 01.04 and 10.04.2026 and attend the visit to gain critical on-site knowledge. This is a prerequisite for submission.

Enables bid submission and provides crucial context for accurate pricing and scope understanding.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price weighting, develop a highly competitive bid. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract.

Maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Thorough Analysis of Technical Drawings
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to understanding 'Staadioni joonis.pdf' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. Identify all painting areas, dimensions, and specific requirements to ensure a precise and cost-effective proposal.

Prevents scope misinterpretation, ensures technical compliance, and supports accurate pricing.
Accurate Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
HighMed effort

Complete the Hankepass (ESPD) accurately and comprehensively, ensuring all eligibility and qualification criteria are met. Double-check all entries before submission.

Ensures the bid is not disqualified on administrative grounds.
Proactive Clarification Seeking
HighLow effort

If any aspect of the technical specifications or drawings is unclear, do not hesitate to seek clarification from the contracting authority within the designated period. This demonstrates diligence and avoids potential disputes later.

Reduces risk of errors, misunderstandings, and potential cost overruns.
Highlight World Athletics Compliance Expertise
MediumLow effort

While not explicitly a scoring criterion, subtly emphasize the company's proven ability to meet World Athletics standards for line marking. This builds confidence in technical capability.

Builds trust and reinforces technical competence, especially if competitors are less specialized.
Consider Local Sourcing/Employment Mention
LowLow effort

If feasible and without impacting cost significantly, briefly mention any local sourcing or employment practices to align with broader public procurement expectations, even if not scored.

Minor positive perception, potentially useful in tie-breaking scenarios or for future tenders.
Competitive Positioning
Focus on demonstrating that your aggressive pricing is not at the expense of quality or compliance. Highlight your efficiency and expertise in sports surface renovation to assure the contracting authority of a reliable outcome, even with the lowest bid.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The initial proof of a company's qualification and compliance with tender conditions is to be filled out electronically (Hankepass).
--The bidder must sign the contract agreement for the painting works of Järveküla sports hall stadium.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-15 11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm familiarity with the site.
--Bidders must accept the tender conditions.
--Bidders must confirm their bid complies with requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for renovation works of the Tartan surface of Järveküla sports hall stadium.
--Works include preparation, installation of a new surface, and lining the stadium according to World Athletics rules.
--Understanding the exact scope and location of painting works is required (refer to Staadioni joonis.pdf).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid will be evaluated based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307029_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, acceptance of terms, bid compliance, and clarification of equivalency to submit a valid offer.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307029_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307029_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.6 KB

The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt Järveküla spordihoone st... -- 31.2 KB

The draft contract project outlines the terms of the works contract for painting the Järveküla sports hall stadium, which the contractor must sign.

Staadioni joonisPDF
Staadioni joonis.pdf -- 610.3 KB

The stadium drawing is necessary to understand the exact scope and location of the painting works.

Staadioni maaameti kaartDOC
Staadioni maaameti kaart.docx -- 1.9 MB

This document contains the stadium land survey map, which is necessary for participating in the tender for painting the sports hall stadium in Rae municipality.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 517.0 KB

The contracting authority seeks a bid for the renovation of the Järveküla sports hall stadium's tartan surface, including preparation, new surface installation, and line marking according to World Athletics rules.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for stadium painting is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on a mandatory site visit which could be a minor barrier.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. The financing condition is clearly stated. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (VO) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are provided. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, implying a clear method. The requirement for a site visit is also clearly communicated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the technical description and draft contract are attached. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is in an XML format not directly analyzable, and the 'Staadioni joonis' and 'Staadioni maaameti kaart' are marked as not required, which could be a point of confusion.

ESPD document format not directly analyzable.
Non-required but potentially important documents (Staadioni joonis, Staadioni maaameti kaart) are not mandatory.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation is based on the lowest price, which is objective. Full document access is implied. The mandatory site visit, while practical for understanding the scope, could be seen as a minor hurdle for some potential bidders if not managed efficiently.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract duration and start period are specified. Financing conditions are clear. However, the mandatory site visit registration period (01.04 - 10.04.2026) is quite specific and might limit flexibility for some bidders.

Specific and potentially restrictive window for mandatory site visit registration.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This is a missed opportunity to incorporate broader societal benefits.

Lack of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear technical requirements and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Standard e-procurement process.
Well-defined timeline and financial terms.

Concerns

No explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.
Mandatory site visit with a specific registration window.
ESPD document in an unanalyzable format.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., eco-friendly materials, waste reduction) in future tenders.
2. Consider offering more flexibility for site visits or providing detailed virtual tours.
3. Ensure all essential documents are in a universally analyzable format.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline