Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of sewage pipelines using the CIPP method

Open
Deadline
47 days left
May 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306891
Value
€15,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 14, 2026

Tender Opening

May 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€15,000,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this framework agreement is the reconstruction of sewage pipelines (including design if necessary) using the trenchless (CIPP) method.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids will be evaluated solely on cost.
--The tender is for a framework agreement with subsequent mini-competitions.
--References to standards or other bases in the public procurement documents are to be read as supplemented by "or equivalent".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have criminal convictions related to money laundering, terrorist financing, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--If relying on third-party resources, the third party's place of residence or establishment must be in Estonia, another EU member state, an EEA contracting state, or a WTO GPA member state.
--For joint bids, a power of attorney is required to authorize one party to represent all participants.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate the ability to reconstruct pipelines using the CIPP method.
--Bidders must provide detailed costs for works and materials for CIPP Sector 41.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed, but implied by the need to provide cost breakdowns.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306891_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for money laundering, terrorism financing, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306891_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

This compliance conditions document clarifies rules for submitting joint bids, requirements for presenting bid costs, and restrictions on marking trade secrets.

Pakkumuse maksumusXLS
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm CIPP Sektor 4... -- 38.7 KB

The contracting authority AS Tallinna Vesi is seeking bids for the reconstruction of sewage pipelines using the CIPP method, requiring detailed cost breakdowns for labor and materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306891_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority AKTSIASELTS TALLINNA VESI evaluates bids for the reconstruction of sewage pipelines using the CIPP method, where the sole evaluation criterion is the bid price.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306891_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 41.0 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the contractor, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

Teise ettevõtja nõusolek tema vahenditele tuginemiseksDOC
Teise ettevõtja nõusolek tema vahenditele tug... -- 54.1 KB

This document is a consent for utilizing another company's resources in the tender, confirming their economic, financial, and technical competence and willingness to participate in contract execution.

Ühispakkuja volikiriDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 64.1 KB

This power of attorney is required from joint bidders to authorize one party to represent all in the tender process and contract signing.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for sewage pipeline reconstruction using the CIPP method is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion (price). However, it lacks explicit detail on financial requirements and innovation, and the reliance on subsequent mini-competitions might impact long-term planning for bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are specified and seem reasonable. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance. No explicit disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service (CIPP method reconstruction) is clear. Requirements for technical capability and submission are documented. The evaluation criterion (price) is explicitly stated. The conditions for joint bids and third-party reliance are also clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, financial requirements are not explicitly detailed beyond the need for cost breakdowns, and the financing condition refers to external documents. The framework agreement structure with mini-competitions is explained, but this could be more detailed.

Financial requirements not explicitly detailed beyond cost breakdowns.
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair in its approach, with full document access implied and the value disclosed. The evaluation criterion being solely price is objective. The use of e-submission and e-procurement enhances fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified, which is practical. The contract start date is provided. However, the financing condition is vague, referring to external documents. The framework agreement with mini-competitions, while common, can add complexity to practical execution for bidders.

Financing condition refers to external documents, lacking direct detail.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, which is positive. However, there is no specific detail on how these will be implemented or evaluated, and it is not indicated as EU funded, limiting the score in this category.

Lack of specific details on how green and social criteria will be applied or evaluated.

Strengths

Clear technical requirements and evaluation criterion (price).
Use of e-submission and e-procurement.
Explicit mention of 'or equivalent' for standards.
Framework agreement structure with subsequent mini-competitions is explained.

Concerns

Financial requirements are not explicitly detailed.
Lack of specific details on sustainability criteria implementation.
Framework agreement structure might add complexity for bidders.

Recommendations

1. Provide more explicit details on financial requirements and expected cost breakdowns.
2. Elaborate on the specific implementation and evaluation of green and social criteria.
3. Consider providing a more detailed overview of the mini-competition process within the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline