Skip to main content
Tenders

Consultation services for objects requiring renovation

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306815
Value
€460,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 05, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Consultancy services for objects requiring renovation100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€460,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a framework agreement with one supplier for the provision of engineering consulting services to assess the condition of roads and pathways and to develop restoration and repair solutions, in accordance with the public procurement documents.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit bid cost according to the prescribed form (Lisa 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vorm.xlsx).
--Confirm that the bid meets all tender document conditions (306815_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The tender is not divided into lots, implying a single contractor is expected.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Compliance with Public Procurement Act (RHS).
--No alternative solutions are allowed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidder must confirm that their bid meets all tender document conditions.
--Bidder must confirm compliance with anti-corruption measures.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Service provider sought for assessing the condition of objects requiring renovation.
--Service provider sought for developing repair solutions for objects requiring renovation.
--Services must comply with current legislation and standards.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidder must submit their bid cost according to the prescribed form.
--Bid cost must include all direct and indirect costs necessary for contract performance.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306815_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all tender document conditions, including anti-corruption measures, and submit the cost according to the specified format.

Lisa 2. Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vormXLS
Lisa 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildis... -- 18.6 KB

The bidder must submit their tender cost according to the form, including all direct and indirect costs necessary for contract fulfillment.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306815_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306815_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.6 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions, including explanations and legal references.

Lisa 1. Teenuse tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Teenuse tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 51.9 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider to assess the condition of objects requiring repair and develop repair solutions, adhering to applicable legislation and standards.

Lisa 3. Raamlepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 51.2 KB

This document is a framework agreement for ordering consultancy services for objects requiring renovation, establishing the contract terms and annexes resulting from the public procurement.

RHADDOC
RHAD.docx -- 53.1 KB

This general part of the tender foundation document outlines the conditions and requirements for an open procurement procedure, including compliance with the Public Procurement Act, submission of clarification requests, and the non-allowance of alternative solutions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for consultancy services related to renovation objects is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a single evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard public procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure type (A) and framework agreement type (WITHOUT_REOPENING_COMPETITION) are clearly stated. No immediate legal compliance issues are apparent, but the absence of explicit dispute information in the provided data limits a full assessment.

Clarity80/100

The tender's objective is clearly described: consultancy services for assessing and developing repair solutions for renovation objects. Requirements are documented through various attached files, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is specified. Conditions are generally clear, although the 'Additional Info' section regarding contract start date flexibility could be more precisely defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the 'Vastavustingimused' and 'Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vorm' are marked as required. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is not directly usable by AI, and the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' document is marked as not required, which is unusual given it's the sole evaluation criterion.

ESPD document format not AI-analyzable
Evaluation criteria document marked as not required
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The criteria are objective (lowest price). The requirement for a single contractor is explained as reducing administrative burden, which is a reasonable justification. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. While document URLs are not explicitly provided for all documents, the opening place is a link to the national e-procurement portal. The contract start date is specified, and financing information is implicitly covered by the estimated value. The duration is clearly stated. However, the AI could not access the content of the ESPD XML file.

AI could not access ESPD XML content
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This aspect is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear objective and scope
Single, objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
E-procurement enabled
Reasonable deadlines and value disclosure

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
ESPD document format not AI-analyzable
Ambiguity in contract start date flexibility

Recommendations

1. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement, social aspects).
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and analyzable by standard procurement platforms.
3. Clarify the conditions under which the contract start date might deviate from the stated date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline