Skip to main content
Tenders

Factory reconstruction design and construction contract for apartment building at Männiku tn 3, Voka settlement, Toila Parish (EIS)

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306803
Value
€2,198,951
Location
Estonia
Published
March 04, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Toila municipality, Voka settlement, Männiku st 3 apartment building prefabricated reconstruction design-build contract100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€2,198,951
Duration
18 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Factory reconstruction design and construction contract for apartment building at Männiku tn 3, Voka settlement, Toila Parish (EIS). The procurement procedure is organized by EIS. See attached documents for the procurement procedure for more details.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The tender cannot be divided into parts.
--Bid price must be submitted on the beneficiary's prepared bid form.
--Joint bidders must provide power of attorney and proof of representation if needed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must submit confirmations and evidence that they meet the exclusion grounds and qualification requirements.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm compliance with the conditions set out in the procurement documents.
--Bidders must submit the bid price on the bid form prepared by the beneficiary.
--Joint bidders must submit power of attorney and proof of representation if necessary.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the design and construction of a prefabricated reconstruction of an apartment building.
--The scope includes design and construction works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted on the provided bid form.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306803_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.2 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with the terms set out in the procurement documents, submit the bid price on the beneficiary's prepared bid form, and provide a power of attorney for joint bidders and proof of representation rights if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306803_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.4 KB

The tender evaluates the cost of the bid, where the lowest price receives maximum points, and this document outlines the evaluation criteria and their weighting.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306803_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 23.9 KB

Bidders must provide confirmations and evidence that they meet exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, including required business registry entries.

LepingDOC
Ehituse töövõtu ja projekteerimise leping Män... -- 73.1 KB

This document outlines general contract terms, definitions, and conditions necessary for submitting a bid for the reconstruction project of an apartment building.

Link lisadokumentidele, Männiku tn 3DOC
Link lisadokumentidele, Männiku tn 3.docx -- 13.8 KB

This document contains links to additional documents required for submitting a bid for the design and construction contract of the Männiku tn 3 apartment building reconstruction.

PakkumuskutsePDF
Pakkumuskutse, projekt+rek 2026.pdf -- 451.7 KB

This invitation to tender calls for bids for the design and reconstruction of an apartment building, clarifying the procurement procedure and referencing information published in the public procurement register.

Pakkumusvorm, Männiku tn 3XLS
Pakkumusvorm Männiku tn 3.xlsx -- 40.1 KB

The offer form for the Männiku tn 3 apartment building reconstruction design-build tender, including a price table and demolition work descriptions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of an apartment building in Estonia is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it could benefit from more explicit details on sustainability and innovation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached documents. The evaluation criteria, while weighted, are stated to be primarily based on the lowest price, which is a clear condition.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and tender validity. However, the AI could not analyze one crucial document (.asice format), potentially impacting the completeness of the AI's understanding of all requirements.

One critical document (.asice format) could not be analyzed by AI, potentially impacting completeness assessment.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (lowest price). E-procurement is utilized, and deadlines are reasonable. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while financing is detailed, the exact source of the 'own financing' is not specified beyond a percentage. The duration is clear.

Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period aligns with the opening and submission dates.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific details or weighting for social aspects, innovation, or explicit EU funding beyond the general mention.

Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation within the procurement characteristics.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Well-defined CPV code and location.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable submission and opening deadlines.

Concerns

One critical document format (.asice) not analyzed by AI.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Limited specific details on sustainability and innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all document formats are accessible for comprehensive AI analysis in future tenders.
2. Explicitly state the contract start date for improved clarity.
3. Provide more detailed criteria for green procurement, social aspects, and innovation to enhance sustainability scoring.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline