Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and construction of drainage system for Aseri and Sõpruse residential areas in Aseri village

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306775
Value
€381,500
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the bid100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€381,500
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to design and build rainwater and drainage systems in the Aseri and Sõpruse residential areas (former Aseri and Sõpruse horticultural associations) in Aseri village.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires a strong focus on cost-competitiveness and robust technical capability in drainage system design and construction. Bidders must demonstrate a clear understanding of the project scope, adhere strictly to eligibility and technical requirements, and present a highly competitive price to secure this contract.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective and Compliant Solution for Aseri Drainage Systems

Proven Expertise in Water and Sewerage Infrastructure Delivery

Key Opportunities
The tender is for a relatively modest value (381,500 EUR) and a short duration (7 months), making it attractive for smaller to medium-sized specialized firms.
The absence of specified evaluation criteria beyond cost implies that the lowest price will be the primary determinant of success, allowing for aggressive pricing strategies.
The requirement for a Hankepass (ESPD) simplifies initial evidence submission, allowing bidders to focus on the core technical and pricing aspects.
Key Challenges
The primary evaluation criterion is lowest price, which can lead to intense price competition and pressure on profit margins.

Develop a highly efficient project execution plan and cost structure. Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify areas for optimization without compromising quality or safety. Consider economies of scale if applicable to other ongoing projects.

Strict adherence to technical capability requirements for key personnel (Site Manager, Design Project Manager, Project Manager) requires careful selection and validation of CVs.

Proactively identify and secure qualified personnel whose CVs meet all specified criteria, including education, experience (especially in public water supply and sewerage), and language proficiency. Prepare supporting documentation to validate claims.

The mandatory exclusion ground regarding Russian Federation connections requires diligent due diligence of all potential subcontractors and suppliers.

Establish a clear internal policy and verification process for all third-party engagements to ensure compliance. Maintain a list of approved, compliant suppliers and subcontractors.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering firm with a proven track record in public water and sewerage infrastructure projects, possessing a strong team of qualified project managers and site managers, and a demonstrated ability to deliver projects within budget and on time. The firm should have a streamlined procurement process to avoid Russian Federation-linked subcontractors.
Key Requirements
Submission of Hankepass (ESPD) as initial evidence.
CV of Site Manager demonstrating relevant education, experience, and language skills.
CV of Design Project Manager with Master's degree and responsible specialist registration.
CV of Project Manager with at least 5 years of water supply and sewerage project management experience.
Confirmation of net turnover for previous periods.
Detailed price offer and bill of quantities, including restoration costs.
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Key Discriminators
A highly competitive and detailed price offer that clearly outlines cost efficiencies and value for money.
Demonstrated experience in similar-sized drainage system projects in Estonia, with strong local knowledge.
A proactive and transparent approach to project management, with clear communication channels established from the outset.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities for residents of Aseri township, if feasible within the project scope and budget. This can be a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Total CostMaximum Score for Lowest Price

Develop a highly competitive and detailed price offer. Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and ensure all direct and indirect costs, including restoration, are accurately accounted for. Explore opportunities for cost savings through efficient design and construction methods.

Technical Capability (Personnel)

Ensure all submitted CVs for the Site Manager, Design Project Manager, and Project Manager meet or exceed the specified education, experience (especially in water/sewerage), and language requirements. Highlight relevant past projects and certifications.

Eligibility and Compliance

Meticulously complete the Hankepass (ESPD) and all other required documentation. Strictly adhere to the exclusion grounds regarding Russian Federation connections. Ensure all information provided is accurate and verifiable.

Recommendations6
Thorough Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, as it serves as the primary evidence for eligibility. Pay close attention to the specified response format and any additional clarifications provided.

Ensures bidder is not disqualified on administrative grounds.
Aggressive but Realistic Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given that cost is the primary evaluation criterion, develop a highly competitive price. This requires detailed cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting lower margins. Ensure all costs, including potential unforeseen issues and restoration, are factored in.

Maximizes score for the cost criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Validate Key Personnel CVs
CriticalMed effort

Proactively gather and verify CVs for the Site Manager, Design Project Manager, and Project Manager. Ensure they meet all educational, experience (especially in public water supply and sewerage construction), and language requirements. Prepare supporting documentation if necessary.

Meets critical technical capability requirements, avoiding disqualification.
Subcontractor Due Diligence
CriticalMed effort

Implement a rigorous process to vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure they have no connections to the Russian Federation. Document this process and the vetting outcomes.

Avoids mandatory exclusion from the tender.
Detailed Project Execution Plan
HighMed effort

While not explicitly requested as a standalone document, a clear and concise project execution plan within the price offer or as an appendix can demonstrate efficiency and understanding of the project's challenges. Highlight how the 7-month duration will be met.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver on time and within budget.
Consider Local Engagement
LowLow effort

If feasible, subtly mention any potential for local employment or engagement within the Aseri community as part of the project delivery, even if not a formal requirement. This can add a positive, albeit minor, impression.

Slightly enhances bidder's image, potentially a tie-breaker in very close bids.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective and compliant solution, backed by proven technical expertise in similar projects. Emphasize efficiency and reliability in project delivery to counter potential price-driven competitors.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bidders must submit a detailed price offer and bill of quantities for the design and construction works, including details of all works and restoration costs.
--The tender is for the design and construction of drainage systems in the Aseri and Sõpruse residential areas of Aseri township.
--The total value of the tender is 381,500.0 EUR.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide information regarding business secrets.
--For joint bids, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must submit a Hankepass (tender pass) as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, adhering to the specified conditions and response format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit the CV of the Site Manager, proving compliance with education, work experience, and language requirements, including experience in public water supply and sewerage construction projects.
--Bidders must submit the CV of the Design Project Manager, proving compliance with education, language proficiency, and work experience requirements, including at least a Master's degree in construction or water management and registration as a responsible specialist.
--Bidders must submit the CV of the Project Manager, proving compliance with education, language proficiency, work experience, and reference project requirements, including at least 5 years of experience as a water supply and sewerage project manager.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit confirmation of their net turnover for previous periods according to the provided form.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306775_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.2 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and provide information on trade secrets and power of attorney for joint bids.

Lisa 3 Hinnapakkumus ja töömahu loendXLS
Lisa 3 Hinnapakkumus ja töömahu loend.xlsx -- 12.3 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed price and scope of work list for design and construction services, including breakdowns for all tasks and restoration costs.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306775_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306775_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 42.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Lisa 2 Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 57.2 KB

This document is a draft of the contractor agreement, outlining the terms, deadlines, and contractual documents for design and construction works, including annexes such as schedules and guarantees.

Lisa 4 CV ObjektijuhtDOC
Lisa 4 CV objektijuht.docx -- 30.2 KB

Bidders must submit the Site Manager's CV, demonstrating compliance with educational, work experience, and language requirements, including experience in public water and sewage construction projects.

Lisa 5 CV projekteerimise projektijuhtDOC
Lisa 5 CV projekteerimise projektijuht.docx -- 30.1 KB

Bidders must submit a CV for the design project manager demonstrating compliance with education, language proficiency, and work experience requirements, including at least a Master's degree in construction or water management and registration as a responsible specialist.

Lisa 6 CV projektijuhtDOC
Lisa 6 CV Projektijuht.docx -- 30.4 KB

Bidders must submit a Project Manager's CV demonstrating compliance with educational, language proficiency, work experience, and reference project requirements, including at least 5 years of experience as a water supply and sewerage project manager.

Lisa 7 pakkuja käiveDOC
Lisa 7 Pakkuja käive.docx -- 25.7 KB

The bidder must provide confirmation of their net turnover from previous periods according to the provided form.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for drainage system design and construction in Aseri is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The financing condition (KIK 70%) is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements for technical capability (CVs for project managers) are well-documented. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with cost being the primary factor.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is in an XML format not directly analyzable by AI, and the 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' is marked as not required, which might lead to confusion.

XML format for ESPD not directly analyzable.
Ambiguity regarding the requirement of 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (cost-based evaluation). The exclusion of subcontractors linked to the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical requirement but does not appear to unfairly target specific companies within the EU market. Access to documents is generally good, though the XML ESPD is a minor hurdle.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is specified. Financing information (KIK 70%) is provided. However, the URL for accessing all tender documents is not explicitly provided within the basic information, requiring users to navigate to the full tender listing.

Lack of a direct URL for all tender documents in the basic information.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are consistent and follow a logical progression.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which often implies a higher focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Well-defined technical capability requirements (CVs).
Objective evaluation criteria (cost-based).
E-procurement and e-submission.
Clear financing condition stated.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Potential ambiguity regarding the 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' requirement.
XML format for ESPD may pose accessibility issues for some bidders.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact mitigation, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
2. Clarify the requirement and purpose of 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' to avoid bidder confusion.
3. Provide a direct link to all tender documents for enhanced accessibility.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline