Skip to main content
Tenders

Project "Implementation of inclusive education principles in Tallinn schools II"

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306711
Value
€1,863,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid amount100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,863,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Project "Implementation of inclusive education principles in Tallinn schools II"
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit an accurate price offer according to the provided form.
--Bidders must provide a construction works schedule.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Subcontractor background checks for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must provide MTR registration.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must provide a construction works schedule.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit an accurate price offer according to the provided form.
--The main evaluation criterion is the total cost of the offer, with the lowest value receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306711_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306711_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 67.2 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, submit an accurate price offer according to the provided form, prepare a construction work schedule, and prove necessary MTR registration.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306711_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 11.1 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the primary weight is given to the total bid amount, with the lowest value receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306711_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 92.9 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and requirements, but it is not filled out directly in PDF format.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for educational principles implementation in Tallinn schools is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable submission deadline. However, it lacks specific details on contract duration and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified, although the 'relative_weighting' could be more detailed. Conditions for compliance are generally understandable.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and a submission deadline. However, the contract duration is missing, which impacts completeness. A significant number of documents are provided, though some are in unsupported formats for AI analysis.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective, and e-procurement is utilized. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The financing condition is clear. However, the absence of a specified contract start date and the lack of explicit contract duration limit practicality. The URL for opening is provided.

Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is clear.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded, this is stated as a financing condition rather than a specific sustainability focus within the tender's objectives.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear estimated value and financing condition
Reasonable submission deadline
E-procurement enabled
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based)

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Several documents in unsupported formats for AI analysis

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Integrate explicit sustainability or social impact criteria into the evaluation.
3. Ensure all essential documents are provided in machine-readable formats if possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline