Skip to main content
Tenders

Execution of road marking works 2026-2028

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306709
Value
€3,300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€3,300,000
Duration
29 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Execution of road markings on public roads of the city of Tallinn (hereinafter referred to as the work). A more detailed description of the work is provided in Annex 1 to the base documents (Technical specification and volume of road markings to be installed within the framework of the public procurement "Execution of road marking works") and Annex 5 (draft procurement contract).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Tender is not divided into lots due to excessive cost.
--Bidders must submit a bid guarantee.
--Bidders must comply with terms regarding joint offers, business secrets, and subcontractor engagement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be involved in fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide information on subcontractors used.
--Subcontractors must not be affiliated with the Russian Federation.
--Subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the general description of the service.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306709_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306709_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.9 KB

The tender document "Compliance Conditions" clarifies requirements for joint bids, trade secrets, subcontractor engagement, and bid submission, also requiring a bid guarantee.

Info esitamine alltöövõtjate kohta vastavalt hanke alusdokumentide lisas 3 toodu...DOC
Lisad 3 ja 4.docx -- 20.4 KB

The bidder must submit information about subcontractors used according to the specified form and confirmations that subcontractors are not linked to the Russian Federation and have no grounds for exclusion.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306709_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306709_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 87.6 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road marking services in Tallinn is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The reliance on the national e-procurement portal suggests regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements for subcontractors are documented. The evaluation criterion (lowest bid price) is explicitly stated. Conditions for submission and subcontractor engagement are detailed in the provided documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the absence of explicit technical capability and financial requirements leaves some gaps. The number of attached documents is reasonable.

Missing explicit technical capability requirements.
Missing explicit financial requirements.
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion is objective. The requirement for subcontractors to not be affiliated with the Russian Federation, while potentially justifiable for security reasons, could be perceived as a tailored requirement if not universally applied or clearly justified by specific risks. However, the overall fairness is high due to objective evaluation and full document access.

Subcontractor affiliation requirement with the Russian Federation could be perceived as tailored.
Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed, and the reliance on specific document formats (.xml, .asice) not directly supported by AI analysis can be a minor practical hurdle for some bidders.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Reliance on specific document formats not directly supported by AI analysis.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced. The tender status is clearly indicated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criterion (lowest bid price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined financial information and timeline.
Clear description of the service and subcontractor requirements.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Absence of explicit technical capability and financial requirements.
Potential perception of tailored requirements regarding subcontractor affiliation.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
2. Provide more detailed technical capability and financial requirements to ensure a broader range of qualified bidders.
3. Clearly justify any specific subcontractor affiliation requirements if they are to be maintained.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline