Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of Distribution Substation No. 850 at Gildi Street 11, Tallinn City, Harju County (IK1211)

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306579
Value
€300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 04, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€300,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this tender is the reconstruction of distribution substation No. 850 located at Gildi Street 11, Kesklinn District, Tallinn City, Harju County. The deadline for handover of works is 18.12.2026.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a completed cost table ('Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx').
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must provide details of their qualified electrical works supervisor and responsible person.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must comply with the exclusion grounds described in the document '306579_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimistingimused.pdf'.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions as per '306579_vastavustingimused.pdf'.
--Bidders must possess a qualified electrical works supervisor.
--Bidders must possess a responsible person for electrical works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied by the need for qualified electrical personnel.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a completed cost table ('Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx') detailing costs for project management, specialized work projects, general construction, and primary parts.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306579_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.8 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, submit a cost proposal table, have a qualified electrical works supervisor and responsible person, and designate a contract signatory.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud pakkumuse maksumuse tabeliXLS
Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 22.0 KB

Bidders must submit a completed cost table detailing project management, specialized work projects, general construction, and primary component costs.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306579_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on economic advantage, with the lowest price being the best.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306579_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 9.5 KB

This document outlines the exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for bidders, which are mandatory for participation in the tender procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for substation reconstruction in Tallinn is generally well-structured with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks explicit detail on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects, and relies heavily on external documents for crucial requirements.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with proper CPV codes, a clear procedure, and specified deadlines. The value is disclosed and within limits. The financing conditions are detailed. No disputes are noted. The regulatory compliance appears to be met at a general level, but detailed review of attached documents is necessary for full assurance.

Clarity80/100

The core objective and location are clearly described. Key personnel and financial requirements are outlined. However, the reliance on multiple external PDF and Excel documents for detailed requirements (exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capabilities, financial tables) slightly reduces overall clarity. The 'Muu' type documents being in unsupported formats also hinders clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. The contract duration is implied by the 'Tender Valid' period and completion date. However, several crucial requirement documents are in unsupported formats or not fully summarized, which impacts the completeness of the accessible information for analysis.

Several key documents are in unsupported .zip format, hindering a complete assessment of their content.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for general access to documents and discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criterion is 'relative_weighting' with the lowest price being best, which is objective. E-procurement and electronic submission are standard. Deadlines seem reasonable. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are indicated. A contract start date is provided. Financing conditions are detailed, including payment terms and factoring options. However, the reliance on numerous external documents, some in unsupported formats, impacts the ease of submission and overall practicality. The lack of direct URLs for all referenced documents is a minor drawback.

Some crucial documents are referenced but not directly accessible via URL or are in unsupported formats.
The dependency on multiple external files for core requirements may complicate the submission process.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender status is '11' (likely active). The contract start date logically follows the submission deadline. No suspensions or disputes are noted. The duration type and validity period are specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded'. However, there are no explicit mentions or requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text. This is a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability goals into the procurement process.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear description of the project's objective and location.
Detailed financial information, including payment terms.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Standard e-procurement and e-submission process.

Concerns

Reliance on multiple external documents, some in unsupported formats.
Lack of explicit detail on technical capability requirements within the summary.
Absence of sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Provide direct links or embed key documents within the tender platform.
2. Clarify or summarize technical capability requirements directly in the tender notice.
3. Integrate sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement standards.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline