Skip to main content
Tenders

A013PA - (Extra Care Build) - Rocheway

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
000781-2026
Value
£16,500,000
Location
Essex, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 06, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£16,500,000
Duration
25 months
Location
Essex
Type
Open Procedure
67
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Essex County Council (ECC) wishes to select a Registered Provider to build, own and manage an extra care scheme within Essex on an ECC owned site in Rochford District Council area. The scheme has full planning approval for a 60-apartment extra care scheme The extra care scheme will provide accommodation for people with care and support needs including older people, people with learning disabilities, people with mental health needs and people with physical or sensory disabilities and people with dementia

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (10)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-04-06 11:00:00.
--Propose a solution for building, owning, and managing a 60-apartment extra care scheme.
--Propose a solution that accommodates the specified diverse care and support needs.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided tender notice.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidding entity must be a Registered Provider.
--The bidding entity must be capable of building an extra care scheme.
--The bidding entity must be capable of owning an extra care scheme.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Capability to build a 60-apartment extra care scheme.
--Capability to manage a 60-apartment extra care scheme.
--Capability to provide accommodation for people with care and support needs, including older people.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Capability to undertake a project with an estimated contract value of 16,500,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
000781-2026_official.pdf

This tender notice from Essex County Council invites Registered Providers to build, own, and manage a 60-apartment extra care scheme in Rochford, detailing project scope, estimated value, and submission deadlines.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender notice provides a clear project description and basic requirements, but its critical flaw is the complete absence of any tender documents, rendering it highly incomplete and impractical for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender notice lacks explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a significant legal compliance oversight. The absence of full tender documentation also prevents a comprehensive assessment of compliance with broader procurement regulations regarding transparency and equal treatment.

Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.
Inability to assess full legal compliance due to missing tender documents.
Clarity40/100

The project description and the high-level requirements are clear in outlining the procuring entity's objective. However, the complete lack of detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, and submission instructions within actual tender documents severely undermines overall clarity for bidders.

Lack of detailed specifications and technical requirements.
Absence of clear evaluation criteria and methodology.
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. While basic information is provided, the complete absence of any tender documents (e.g., Invitation to Tender, detailed specifications, draft contract, evaluation criteria, submission forms) makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer.

No tender documents attached or available.
Missing detailed project specifications.
Fairness60/100

The requirement for a 'Registered Provider' is specific but likely justifiable for an extra care scheme. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria and detailed requirements makes it impossible to ensure a fair and transparent evaluation process, as bidders cannot understand the basis of competition or how their proposals will be judged.

Absence of clear evaluation criteria, risking subjective assessment.
Lack of detailed requirements for fair comparison of bids.
Practicality40/100

This tender is highly impractical for bidders. Without any tender documents, it is impossible for potential suppliers to understand the full scope, technical requirements, legal terms, or how their bid will be evaluated. This will inevitably lead to confusion, non-compliant bids, or a significant lack of participation.

Bidders cannot prepare a proper bid without essential tender documents.
High risk of non-compliant or incomplete bids.
Data Consistency100/100

The basic information and extracted requirements provided are internally consistent. However, the absence of any further documentation limits the scope for a comprehensive data consistency check.

Sustainability0/100

The tender notice does not specify any green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. For a project of this scale and social impact, the absence of such considerations represents a missed opportunity to drive broader public value.

Absence of green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria beyond the core service provision.

Strengths

Clear project description and objective.
Estimated contract value is disclosed.
Open procedure promotes competition (in principle).
Specific eligibility (Registered Provider) and technical capabilities are outlined at a high level.

Concerns

Critical: Complete absence of all essential tender documents (specifications, evaluation criteria, contract).
Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria, risking subjective assessment.
Absence of social, environmental, or innovation criteria.
NUTS code missing, impacting precise location clarity.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all essential tender documents, including detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, draft contract, and submission forms.
2. Clearly state or reference all mandatory and discretionary exclusion grounds in the tender documentation.
3. Integrate specific social, environmental, and innovation criteria into the tender requirements and evaluation methodology.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline