Skip to main content
Tenders

Mowing of green areas by AS Emajõe Veevärk 2026-2027

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306542
Value
€80,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 17, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€43,718
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
562 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the procurement is to carry out mowing works under the conditions specified in the tender documents on the green areas managed by AS Emajõe Veevärk for the period 2026-2027. The total area to be mowed is approximately 50 ha.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted by 2026-04-06 08:00:00.
--The tender is divided into five parts (regions), and bidders must bid for at least one.
--Bidders must refer to "I osa Juhised_pakkujatele.pdf" for instructions on submission deadline, tender procedure type, tender parts, and base documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bid for at least one of the five parts (regions).
--Bidders can bid for multiple parts, but must consider their capacity to perform mowing in all offered regions.
--If a bidder submits a bid for multiple regions, they cannot withdraw from any region before the contract is signed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit Form 1 listing the machines and equipment necessary for service provision, confirming their availability or possibility of use.
--Bidders must adhere to the technical conditions specified in document "III osa Tehnilised tingimused.pdf".
--Bidders must be capable of performing mowing in all offered regions.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 80,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306542_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 27.1 KB

This document outlines the tender conditions for AS Emajõe Veevärk's green area mowing, including joint bids, bid submission, cost, sanctions compliance, and bidder participation restrictions.

IV osa. Objektide nimekiriXLS
IV osa Objektide nimekiri.xlsx -- 45.7 KB

The contracting authority AS Emajõe Veevärk is seeking service providers for mowing green areas in the Elva region for 2026-2027, providing a detailed list of objects with areas and classifications.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306542_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 8.2 KB

The contracting authority AS Emajõe Veevärk evaluates offers for lawn mowing based primarily on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306542_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 76.2 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses, intended for review before electronic completion.

III osa. Tehnilised tingimusedPDF
III osa Tehnilised tingimused.pdf -- 210.0 KB

The contracting authority AS Emajõe Veevärk is seeking service providers for lawn mowing in 2026-2027, requiring the submission of Form 1 listing machinery and equipment, and adherence to technical specifications.

II osa. Lepingu tingimusedPDF
II osa Lepingu tingimused.pdf -- 241.9 KB

This document outlines the contract terms for AS Emajõe Veevärk's green area mowing for 2026-2027, defining parties, scope of work, payment conditions, and rights/obligations.

I osa. Juhised pakkujatelePDF
I osa Juhised_pakkujatele.pdf -- 216.9 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders on the AS Emajõe Veevärk green area mowing tender for 2026-2027, clarifying the submission deadline, procurement procedure, tender parts, and base documents.

Vorm 1_Masinate ja seadmete nimekiriDOC
Vorm 1_Masinate ja seadmete nimekiri.docx -- 17.4 KB

The bidder must submit Form 1, listing the machinery and equipment required for service provision, confirming their availability or possibility of use.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for green area mowing is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations. The division into parts is a positive aspect for bidder flexibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could be a legal oversight depending on local regulations.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and requirements are documented in various attached files. The division into five parts is well-explained. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria impacts overall clarity regarding how bids will be assessed beyond cost.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration (implied by the period 2026-2027), and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and submission forms are attached. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated as a single figure, and the financing conditions are only referenced in base documents.

Contract duration not explicitly stated as a single figure
Financing conditions referenced only in base documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, offering full document access and disclosing the estimated value. The division into five parts allows bidders to participate based on their capacity. The criteria for bidding on multiple parts are objective. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, promoting fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates e-submission and provides document URLs. The contract start date is implied by the period 2026-2027. Financing information is referenced but not detailed. The duration is specified as a period rather than a fixed term in months, which could be more precise.

Financing details not explicitly provided
Contract duration could be more precisely stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical, with reveal, submission, and opening dates following a sensible sequence.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is a significant weakness.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear division into five parts for flexibility
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
Contract duration could be more precisely stated

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.
3. Specify the exact contract duration in months or a definitive end date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline