Skip to main content
Tenders

Interior furnishing of RMK Paikuse administrative building

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306440
Value
€210,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Total Bid Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€210,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Interior furnishing of RMK Paikuse administrative building (interior furnishings and inventory, and outdoor area inventory)
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for the supply and installation of interior and exterior inventory for the RMK Paikuse administrative building.
--The value of the tender is 210,000.0 EUR.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-14 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they do not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Joint bidders must provide a power of attorney.
--Bidders may mark trade secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the form proving the technical compliance of products with the tender conditions.
--Submit Technical Compliance Form Part 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306440_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 23.1 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation in contract execution, and provide a joint bidder authorization and declare trade secrets if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306440_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 8.9 KB

The tender evaluation criteria stipulate that the total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306440_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 68.0 KB

The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion itself.

HankedokumentDOC
HD 306440.docx -- 58.7 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the furnishing of the RMK Paikuse administrative building, covering the supply and installation of interior and exterior inventory.

Tehnilise vastavuse vorm osa 1XLS
Tehnilise vastavuse vorm osa 1.xlsx -- 2.5 MB

Submit the form demonstrating technical compliance of products with tender requirements to participate in the RMK Paikuse administrative building furnishing tender.

Tehnilise vastavuse vorm osa 2XLS
Tehnilise vastavuse vorm osa 2.xlsx -- 306.0 KB

This document contains the technical compliance form part 2, which is required for tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the furnishing of the RMK Paikuse administrative building is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and good legal compliance. However, it lacks specific details regarding contract duration and innovation focus.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with clear procedures, a proper CPV code, and no apparent disputes. The financing condition offers flexibility to the contracting authority. Deadlines appear reasonable.

Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the scope of work and specifies evaluation criteria, although the lack of explicit criteria beyond 'lowest price' could be more detailed. Document summaries are helpful.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration for tender validity. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the value. The e-submission and e-procurement nature promote fairness. The exclusion of Russian-connected entities is a geopolitical consideration rather than company-specific tailoring.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. While financing information is present, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and the lack of a specified contract duration impacts long-term planning for bidders.

Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are populated, and the tender is not marked as suspended or in dispute. Dates appear logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, there is no specific focus on social aspects or innovation, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

No specific social criteria mentioned
No specific innovation focus mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of scope
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Proper CPV code and reference number
Exclusion criteria related to geopolitical context
Financing condition flexibility

Concerns

Missing contract duration
No specific innovation focus
Limited detail on evaluation criteria beyond price

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Elaborate on any specific innovation requirements or preferences.
3. Provide more detailed breakdown of evaluation criteria beyond just the lowest price, if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline