Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of vehicle maintenance and repair services

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306394
Value
€352,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€352,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the public procurement is to conclude framework agreements for each part, based on which maintenance and repair services for the hospital's vehicles will be purchased over a 36-month period.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for vehicle maintenance and repair services is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive, cost-optimized pricing while meticulously adhering to all technical and eligibility requirements. Demonstrating reliability and efficiency in service delivery will be crucial to mitigate any perceived risks associated with the lowest bid.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Value: Delivering reliable, high-quality vehicle maintenance and repair services at the most competitive price.

Operational Excellence: Ensuring seamless service delivery and minimal downtime for Pärnu Hospital's critical fleet.

Trusted Partnership: A dependable provider committed to meeting and exceeding the hospital's operational needs.

Key Opportunities
The sole evaluation criterion being total cost presents a significant opportunity for a price-leading bidder.
Joint bids are permitted, allowing for potential cost-sharing and risk mitigation among multiple entities.
The 36-month framework agreement offers a stable, long-term revenue stream for the successful bidder.
Key Challenges
The 100% price weighting means intense competition and pressure to offer the absolute lowest price, potentially impacting profit margins.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Optimize operational efficiency, leverage bulk purchasing for parts, and explore lean methodologies. Clearly articulate the value proposition beyond just price in supporting documentation, even if not directly scored.

Ensuring strict adherence to all technical specifications and deadlines while maintaining a low cost.

Develop robust internal processes and quality control measures. Invest in efficient diagnostic tools and skilled technicians. Proactively manage inventory and supplier relationships to ensure timely access to parts and materials.

Potential for a 'race to the bottom' in pricing, where quality or service levels might be compromised by less scrupulous bidders.

Emphasize the bidder's commitment to quality and reliability in the Hankepass and any supporting documentation. Highlight past performance and customer satisfaction where possible, even if not a scored criterion. Clearly define service level agreements in the bid to set expectations.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established automotive service provider with a strong track record in fleet maintenance, particularly for public sector or healthcare organizations. This bidder should possess efficient operational processes, strong supplier relationships for parts, and a highly skilled technical team capable of delivering consistent, high-quality service at a competitive price point. Experience with framework agreements and electronic submission systems is also beneficial.
Key Requirements
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, including no international sanctions.
Submission of a complete and accurate Hankepass (preliminary proof of qualification and compliance) electronically.
Detailed price offer including vehicle, maintenance, and repair costs, submitted using the provided form.
Ability to provide regular maintenance and emergency repair services according to technical specifications, deadlines, and material usage.
Declaration of acceptance of tender conditions and submission of the bid form.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated efficiency in service delivery that translates directly to lower operational costs for the hospital.
A proven track record of reliability and minimal vehicle downtime for similar clients.
Proactive approach to maintenance that can prevent costly emergency repairs.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the bid's supporting narrative, if feasible, to subtly enhance the bidder's profile.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost100.0%

Aggressively price the bid to be the lowest. Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all possible savings. Ensure the price offer form is completed accurately and comprehensively, leaving no room for ambiguity that could lead to disqualification or higher perceived costs.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Optimize Pricing
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis to determine the lowest possible sustainable price. This includes optimizing parts procurement, labor efficiency, and overhead allocation. The goal is to be the absolute lowest bidder to secure the maximum score.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Hankepass Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately, comprehensively, and electronically. Pay close attention to all eligibility and exclusion grounds, especially the confirmation of no international sanctions. Any errors or omissions here will lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid admissibility and compliance.
Adhere Strictly to Technical Specifications
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' and ensure the bid explicitly demonstrates the capability to meet all deadlines, qualification requirements, and material usage specifications. While not directly scored, failure here can lead to disqualification or contract disputes.

Ensures technical compliance and avoids future issues.
Leverage Joint Bidding Opportunity
HighMed effort

If internal cost optimization is insufficient to be the lowest bidder, explore forming a joint bid with another reputable service provider. This can allow for shared resources, economies of scale, and a more competitive overall price.

Increases competitiveness and potential for winning bid.
Clearly Define Service Delivery in Bid
HighLow effort

Even though price is the sole criterion, subtly highlight the bidder's commitment to reliable service delivery and efficiency within the bid form or any permitted supporting statements. This helps build confidence in the lowest bid's quality.

Mitigates perceived risk of lowest price impacting quality.
Accurate Price Offer Submission
MediumMed effort

Use the provided price offer form precisely. Ensure all data on vehicle costs, maintenance, and repair costs are included and accurately calculated. Double-check the total cost submission.

Ensures compliance with submission requirements and accurate evaluation.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising essential service quality. Emphasize operational efficiency and lean processes that enable the lowest price. Highlight reliability and a proven track record to assure the contracting authority that the lowest bid is also a secure and dependable choice.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must complete and submit the bid form, which includes a declaration of acceptance of tender conditions, power of attorney if applicable, and data on previous contracts.
--Bidders must submit the price offer using the provided form.
--Bidders must mark business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to international sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a Hankepass (preliminary proof of qualification and compliance) electronically.
--Bidders must confirm they are not subject to international sanctions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must ensure regular maintenance and emergency repair services for vehicles, including operational vehicles, according to deadlines, qualification requirements, and material usage specified in the technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a price offer including data on vehicle costs, maintenance, and repair costs.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306394_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.6 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, including joint submissions, marking of trade secrets, submission of bid costs, and absence of international sanctions.

Lisa 2 Pakkumuse vormidDOC
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse vormid.docx -- 48.2 KB

The bidder must complete and submit this form, which includes a declaration of acceptance of tender conditions and, if necessary, a power of attorney and details of previous contracts.

Lisa 3 Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 3 Hinnapakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 20.4 KB

The contracting authority is seeking car maintenance and repair services, and bidders must submit a price offer form including vehicle data and costs for maintenance and repair work.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306394_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.5 KB

The tender evaluation will be based solely on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306394_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.8 KB

The procurement pass is an initial confirmation of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

306394 HankedokumendidDOC
306394 Hankedokument.docx -- 52.9 KB

Pärnu Hospital is procuring car maintenance and repair services through an open tender procedure, reference number 306394.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 89.8 KB

Bidders must provide regular maintenance and emergency repair services for vehicles, including operational vehicles, according to the deadlines, qualification requirements, and material usage specified in the technical description.

Lisa 4 Raamlepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 58.5 KB

This document is a framework agreement draft that defines the terms for concluding service contracts and providing car maintenance and repair services.

Lisa 5 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 5 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 79.2 KB

This document is a draft contract for regular works under the framework agreement for the procurement of car maintenance and repair services by Pärnu Hospital Foundation, outlining the contract terms and validity period.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for car maintenance and repair services is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and specific sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The inclusion of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements aligns with legal frameworks.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the requirements for technical capability and submission are well-documented. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of a specified contract duration in the main tender information is a minor clarity issue.

Missing contract duration in main tender information
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and organization details. Key documents like the technical specification, price offer form, and bid form are available. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the core tender details, impacting completeness.

Contract duration not explicitly stated in core tender details
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price), and access to documents is provided. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a high degree of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of a specified contract start date and detailed financing information slightly reduces its practicality. The duration of the framework agreement (36 months) is mentioned in the description, but not as a distinct field.

Missing contract start date
Limited financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented, and the tender validity period is specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it is not stated as EU funded, the absence of sustainability considerations limits this score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Use of e-procurement and e-submission
Well-defined technical and submission requirements
Mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility criteria

Concerns

Missing contract duration in main tender details
Absence of sustainability criteria
Missing contract start date

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly in the main tender information.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation or requirements.
3. Include the contract start date for better planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline