Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and Construction of Landscape Architectural Solution for Islandi väljak

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306272
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Economically most advantageous tender100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the public procurement is to conclude a procurement contract for the design and construction of a temporary landscape architectural solution for Islandi väljak.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on a single evaluation criterion: price. The winning strategy will involve submitting the lowest competitive bid while ensuring all mandatory and eligibility requirements are met meticulously. Efficiency in design and construction delivery is paramount.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and efficient solution for the Islandi väljak landscape project.

Guaranteed compliance and timely delivery of a high-quality landscape design and construction.

Key Opportunities
Leverage simplified procurement procedure for streamlined bid preparation.
Focus on cost optimization in design and construction methods to achieve the lowest bid price.
Utilize 'or equivalent' clause for material and component selection to manage costs.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify areas for efficiency gains in design and construction, and benchmark against similar projects to establish a competitive yet profitable price point. Consider lean construction methodologies.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all mandatory requirements and documentation formats.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents, paying close attention to the 'Hankepass' and CV forms. Assign a dedicated compliance officer to verify adherence to all tender conditions.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with proven experience in landscape architecture design and construction, particularly in urban public spaces. They should have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing and a highly efficient project manager capable of delivering within budget and schedule.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of compliance with all tender document conditions.
Submission of a qualified design project manager's CV (Annex 3).
Detailed work schedule.
Use of 'Hankepass' (ESPD) for preliminary evidence.
Bid price as the sole evaluation criterion.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects of similar scope and complexity within tight budget constraints.
A highly experienced and proactive project manager with a track record of efficient project execution.
A clear and concise work schedule that instills confidence in timely delivery.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider incorporating a commitment to using local suppliers for materials where cost-effective, contributing to the local economy.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid Price100%

Submit the absolute lowest viable price that ensures profitability. This requires meticulous cost estimation and identification of all possible cost-saving measures without compromising quality or compliance.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Compliance Check
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review and ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are met. Pay special attention to the 'Hankepass' (ESPD) and the Project Manager's CV form (Annex 3), ensuring they are completed precisely as per the tender documents.

Prevents disqualification.
Aggressive Price Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a detailed cost breakdown and identify all potential cost efficiencies in both design and construction phases. Aim to submit the lowest possible price that is still profitable, leveraging the 'or equivalent' clause for materials where appropriate.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Detailed and Realistic Work Schedule
HighMed effort

Create a comprehensive work schedule that clearly outlines all design and construction phases, milestones, and timelines. Ensure it is realistic and achievable, demonstrating efficient project management capabilities.

Builds confidence in delivery and meets technical requirements.
Highlight Project Manager Expertise
MediumLow effort

Ensure the Project Manager's CV (Annex 3) clearly showcases relevant experience in similar urban landscape projects, emphasizing efficiency, budget adherence, and successful completion. Quantify achievements where possible.

Strengthens the perceived capability of the bid.
Understand 'Lihthankemenetluse kord'
MediumLow effort

Thoroughly understand the simplified procurement procedure outlined in 'Lihthankemenetluse kord.doc' to ensure the bid submission adheres to all procedural requirements and deadlines.

Ensures smooth submission and avoids procedural errors.
Subcontractor Management (if applicable)
HighMed effort

If subcontractors are used, meticulously complete Annex 2, clearly defining their roles, responsibilities, and how their use contributes to cost-efficiency and timely delivery. Ensure subcontractors are reliable and compliant.

Avoids issues related to subcontractor performance and compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective and efficient solution for the Islandi väljak project, emphasizing a lean operational model and streamlined delivery process. Highlight the value proposition of achieving the desired landscape outcome at the lowest possible price.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must confirm that their offer complies with all tender document conditions.
--The tender procedure follows the simplified procurement procedure as described in the document 'Lihthankemenetluse kord.doc'.
--The bid must be submitted according to the requirements of the simplified procurement procedure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that their offer complies with all tender document conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit the required economic operator notification.
--Bidders must include a qualified design project manager.
--Bidders must submit the project manager's CV form according to the requirements in Annex 3.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is for the design and construction of the landscape architectural solution for Islandi väljak.
--The solution must comply with current legislation.
--A detailed work schedule must be submitted.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306272_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 14.0 KB

Bidders must confirm their offer meets all tender document conditions, submit the required economic activity notification, and include a qualified design project manager.

Lisa 2 - Alltöövõtu kasutamise vormDOC
Lisa 2 - Alltöövõtu kasutamise vorm.doc -- 69.5 KB

This document is a form to be completed if subcontractors are used in the tender, detailing their utilization.

Lisa 3 - Projektijuhi CV vormDOC
Lisa 3 - Projektijuhi CV vorm.doc -- 71.5 KB

Submit the Project Manager's CV form according to the requirements in Annex 3 to prove qualifications.

Lisa 3 - Projektijuhi CV vormDOC
Lisa 3 - Projektijuhi CV vorm.doc -- 71.5 KB

A project manager CV form must be submitted as part of the qualification requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306272_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306272_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 43.1 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Lihthankemenetluse kordDOC
Lihthankemenetluse kord.doc -- 111.0 KB

This document outlines the procedure for simplified procurement, which is necessary for submitting a bid.

Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 296.8 KB

The contracting authority seeks a bidder to design and construct the landscape architectural solution for Islandi väljak, adhering to applicable legislation and submitting a detailed work schedule.

Lisa 4 - Projekteerimise ja ehituse töövõtulepingu kavandDOC
Lisa 4 - Projekteerimise ja ehituse töövõtule... -- 52.5 KB

This document is a draft design and construction contract, outlining the terms, parties, and related documents for the design and construction of the landscape architecture solution for Islandi väljak.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for landscape architecture design and construction is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed financial information.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement laws, referencing the Estonian Public Procurement Act and Tallinn's procurement regulations. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is defined. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear. Requirements for project manager qualifications and subcontractor use are specified. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards enhances clarity. The evaluation criterion is explicitly stated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the financing condition is general, and while a draft contract is attached, specific details on payment schedules or performance bonds are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The evaluation criterion (lowest bid price) is objective. Requirements for project manager qualifications and subcontractor forms are standard. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A contract start date is provided. The financing condition is mentioned but lacks specific details on the source beyond general budget allocations. The duration is specified as '2 months' for tender validity, which is reasonable.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender is active and not suspended. Dates are logically sequenced. The estimated value and financing condition are consistent with the tender's scope.

Sustainability50/100

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The financing is from local government and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which does not inherently imply EU funding for this specific project.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social responsibility considerations

Strengths

Clear objective and scope
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Reasonable deadlines and contract start date

Concerns

Limited detail on financing specifics
Absence of sustainability criteria
Tender validity duration could be more explicitly linked to project phases

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or social responsibility criteria.
2. Provide more granular details on financing sources and payment terms.
3. Clarify the relationship between tender validity and project execution timeline.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline