Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and construction works for the access road section Liiva street – Supelrand R2 in Narva-Jõesuu city

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306228
Value
€112,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€112,000
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The scope of the procurement includes the design and construction of the road section from Liiva street to the beginning of the access road built within the framework of the pier construction project on the Supelrand R2 property. Small forms (waste bins, benches, stands) will be installed on the access road according to the site plan solution, and the lighting of the access road will be designed and built. The scope of the procurement includes the preparation of the road construction work project/working drawings, and the preparation of the street lighting work project/working drawings based on the main projects provided by the Contracting Authority.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on a straightforward design and build project for an access road. The primary evaluation criterion is cost, making a highly competitive price essential. Bidders must meticulously adhere to all mandatory and eligibility requirements, particularly concerning subcontractor confirmations and the correct submission of all required forms.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective and Compliant Solution for Narva-Jõesuu Access Road

Reliable Design and Construction with Guaranteed Quality

Key Opportunities
Dominant role of cost in evaluation.
Opportunity to leverage existing relationships or local knowledge for efficient execution.
Clear technical requirements allow for focused design and build planning.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify areas for efficiency and optimization without compromising quality. Explore material sourcing and construction methods that offer cost savings. Consider a lean project management approach.

Strict adherence to all mandatory forms and eligibility criteria.

Implement a rigorous document review process, assigning dedicated personnel to ensure all forms are correctly completed, signed, and submitted. Double-check all references to required documents (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Vorm 3, Vorm 4).

Potential for disqualification due to minor errors in submission.

Utilize a checklist based on the tender documents and submission requirements. Conduct internal pre-submission reviews by experienced procurement professionals.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering and construction firm with a proven track record in road construction and public procurement in Estonia. The ideal bidder will have robust cost control mechanisms, efficient project management capabilities, and a strong understanding of Estonian procurement regulations. Familiarity with Narva-Jõesuu's local context is a plus.
Key Requirements
Detailed cost table (Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx)
Power of attorney (Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx) or joint bidder power of attorney (Vorm 2 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx)
Consent document from third-party resources if used (Vorm 3 Teise isiku nõusolek.docx)
Subcontractor confirmations (Vorm 4 Alltöövõtja kinnitused.docx) and background check compliance
Compliance with technical specifications (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx)
Confirmation of compliance with conditions (306228_vastavustingimused.pdf)
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lowest compliant bid.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that instills confidence in the bidder's understanding of the project's financial scope.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential risks within the technical specification, presented clearly in the bid.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management during construction. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors ignore it.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of the bid100%

Develop a highly competitive and detailed cost proposal. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accurately captured in Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx. Identify opportunities for cost efficiencies in design and construction methods.

Technical Capability

Demonstrate a clear understanding of the technical requirements outlined in Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx. Ensure the proposed design and construction methods align with the quality standards and principles of equivalence specified.

Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds

Meticulously complete all required forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Vorm 3, Vorm 4) and provide necessary confirmations. Ensure all subcontractors meet the exclusion criteria and provide their confirmations.

Recommendations6
Master the Cost Table
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant effort to accurately populate Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx. Break down costs granularly for design and construction, including general and specific works. Ensure no line items are missed and that the pricing reflects competitive market rates while ensuring profitability.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, crucial for winning.
Flawless Form Submission
CriticalMed effort

Create a checklist for all mandatory forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Vorm 3, Vorm 4) and supporting documents. Assign a dedicated person to review and verify each submission before the deadline. Pay close attention to signatures, dates, and correct authorization.

Prevents immediate disqualification due to administrative errors.
Cost Optimization Strategy
CriticalMed effort

Beyond just low pricing, demonstrate value. This could involve proposing efficient construction methods or material choices that reduce long-term maintenance, even if not explicitly asked for. Highlight how your cost structure ensures quality.

Enhances perceived value and competitiveness.
Proactive Risk Identification
MediumLow effort

While not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly highlight any potential risks identified in the technical specification (e.g., ground conditions, access) and how your design/construction plan mitigates them. This shows foresight and competence.

Builds confidence in the bidder's project management capabilities.
Subcontractor Due Diligence
HighMed effort

Thoroughly vet all proposed subcontractors. Ensure they can provide the required confirmations (Vorm 4) and pass the contracting authority's background checks for fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Have backup subcontractors identified.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Optional Sustainability Statement
LowLow effort

Include a brief, optional statement in the bid about commitment to sustainable construction practices (e.g., waste reduction, local material sourcing) if it can be achieved without increasing costs. This can be a subtle positive differentiator.

Minor positive impression, potential differentiator if competitors are purely cost-focused.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective yet fully compliant bidder. Emphasize efficiency and adherence to all requirements to counter any perception of 'too cheap to be true'.
Highlight a streamlined project delivery process that ensures timely completion within the 5-month duration.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm compliance with the conditions and submit the bid cost in the prescribed form (306228_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The tender is not divided into lots because the construction works are technically interconnected to such an extent that dividing them into lots would be unreasonable both technically and organizationally and might not ensure the same quality result.
--The tender documents required for submitting a bid are contained in Hanke alusdokument - juurdepääsutee.docx.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority shall exclude a candidate if it has established that the candidate has been convicted of fraud, corruption, money laundering or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney (Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx) authorizing a natural person to represent the bidder in the public procurement procedure and in the conclusion of the contract.
--If using third-party resources for qualification, a consent document from the third party is required (Vorm 3 Teise isiku nõusolek.docx), confirming joint responsibility for contract fulfillment.
--For joint bidders, a power of attorney (Vorm 2 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx) must be submitted, authorizing one bidder to represent the others.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the design and construction works of the access road to Liiva tn – Supelrand R2 in Narva-Jõesuu. The scope includes technical requirements, quality of materials and works, and principles of equivalence as defined in Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors regarding fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence (306228_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The sole evaluation method is the cost of the bid, with a 100% weighting (306228_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf).
--Bidders must submit a detailed cost table describing the costs of design and construction works, including general and specific construction works (Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306228_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306228_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.2 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to define business secrets, submit a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable), confirm compliance with conditions, and present the bid price in the prescribed format.

Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel_Lisa 2XLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 15.1 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost table outlining the expenses for design and construction works, including general and specific construction activities.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306228_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the bid price is the sole evaluation method with a 100% weighting.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306228_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.9 KB

The procurement pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the contracting authority's qualification requirements, and is not intended for completion.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument - juurdepääsutee.docx -- 3.4 MB

This document contains the tender base documents for the design and construction works of the Liiva street – Supelrand R2 access road section in Narva-Jõesuu, which are necessary for submitting a bid.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx -- 202.4 KB

This technical specification defines the technical requirements, material and work quality, and equivalence principles for the design and construction works of the Narva-Jõesuu town Liiva street – Supelrand R2 access road.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Lepingu eelnõu.docx -- 3.0 MB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms and obligations for the design and construction works of the Liiva street – Supelrand R2 access road in Narva-Jõesuu.

Vorm 1. VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx -- 3.1 MB

This power of attorney authorizes a physical person to represent the bidder in the public procurement procedure and contract signing.

Vorm 2. Ühispakkujate volikriDOC
Vorm 2 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 3.6 MB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to represent other participants in a joint bid.

Vorm 3. Teise isiku nõusolekDOC
Vorm 3 Teise isiku nõusolek.docx -- 3.1 MB

This document is a third-party consent form confirming that the bidder can utilize resources from another entity to prove their qualifications and that they will be jointly responsible for contract fulfillment.

Vorm 4. Alltöövõtja kinnitused.DOC
Vorm 4 Alltöövõtja kinnitused.docx -- 9.4 KB

The subcontractor's confirmation that there are no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure is required to be submitted with the bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for design and construction works of an access road is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear process. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached forms and specifications. Evaluation criteria are specified, and conditions for submission are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while many documents are attached, the overall completeness could be improved by explicitly stating the contract start date.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (price-based), and e-procurement is utilized. Deadlines are reasonable. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. While document URLs are not explicitly listed for all, the primary tender documents are accessible. The contract duration is specified, but the contract start date is missing, impacting full practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date missing.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is EU funded, which is a positive characteristic, but specific sustainability goals are absent.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of works and requirements.
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
EU funded.

Concerns

Missing contract start date.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Limited detail on financing.

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract start date.
2. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
3. Provide more detailed financing information if possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline