Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and construction works for Kose-Uuemõisa school's nearly zero-energy school building

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306145
Value
€3,660,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 16, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€3,660,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to find a contractor for the general construction of the Kose-Uuemõisa school's nearly zero-energy school building. This includes preparing a demolition project for the existing extension of the Kose-Uuemõisa manor and carrying out the corresponding demolition. The project is co-financed by the European Union from measure Kliima2.9.1 "Energy efficiency of public sector buildings" with the project "Construction of Kosejõe school's nearly zero-energy school building" Kliima2.9.01.25-0143.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a near-zero energy school building in Kose-Uuemõisa prioritizes price above all else (100% weight). Winning requires a highly cost-efficient approach, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and robust subcontractor management. Leveraging experience in similar projects and demonstrating a clear understanding of near-zero energy principles will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Leadership in Near-Zero Energy School Construction

Technical Excellence and Energy Efficiency Expertise

Reliable and Efficient Project Delivery

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price (100% weight) allows for a clear strategy to win by offering the lowest competitive bid.
The tender explicitly requires near-zero energy building design and construction, providing an opportunity to showcase specialized expertise in this area.
The inclusion of demolition works for the existing manor extension presents an opportunity for integrated project planning and cost optimization.
EU co-financing (Kliima2.9.1) suggests a focus on sustainability and energy efficiency, aligning with modern construction practices.
Key Challenges
The 100% price weighting means that any perceived overpricing will severely penalize the bid, requiring extremely accurate costings.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, explore efficient construction methods, and ensure all preliminary project requirements are met with minimal scope creep. Engage subcontractors early to secure competitive rates.

The complexity of near-zero energy building design and construction, coupled with the need to integrate with existing structures (demolition), requires significant technical expertise.

Assemble a highly skilled design and construction team with proven experience in near-zero energy buildings. Conduct detailed site investigations and risk assessments for the demolition and integration phases.

The requirement for background checks on subcontractors necessitates a proactive approach to vetting and ensuring compliance.

Establish a rigorous subcontractor pre-qualification process that includes checks for criminal offenses and fraud. Maintain clear documentation of subcontractor reliability and compliance.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced general contractor with a proven track record in designing and constructing public buildings, specifically schools, with a strong emphasis on energy efficiency and near-zero energy standards. The ideal bidder will have a well-established supply chain, efficient project management capabilities, and a demonstrated ability to deliver projects within budget and to high technical standards. Experience with EU-funded projects is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Design and construction of a near-zero energy school building.
Adherence to the technical specification and preliminary project (eelprojekt.zip, DWG files).
Implementation of building automation, heating, ventilation, cooling, and lighting systems for energy efficiency.
Submission of a comprehensive cost breakdown and tender form.
Robust subcontractor management, including background checks.
Completion and submission of ESPD in .xml format and tender pass.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated cost-efficiency in delivering near-zero energy buildings.
Innovative or highly efficient construction methodologies that reduce project duration or cost.
Exceptional technical expertise in building automation and energy management systems.
Strong local presence or understanding of the Kose-Uuemõisa context.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labor for a significant portion of the construction workforce, prioritizing individuals from the Kose municipality or surrounding areas. This aligns with the spirit of community development often associated with public infrastructure projects, even if not explicitly mandated.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid price100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible competitive price by optimizing all cost components, including materials, labor, and subcontractor fees. Conduct detailed cost engineering and value engineering exercises. Ensure the cost breakdown is transparent and justifiable.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for the 100% Weighting
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on bid price, the primary focus must be on delivering the most competitive price possible. This requires meticulous cost estimation, efficient supply chain management, and optimized construction methodologies. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising essential quality or safety.

Directly impacts the highest scoring criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Demonstrate Deep Expertise in Near-Zero Energy Buildings
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly address all technical requirements related to near-zero energy design and construction. Showcase specific experience, case studies, and technical solutions that highlight your capability in implementing efficient building automation, HVAC, and lighting systems. Reference the preliminary project and DWG files to demonstrate a clear understanding of the scope.

Ensures compliance with a core technical requirement and builds confidence in the bidder's capabilities.
Proactive Subcontractor Vetting and Management
HighMed effort

Develop a robust process for vetting subcontractors, ensuring they meet the contracting authority's requirements regarding criminal offenses and fraud. Maintain clear documentation of their reliability and obtain all necessary powers of attorney for joint bidders. This proactive approach mitigates risk and demonstrates due diligence.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues and strengthens the overall bid's credibility.
Highlight Integrated Design and Construction Efficiency
MediumMed effort

Emphasize the benefits of a single contractor handling both design and construction. Showcase how this integrated approach leads to greater efficiency, cost savings, and better coordination, especially concerning the demolition and new build phases.

Positions the bidder as a more efficient and cost-effective solution.
Commit to Local Employment and Community Engagement
LowLow effort

While not explicitly required, a commitment to employing local labor and engaging with the Kose community can be a subtle differentiator and align with the public nature of the project. Frame this as a benefit to the local economy and a demonstration of corporate responsibility.

Adds a positive qualitative aspect to the bid, potentially influencing subjective evaluation if any minor weight is given beyond price.
Thorough Review of Preliminary Project and DWG Files
HighHigh effort

Dedicate significant time to meticulously review the provided 'eelprojekt.zip' and '20250717_DWG.zip' files. Identify any potential ambiguities, conflicts, or areas that might lead to cost overruns or delays during the design and construction phases. Address these proactively in the bid submission.

Reduces the risk of scope creep, disputes, and unexpected costs, contributing to a more accurate and competitive bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution for a high-quality, near-zero energy school building. Emphasize the bidder's ability to deliver on time and within budget, leveraging efficient project management and construction techniques. Highlight experience with similar public sector projects and EU-funded initiatives to build trust and credibility.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

35 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (15)
Technical (5)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-13 06:00:00.
--The tender requires the submission of a tender pass.
--The tender requires the submission of an ESPD in .xml format.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority does not divide the procurement into lots as the work is intrinsically a whole and it is technically difficult to divide the work, and division would create contractual confusion regarding responsibility.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS15
--The tender is for the design and construction of a near-zero energy school building.
--The tender is for Kose-Uuemõisa school.
--The contracting authority is Kose Vallavalitsus.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender requires the design and construction of a near-zero energy school building.
--The tender requires adherence to the technical specification.
--The tender requires the implementation of building automation, heating, ventilation, cooling, and lighting systems for energy efficiency.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender value is 3,660,000.0 EUR.
--The tender will be evaluated based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The tender requires a cost breakdown.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306145_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal offenses and fraud, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306145_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.9 KB

This document outlines conditions for joint bidder powers of attorney, declaration of trade secrets, subcontractor engagement, and bid submission, which are necessary for participation in the tender for the design and construction of the Kose-Uuemõisa school near-zero energy building.

Lisa 2 – Kululoend ja pakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 2 – kululoend ja pakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 44.4 KB

This document is a cost breakdown and offer form that must be completed for the design and construction works tender submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306145_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, considering quality, scope, deadlines, and other conditions.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306145_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.9 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.

Lisa 1 - hankedokument ning tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - hankedokument ning tehniline kirjeld... -- 56.5 KB

The tender document and technical specification define the objective, requirements, changes to the existing project, and site visit times for the design and construction works of the Kose-Uuemõisa school near-zero energy building.

Lisa 3 - hankelepingu vormDOC
Lisa 3 - hankelepingu vorm.docx -- 50.6 KB

This document is a draft contract form outlining the terms and conditions for the design and construction works of the Kose-Uuemõisa school's nearly zero-energy school building.

Lisa 4 - hooneautomaatika lähteülesanneDOC
Lisa 4 - hooneautomaatika lähteülesanne.docx -- 39.0 KB

This Annex 4 outlines the terms of reference for the building automation, heating, ventilation, cooling, and lighting systems of the Kose-Uuemõisa school's nearly zero-energy building, essential for ensuring the smooth operation of technical systems and energy efficiency.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of a near-zero energy school building is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and financial transparency. However, it could benefit from more explicit inclusion of sustainability and innovation criteria, and some technical documents are not readily analyzable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. CPV code is provided. No immediate disputes are indicated. The mention of EU funding and specific grant numbers suggests regulatory adherence.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works and the objective are clear. Key requirements are documented, although some technical specifications are in non-analyzable formats. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' without full detail in the provided text.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration type, and contract start date. While key documents like the technical specification, contract form, and cost breakdown are listed, their accessibility in machine-readable formats for some technical files (e.g., .zip) is a limitation. The statement that the tender is not divided into lots due to its holistic nature is informative.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are stated as relative weighting, implying objective assessment. No specific company tailoring is apparent. Full document access is generally provided, though some technical formats pose accessibility challenges.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are used, which is practical. The contract start date is specified. Financing information, including EU co-funding, is provided. The duration type is 'PERIOD', but the specific duration is not explicitly stated in the provided text, only the tender validity period.

Specific contract duration not explicitly stated in the provided text.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. No suspension or disputes are noted. Dates seem logically sequenced, with Reveal Date preceding Submission and Opening Dates. Tender Valid period is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The core objective is a 'near-zero energy school building,' which aligns with green procurement. However, explicit criteria for broader green procurement, social aspects, or innovation are not detailed in the provided text, and it is stated as not being EU-funded in the 'Issues' section, which contradicts the 'Financing Condition' that states EU co-funding.

Contradiction regarding EU funding status (stated as 'Not EU funded' in Issues vs. explicit EU co-funding in Financing Condition).

Strengths

Clear objective and scope (near-zero energy school building).
Disclosure of estimated value and EU co-financing.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Provision of essential documents like technical specifications and contract forms.

Concerns

Lack of explicit detail on broader sustainability, social, and innovation criteria beyond the core energy efficiency.
Some technical documents are in non-analyzable formats (.zip).
Contradiction in EU funding status between 'Issues' and 'Financing Condition'.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the specific duration of the contract period.
2. Ensure consistency in reporting funding sources.
3. Consider making all technical documentation available in more universally analyzable formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline