Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Further development of the joint database of the Estonian Song and Dance Celebration Foundation and the Estonian Folk Culture Centre (KUM)

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306138
Value
€800,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Project plan for app implementation30%
Development process management methodology and cooperation organization30%
Hourly rate for development work20%
Monthly fee for maintenance and administration work20%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€800,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€187,707
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
1,029 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Further development of the joint database of the Estonian Song and Dance Celebration Foundation and the Estonian Folk Culture Centre (KUM), including the development of an application necessary for organizing the song festival.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires a deep understanding of the Ministry of Culture's technological and non-functional requirements, coupled with a robust project plan and efficient development methodology. Winning hinges on demonstrating technical expertise, cost-effectiveness in pricing, and a clear, well-articulated approach to project management and cooperation.

Key Winning Messages

Proven expertise in Ministry of Culture's technology stack and non-functional requirements, ensuring seamless integration and compliance.

A meticulously planned and efficiently managed development process, guaranteeing timely delivery of a high-quality, user-friendly application.

Cost-effective long-term partnership through competitive maintenance and development rates.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging existing familiarity with the Ministry of Culture's technical and non-functional requirements to build a highly compliant and integrated solution.
Demonstrating a superior project plan and development methodology to secure the highest scores in the most heavily weighted evaluation criteria.
Offering a compelling combination of technical excellence and competitive pricing to win the overall bid.
Key Challenges
High competition due to the tender's public sector nature and the requirement for specific technical expertise.

Focus on clearly articulating unique selling propositions related to experience with similar public sector projects and demonstrating a deep understanding of the Ministry's specific technical environment.

The need to submit a trial work that precisely meets unspecified base document requirements, posing a risk if interpretation is incorrect.

Thoroughly review all provided tender documents, including 'Requirements for trial work', and if possible, seek clarification from the contracting authority to ensure full alignment with expectations.

Balancing competitive pricing with the need to demonstrate high-quality technical delivery and experienced personnel.

Develop a cost model that reflects efficient resource allocation and leverages proven methodologies to deliver value, rather than simply offering the lowest price. Highlight the long-term cost savings of a well-built and maintained system.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A software development company with proven experience in developing and maintaining information systems for public sector clients, particularly within cultural heritage or government administration. The ideal bidder possesses a strong team of experienced architects and developers proficient in the Ministry of Culture's preferred technologies, a well-defined agile development methodology, and a track record of delivering projects on time and within budget. They should also be adept at managing long-term maintenance and administration contracts.
Key Requirements
Adherence to the Ministry of Culture's technological profile and non-functional requirements.
Submission of a detailed project plan for app development, including timeline, functionalities, and technical enhancements.
Demonstration of development process management methodology and cooperation organization.
CVs of team members proving relevant work experience with specified technologies and similar projects.
Submission of a trial work that meets the requirements specified in the tender's base document.
Competitive monthly fee for maintenance and administration work.
Competitive hourly rate for development work.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in developing and maintaining applications for Estonian public sector entities, specifically those related to cultural heritage or large-scale event management.
A highly detailed and innovative project plan that goes beyond basic requirements, showcasing foresight and proactive problem-solving.
A clear and compelling articulation of the development process management methodology, emphasizing collaboration, transparency, and agile adaptability.
A team of highly qualified and experienced individuals whose CVs directly map to the required technologies and project scope.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to using local talent for development and maintenance where feasible, contributing to the Estonian digital economy.
Bid Focus Areas
Project plan for app implementation30.0%

Develop a comprehensive, detailed, and realistic project plan that clearly outlines phases, milestones, deliverables, and risk mitigation strategies. Emphasize agile methodologies, iterative development, and user feedback loops. Showcase a deep understanding of the app's functionalities and technical enhancements required for the choir and dance festival.

Development process management methodology and cooperation organization30.0%

Present a robust, transparent, and collaborative development methodology. Detail communication protocols, reporting structures, issue resolution processes, and how the team will integrate with the contracting authority. Highlight experience with similar cooperation models in public sector projects.

Monthly fee for maintenance and administration work20.0%

Conduct thorough cost analysis to determine a competitive yet sustainable monthly fee. Benchmark against similar long-term maintenance contracts. Clearly define the scope of services included in the fee to justify the proposed amount.

Hourly rate for development work20.0%

Research market rates for developers with the required skill sets in Estonia. Aim for a rate that is competitive but also reflects the expertise and experience of the proposed team. Consider tiered rates for different seniority levels if applicable.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze Ministry of Culture's Technical and Non-Functional Requirements
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant effort to understanding and documenting the 'KUM haldusala tehnoloogiline profiil' and 'KUM haldusala mittefunktsionaalsed nõuded'. Ensure all proposed solutions, technologies, and development practices strictly align with these documents. This is a foundational requirement for eligibility and technical evaluation.

Ensures compliance, avoids disqualification, and forms the basis for a technically sound proposal.
Craft an Exemplary Project Plan and Development Methodology
CriticalHigh effort

Given their high weighting, the project plan and development methodology sections must be outstanding. Go beyond generic descriptions. Detail specific phases, agile sprints, quality assurance processes, risk management, and how cooperation with the contracting authority will be organized. Use visual aids if appropriate. Reference the 'Requirements for trial work' document extensively.

Maximizes scores in the most critical evaluation criteria, significantly increasing the overall bid score.
Showcase Proven Public Sector Experience and Team Expertise
HighMed effort

Highlight previous successful projects with Estonian public sector entities, especially those involving data management, application development, and long-term maintenance. Ensure CVs of key personnel (architects, lead developers) clearly demonstrate experience with the specified technologies and similar project complexities.

Builds trust and credibility, demonstrating the bidder's capability to meet the specific demands of a government tender.
Prepare a High-Quality Trial Work
CriticalHigh effort

The trial work is a mandatory requirement and a key indicator of technical capability. Meticulously follow all instructions in the 'Requirements for trial work' document. Ensure the trial work is functional, well-documented, and demonstrably meets the specified requirements, showcasing the bidder's development skills and adherence to standards.

Fulfills a mandatory requirement and provides concrete evidence of technical competence.
Develop a Competitive and Justified Pricing Strategy
HighMed effort

While price is important (40% combined weight), it must be balanced with the perceived value and quality. Conduct thorough costings for both maintenance/administration and development. Be prepared to justify the rates based on the expertise of the team and the proposed development methodology. Avoid being the cheapest if it compromises perceived quality.

Secures a strong score in the financial evaluation without sacrificing technical credibility.
Clarify Ambiguities in Tender Documents
MediumLow effort

If any aspects of the 'base document' or 'Lisateave.docx' are unclear, especially regarding the trial work or specific technical requirements, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the official procurement channels. This demonstrates diligence and avoids misinterpretations.

Reduces the risk of non-compliance or misinterpretation, leading to a stronger, more accurate bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a trusted, experienced partner for the Estonian public sector, emphasizing a deep understanding of their specific technical and operational needs.
Highlight a proactive, collaborative, and transparent approach to project management, assuring the contracting authority of seamless communication and efficient delivery.
Demonstrate a commitment to long-term partnership through competitive pricing and a clear vision for the ongoing maintenance and evolution of the data repository and application.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bidders must submit CVs of team members and prove their work experience.
--Bidders must submit a trial work that meets the requirements specified in the tender's base document.
--The tender is not divided into parts.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit CVs of team members and prove their work experience.
--Bidders must submit a trial work that meets the requirements specified in the tender's base document.
--Bidders must adhere to the technological profile of the Ministry of Culture's administrative area, including preferred technologies, programming languages, and components.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide CVs of team members, particularly architects and developers, proving their work experience with specified technologies and similar projects.
--Bidders must submit a detailed project plan for the app development, including a timeline, functionalities, technical enhancements, and a description of the development process management methodology and cooperation organization.
--The solution must maintain the existing architecture, performance, and security requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 800,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders will be evaluated based on the monthly fee for maintenance and administration work and the hourly rate for development work.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306138_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must submit CVs of team members, proving their work experience, and provide a trial work that meets the requirements outlined in the tender's base document.

Meeskonna liikmete CV-dDOC
Meeskonna liikmete CV-d.docx -- 34.3 KB

Bidders must submit team member CVs demonstrating their work experience with specified technologies and similar projects, particularly for architects and developers.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306138_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.2 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on monthly maintenance and administration costs, hourly development rates, project plan, and development process management methodology and cooperation.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306138_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.2 KB

The procurement pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and requirements, and is not intended for completion.

HindamismetoodikaDOC
Hindamismetoodika.docx -- 43.0 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology and criteria, including the scoring system and the role of the evaluation committee, to ensure a fair selection process.

KUM haldusala mittefunktsionaalsed nõudedPDF
KUM haldusala mittefunktsionaalsed nouded_.pd... -- 986.2 KB

This document outlines the non-functional requirements for information systems and their developments within the Ministry of Culture's administrative area, including compliance with standards, legislation, and security.

KUM haldusala tehnoloogiline profiilPDF
KUM haldusala tehnoloogiline profiil_2025-1.p... -- 714.4 KB

This document outlines the technological profile of the Ministry of Culture's administrative area, including preferred technologies, programming languages, and components to be followed during solution development.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.docx -- 35.0 KB

This document clarifies the tender procedure, including the decision not to divide the contract into lots, rules for joint submissions, participation of foreign companies, and bid confidentiality and submission requirements.

Nõuded proovitööleDOC
Nõuded proovitööle.docx -- 32.3 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed project plan for app development, including a timeline, functionalities, technical enhancements, and a description of the development process management methodology and cooperation arrangements.

Raam- ja hankelepingu projektDOC
Raam- ja hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 63.5 KB

This framework agreement draft defines the terms, scope, and legal framework for the continued development of the joint database of the Estonian Song and Dance Festival Foundation and the Estonian Folk Culture Centre.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus_jätkuarendused.docx -- 49.5 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider for the further development of the joint database of the Estonian Song and Dance Festival Foundation and the Estonian Folk Culture Centre, emphasizing the preservation of existing architecture, performance, and security requirements, as well as user interface consistency.

Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa 1DOC
Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa 1_äpp.docx -- 40.8 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications for the song and dance festival performers' mobile application and data repository interface, essential for the successful execution of the tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the further development of a joint database for Estonian cultural institutions is well-structured with clear technical and eligibility requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external documents for full understanding.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard. The reference number and organization are clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview. However, the reliance on multiple external documents ('Lisateave', 'KUM haldusala tehnoloogiline profiil', etc.) for full understanding of technical and submission requirements slightly reduces overall clarity for a quick assessment.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Location Info' is vague ('Täpne piirkond määramata'), and the full scope of requirements is spread across numerous attached documents, some of which are not directly summarized.

Vague location information.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to foreign companies and allows joint bids, promoting fairness. The evaluation criteria are based on relative weighting, which is objective. The use of e-procurement and e-submission enhances accessibility. The requirement for a trial work and specific CVs, while detailed, are standard for technical tenders and not overly tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The contract start date is specified. However, the 'Location Info' is not precise, and while financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit financing details are not provided in the summary. The reliance on external documents for full understanding can impact practical application.

Lack of precise location information.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. No suspension or disputes are indicated. The tender status '11' is standard for an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided summary, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear technical and eligibility requirements.
Well-defined evaluation criteria.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Open to joint bids and foreign companies.

Concerns

Reliance on numerous external documents for full understanding.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Vague location information.

Recommendations

1. Consolidate key information from external documents into the main tender summary for better accessibility.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline