Skip to main content
Tenders

Design and construction works for the extension of Oru School's art classroom

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306130
Value
€121,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of design and construction works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€121,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Execution of design (preparation of working designs for electrical, low-voltage, ventilation, water and sewage, and heating systems) and construction works for the extension of Oru School's art classroom. Working designs for the structural and architectural parts of the extension already exist. The art classroom extension will be built on top of the current open terrace area.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-13 09:00:00.
--The tender is not divided into parts, as the construction work forms a single whole.
--Any reference to a standard or other basis in the procurement documents shall be read as supplemented by the remark "or equivalent".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must adhere to the conditions outlined in the "vastustingimused.pdf" document, which covers joint offers, business secrets, subcontractor engagement, and general submission requirements.
--Bidders may rely on the capacities of other entities if they can prove that they will have the means to perform the contract (e.g., by providing the consent of the other entity - "Teise ettevõtja nõusolek.docx").
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is for design and construction works for the extension of the art classroom at Oru School.
--Bidders must follow applicable legislation, norms, and the provided technical specification and project documentation ("Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf", "Lisa 4 Tööprojekt.asice").
--A Project Manager CV must be submitted, including personal data, date of birth, and professional certificate number, to assess their qualifications for the project ("Lisa 2 vorm 3 – Projektijuhi CV.docx").
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of design and construction works will be the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score ("306130_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf").
--The value of the tender is 121,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306130_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for criminal convictions to ensure reliable contract execution.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306130_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines conditions for joint submissions, marking trade secrets, subcontracting requirements, and general submission rules essential for a successful bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306130_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates bids primarily based on the total cost of design and construction works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306130_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.9 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and qualification requirements, to be completed electronically.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 206.1 KB

The contracting authority seeks a general contractor for the design and construction of the Oru School art classroom extension, requiring adherence to applicable laws, norms, and the provided technical specification and project documentation.

Lisa 2 vorm 2 - Teise ettevõtja nõusolekDOC
Lisa 2 vorm 2 – Teise ettevõtja nõusolek.docx -- 19.0 KB

This document is a third-party consent form confirming that the bidder can rely on the other entity's qualifications to meet eligibility criteria and participate in contract execution.

Lisa 3 vorm 3 - Projektijuhi CVDOC
Lisa 2 vorm 3 – Projektijuhi CV.docx -- 18.5 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of a Project Manager's CV, including personal details, date of birth, and professional certificate number, to assess their qualifications for the Oru School art classroom expansion design and construction works.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 3 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 297.6 KB

This document is a draft of the construction contract for the Oru School art classroom extension, outlining the parties, scope of work, and general terms.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 283.0 KB

Lääne-Nigula Municipality invites bids for the design and construction works of the Oru School art classroom extension, with a submission deadline of April 13, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of an art classroom extension at Oru School is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external documents for full understanding.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear process. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached files. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and further detailed in a specific document, indicating a structured approach.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and tender validity. However, the full scope and specific technical details are heavily reliant on attached documents, which may not all be fully accessible or interpretable without the tender platform.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for reliance on third-party capacities and permits joint offers, promoting broader participation. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a positive aspect. The evaluation criterion is primarily cost-based, which is objective. E-procurement is utilized.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is not detailed. The duration is specified in days, which is practical.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender is not divided into parts, which is explained logically.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text. The tender does not indicate EU funding.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Strengths

Clear description of works and objectives.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Provision for reliance on third-party capacities and joint offers.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Logical explanation for not dividing the tender into parts.

Concerns

Heavy reliance on external documents for full understanding.
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Missing contract start date and detailed financing information.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential contract details, such as the start date, are clearly stated within the main tender document or easily accessible.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability or innovation criteria in future tenders to align with modern procurement practices.
3. Provide summaries or key excerpts of critical attached documents within the main tender description for improved accessibility.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline