Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login13 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
The contracting authority requires a power of attorney for joint bidders, a description of trade secrets, confirmation of compliance with tender conditions, and the submission of a cost breakdown.
This document provides information on the cost breakdown for the design phase of the Tsirguliina cultural center, forming part of the tender budget.
This document outlines the bidder evaluation process, where the cost of works is the sole evaluation criterion, and the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as initial proof of meeting qualification requirements and exclusion grounds set by the contracting authority, but it is not filled out directly.
The draft contract project defines the object of the construction contract for the Tsirguliina cultural center, the rights and obligations of the parties, and the basis for contract execution.
The technical specification defines the technical requirements, standards, and conditions for the construction of the Tsirguliina Cultural Center that bidders must meet.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for the construction of the Tsirguliina Cultural Center is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and financial information. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on cost as the sole evaluation criterion, which could be a concern for quality.
The tender appears compliant with standard procurement procedures, including clear CPV codes, a reasonable submission deadline, and a defined contract duration. There is no immediate indication of disputes or regulatory issues. The 'A' procedure type suggests a standard open procedure.
The project description is clear about its objective to build a modern, energy-efficient cultural center. Technical requirements are detailed in the 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. The evaluation criteria, though solely based on cost, are stated.
Most essential information like value, duration, and deadlines are present. However, the 'Hankepass' (ESPD) not being directly filled out and the XML format of another ESPD hindering analysis suggest potential for more streamlined documentation.
The tender is generally fair, with e-submission and e-procurement. The decision not to divide the tender into lots, while explained, might lead to a less competitive market. The sole reliance on cost as the evaluation criterion can be seen as potentially limiting for bidders focused on value beyond price.
E-submission is available. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is partially indicated by the EU funding mention, but more detail would be beneficial for bidders.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated consistently. Dates for submission and opening are logically sequenced. No suspension or disputes are indicated.
While the project aims for an 'energy-efficient' cultural center, explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation are not detailed in the provided summaries. The mention of EU funding indicates a broader program context, but specific sustainable elements within the tender are not highlighted.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required