Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Maintenance works for cooling equipment of Mustamäe корпуса 2

Open
Deadline
15 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305928
Value
€200,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
The cost of the offer is evaluated - Excluding taxes100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€200,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Performance of maintenance works for cooling equipment of Mustamäe корпусов B, C, X and Y.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for cooling equipment maintenance at Põhja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla's Mustamäe campus is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant price while demonstrating robust technical capability and adherence to exclusion criteria. Differentiation will be challenging due to the 100% cost weighting, making meticulous cost management and a clear understanding of the technical requirements paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromisingly Competitive Pricing for Reliable Cooling System Maintenance.

Guaranteed Compliance and Operational Continuity for Critical Healthcare Infrastructure.

Key Opportunities
Leverage the Hankepass as a self-declaration tool to streamline the submission process and potentially reduce administrative overhead, which can be passed on as cost savings.
Focus on operational efficiencies and lean processes to achieve the lowest possible bid price, given the 100% cost weighting.
Thoroughly understand and address the technical requirements for uninterrupted operation to avoid potential penalties or re-work, which could impact profitability.
Key Challenges
The 100% cost weighting makes it difficult to differentiate on anything other than price, potentially leading to a race to the bottom.

Focus on optimizing internal costs and supply chain efficiencies to offer the lowest viable price while maintaining profitability. Clearly articulate the value proposition of reliability and expertise in the bid narrative, even if not directly scored.

Ensuring absolute compliance with the exclusion grounds regarding Russian Federation connections, as any breach will lead to disqualification.

Implement a rigorous due diligence process for all subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written declarations from all parties involved confirming no Russian Federation connections. Maintain clear audit trails.

The Hankepass, while a self-declaration, requires careful and accurate completion to be accepted as valid preliminary evidence.

Dedicate sufficient time and resources to accurately complete the Hankepass, cross-referencing with all other tender documentation. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if any part is unclear.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized HVAC maintenance provider with a proven track record in large healthcare facilities, possessing efficient operational processes and strong supplier relationships to enable competitive pricing. They must also have a robust compliance framework to ensure no Russian Federation connections and a clear understanding of the Hankepass self-declaration process.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of familiarization with tender conditions and submission of a compliant bid.
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Technical description adherence for uninterrupted operation of cooling equipment.
Completed price offer form compliant with evaluation criteria.
Proper completion and submission of the Hankepass (Procurement Pass).
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably the lowest compliant bid price.
A clear and concise explanation of how operational efficiencies translate into cost savings for the client, even if not explicitly scored.
A proactive and transparent approach to compliance, particularly regarding the Russian Federation exclusion criteria.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a scored criterion, consider a brief mention of commitment to local employment or sustainable operational practices if it can be achieved without impacting cost competitiveness. This might resonate with the contracting authority's broader organizational values.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of the offer (excluding taxes)100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price that is still profitable. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and negotiate favorable terms with suppliers. Ensure all pricing is clear and directly reflects the scope of work.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. Conduct a thorough cost analysis, identify all efficiencies, and ensure the price is competitive while maintaining a sustainable profit margin.

Directly determines the highest score in the evaluation.
Meticulous Hankepass Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass is completed accurately and comprehensively, as it serves as the primary self-declaration. Pay close attention to all sections, especially those related to exclusion grounds and eligibility.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Robust Russian Federation Exclusion Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Implement a strict due diligence process for all potential subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written confirmations of no Russian Federation connections and maintain clear records for audit purposes.

Prevents disqualification due to mandatory exclusion grounds.
Clarify Technical Scope Ambiguities
HighLow effort

Review the technical description thoroughly. If any aspects of the maintenance and repair requirements for the cooling equipment are unclear, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority to ensure a fully compliant and accurate technical proposal.

Ensures a compliant technical solution and avoids potential disputes or additional costs.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
MediumLow effort

While cost is paramount, subtly highlight how your operational efficiencies and expertise contribute to reliable, uninterrupted service. This can be framed as a value-add that complements the low price.

Adds perceived value beyond just the lowest price.
Accurate Price Offer Form
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the price offer form is completed precisely as per the tender instructions, with all figures aligning with the evaluation criteria (excluding taxes). Double-check all calculations.

Directly impacts the evaluation score and ensures compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential technical capability and compliance. Emphasize streamlined operations and a lean business model that allows for aggressive pricing.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a completed price offer form.
--The data in the price offer form must comply with the evaluation criteria presented in the tender documents.
--The tender pass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the expected response format.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm they have familiarized themselves with the tender conditions and submitted a compliant bid.
--Bidders must confirm they are not engaging subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Bidders must provide information regarding trade secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The technical description defines the requirements for maintenance and repair of cooling equipment in Mustamäe корпусов B, C, X, and Y to ensure their uninterrupted operation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender value is 200,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305928_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.9 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and provide information on trade secrets and, for joint bids, a power of attorney.

Kas ettevõtja kinnitab dokumendis Hankemenetluses osalemise avalduses sätestatud...DOC
305928 Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus.docx -- 50.9 KB

The bidder must confirm that they have reviewed the tender procedure conditions and submitted a compliant bid.

Kas pakkuja on täitnud "305928 Hinnapakkumuse vormi"? Juhul kui hind erineb vahe...XLS
305928 Hinnapakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 19.3 KB

The bidder must submit a completed price offer form, with data consistent with the evaluation criteria presented in the tender document.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305928_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, and determines the winner by lottery in case of equal bids.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305928_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

The Procurement Pass (Hankepass) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
305928 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 27.0 KB

This technical specification defines the requirements for maintenance and repair works of cooling equipment in Mustamäe buildings B, C, X, and Y to ensure their uninterrupted operation.

Lepingu projektDOC
Seadmete hooldus- ja remonttoode teostamise l... -- 49.5 KB

This document is the draft framework agreement for the maintenance of cooling equipment at the Mustamäe campus of the North Estonia Medical Centre, outlining the terms of service provision and the contracting parties.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for cooling equipment maintenance is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor documentation completeness issues.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the technical requirements are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the lottery mechanism for equal bids is unusual. Conditions for participation are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of explicit details on financing and the limited number of attached documents (some in unsupported formats) slightly reduce completeness.

Some documents in unsupported formats (.xml, .zip) for AI analysis.
Lack of explicit financing information.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and criteria are objective, though the lottery for equal bids is a point of note. E-procurement is utilized. The 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual and could be perceived as restrictive if not justified by the nature of the service.

Maximum Participants set to 1, which might be overly restrictive if not clearly justified.
Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the potential ambiguity of the 'Max Participants: 1' requirement could pose minor practical challenges.

Lack of explicit financing information.
Potential ambiguity of 'Max Participants: 1'.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical description and requirements.
Well-defined timeline and deadlines.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Disclosure of estimated value and CPV code.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Unusual 'Max Participants: 1' setting.
Some documents in unsupported formats for analysis.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria into future tenders.
2. Provide clear justification for the 'Max Participants: 1' setting or consider removing it.
3. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline