Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction Works for Karlova School Sports Field

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305673
Value
€300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 03, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price excluding contractor's reserve and VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€300,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement contract is the reconstruction works of the sports field of Tartu Karlova School (Lina tn 2) in accordance with the technical description of the public procurement.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-30 11:00:00.
--Bidders must comply with the conditions for joint offers, business secrets, and subcontractor engagement as outlined in "vastavustingimused.pdf".
--The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score, as per "hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority may exclude economic operators in relation to which there are grounds for exclusion referred to in Section 42(1) of the Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Economic operators must confirm compliance with qualification requirements using the provided ESPD (in XML format).
--Economic operators must provide explanations and evidence regarding the background check of subcontractors for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must adhere to the technical specifications provided in "Tehniline kirjeldus.docx".
--Bidders must provide a detailed price breakdown for all construction work items as per "Pakkumuse hinnatabel.xlsx".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The maximum budget for the construction works is 300,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305673_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305673_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines conditions for joint tenders, trade secrets, subcontractor involvement, and bid submission, which are necessary for participating in the Karlova School sports field construction tender.

Pakkumuse hinnatabelXLS
Pakkumuse hinnatabel.xlsx -- 18.2 KB

The bid price table lists detailed construction work items, quantities, and units that bidders must price for the Karlova school sports field construction tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305673_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Karlova school sports field construction tender, where the bid price is the sole evaluation method and the lowest bid receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305673_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.7 KB

The tender pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the qualification requirements set by the contracting authority, but it is not filled out directly through this document.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.doc -- 67.0 KB

The contract document is the foundational agreement defining the terms and legal framework for the construction works in the Karlova school sports field tender.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 45.0 KB

This document provides additional information for the construction works of the Karlova school sports field tender, which is necessary for preparing the bid.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 13.5 KB

This technical specification contains details of the construction project for the Karlova School sports field, necessary for preparing a bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Karlova School's sports field construction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a defined process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve accessibility of certain documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including proper CPV coding and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The procedure is a standard procurement type.

Clarity80/100

Requirements are clearly documented, with specific files (Technical Specification, Price Table, Contract) referenced for detailed understanding. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as relative weighting, with the lowest price being the sole determinant.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key mandatory documents like technical specifications and contract templates are provided. However, some additional information is referenced in external documents ('Lisateave', 'vastavustingimused.pdf') without direct content summaries, which might require additional steps from bidders.

Some critical additional information is only referenced by filename, requiring external access.
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and utilizes e-procurement. Criteria are objective, focusing solely on price. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Access to documents is generally good, though the ESPD is in XML format which may not be directly analyzed by all systems.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a contract start date is provided. Financing information is implied through the estimated value. However, the provision of URLs for all required documents could be improved, as some are only referenced by filename.

URLs for all referenced requirement documents are not directly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and financial details are populated consistently. Dates for reveal, submission, and opening are logical and within reasonable bounds. No issues with suspensions or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area has significant room for improvement to align with modern procurement standards.

Lack of explicit green or social procurement criteria.
No mention of innovation.

Strengths

Clear and defined technical requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement system.
Well-structured basic information.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations.
Reliance on external document references without direct URLs for some key files.
ESPD in XML format may pose accessibility challenges for some bidders.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green or social procurement criteria.
2. Provide direct URLs for all referenced tender documents.
3. Consider providing a more accessible format for the ESPD if possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline