Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Furnishing of Käo Support Centre (Võidujooksu tn 18)

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305630
Value
€500,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 03, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€500,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
79
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase, delivery, and installation of furnishings for the Käo Support Centre building.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the furnishing of Käo Tugikeskus is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible price while meticulously adhering to all technical specifications and ensuring a seamless procurement process. While social and green aspects are not explicitly required, demonstrating a commitment to quality and durability can indirectly enhance value perception.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective solution for high-quality, durable furniture, delivered and installed efficiently.

Key Opportunities
Directly address the 100% cost-based evaluation by offering the absolute lowest price.
Leverage efficient supply chain and manufacturing to achieve cost savings that can be passed on to the client.
Thoroughly document compliance with technical specifications to avoid disqualification and build trust.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct a rigorous cost-benefit analysis of all components, optimize logistics, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising essential quality or safety standards. Consider bulk purchasing or pre-negotiated supplier rates.

Ensuring absolute adherence to detailed technical specifications for all furniture items.

Implement a multi-stage internal review process involving technical experts and procurement specialists. Create detailed checklists for each furniture item against the specifications in 'Lisa 1_1 Toodete kirjeldus osa 1'. Use the blue-marked cells as a direct compliance matrix.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A furniture supplier with a strong track record in public procurement, possessing efficient supply chain management, cost-effective manufacturing or sourcing capabilities, and proven experience in delivering and installing furniture for institutional settings. The bidder should be adept at detailed technical compliance and possess the capacity to offer competitive pricing.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Public Procurement Act (RHS) and tender documents.
Submission of a valid Hankepass (ESPD).
Detailed technical compliance with furniture specifications (dimensions, materials, finishes).
Lowest total bid cost (excluding taxes) for maximum score.
Completion of cost tables for Part 1 and Part 2.
Purchase, delivery, and installation of new, high-quality, safe, and durable furniture.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a clear and verifiable cost advantage through optimized operations and supply chain, backed by a robust pricing structure.
Exceptional attention to detail in technical compliance, presenting a perfectly aligned offer that leaves no room for ambiguity or technical queries.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider a brief statement on the durability and longevity of the furniture, implying reduced waste and long-term value, which aligns with broader sustainability principles without adding explicit cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost (excluding taxes)100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient sourcing, optimized logistics, and potentially leveraging economies of scale. Every Euro saved translates directly into a higher score.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid price (excluding taxes). This requires a deep dive into cost optimization across sourcing, manufacturing, logistics, and installation. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising mandatory technical requirements.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Technical Compliance Verification
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1_1 Toodete kirjeldus osa 1' and ensure every single technical specification (dimensions, materials, finishes) is met. Use the blue-marked cells as a direct compliance matrix. Any deviation risks disqualification. This requires a dedicated technical review team.

Ensures bid is not disqualified on technical grounds.
Accurate Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, as it serves as the primary proof of eligibility. Pay close attention to any specific instructions or formats required by the contracting authority as outlined in 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'.

Ensures bidder meets eligibility criteria.
Detailed Cost Breakdown and Validation
HighMed effort

Develop a granular cost breakdown for both Part 1 and Part 2 of the bid, ensuring all costs are accounted for and validated. This will not only support the final price but also provide internal justification and allow for quick identification of potential cost-saving opportunities.

Supports competitive pricing and internal cost control.
Proactive Clarification Process
HighLow effort

If any aspect of the technical specifications or tender requirements is unclear, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority well before the submission deadline. This demonstrates diligence and helps avoid costly errors or assumptions.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and potential disqualification.
Highlight Furniture Durability and Quality (Indirectly)
MediumLow effort

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly emphasize the quality and durability of the proposed furniture in the bid narrative or technical compliance section. This can build confidence in the long-term value of the offer, even if cost is the primary driver.

Builds client confidence in the value proposition.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most straightforward, compliant, and cost-effective solution. Emphasize the ability to meet all technical requirements precisely at the lowest possible price, making it the clear choice for the contracting authority's budget-driven decision.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (5)
Financial (5)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-07 12:00:00.
--The tender documents include a draft purchase and sale agreement that regulates the terms and obligations of the tender for the furnishing of Käo Tugikeskus.
--The tender procedure includes the furnishing of Käo Tugikeskus with furniture and inventory.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must comply with the Public Procurement Act (RHS) and tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a Hankepass (tender pass) as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties.
--Bidders must confirm that their offer complies with all conditions set forth in the tender documents.
--If bidding as a joint venture, a power of attorney for the joint bidders must be submitted.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender involves the furnishing of Käo Tugikeskus with furniture and inventory, divided into purchased furniture and custom-made furniture.
--The tender seeks the purchase, delivery, and installation of furniture and inventory for Käo Tugikeskus, requiring new, high-quality, safe, and durable furniture and inventory.
--The required furniture items, their quantities, and placement locations for furnishing Käo Tugikeskus are described in detail.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS5
--The total value of the tender is 500,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated to find the most economically advantageous bid, where the lowest cost without taxes will receive the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit the cost of their bid.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305630_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 26.7 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents, including submitting the bid price and, if applicable, a power of attorney for joint bidders.

Lisa 2_1 Maksumuse vorm osa 1XLS
305630_Lisa 2_1 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel osa... -- 54.4 KB

The bidder must submit the cost form for Part 1 of the Käo Support Center's furnishings as part of the tender submission.

Lisa 2_2 Maksumuse vorm osa 2XLS
305630_Lisa 2_2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel osa... -- 50.9 KB

This document is Part 2 of the cost table that the bidder must complete for the public procurement "Käo Tugikeskus Furnishing".

Lisa 3 Tehniline vastavus osa 1XLS
305630_Lisa 3 Tehnilise vastavus osa 1.xlsx -- 35.4 KB

The bidder must provide data according to the requirements in this document to prove compliance with the technical description, filling in the blue-marked fields regarding the technical requirements for furniture and inventory.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305630_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids to find the most economically advantageous offer, where the lowest cost excluding taxes will receive the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305630_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 81.6 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and the format of expected responses.

AlusdokumentDOC
305630_Alusdokument.docx -- 49.1 KB

The procurement procedure involves furnishing Käo Tugikeskus with furniture and inventory, divided into purchased furniture and custom-made furniture sections, requiring bidders to comply with the Public Procurement Act and tender documents.

Lisa 1_1 Toodete kirjeldus osa 1XLS
305630_Lisa 1_1 Osa 1_ toodete kirjeldus.xlsx -- 2.9 MB

This document details the furniture items included in the tender, specifying their dimensions, materials, and finishes to ensure bidder compliance with requirements.

Lisa 1_2 Toodete kirjeldus osa 2XLS
305630_Lisa 1_2 Osa 2_toodete kirjeldus.xlsx -- 11.0 KB

This document precisely details the required furniture items, their quantities, and placement locations for the furnishing of Käo Tugikeskus.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
305630_Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 22.5 KB

The contracting authority seeks the purchase, delivery, and installation of furniture and inventory for Käo Tugikeskus, requiring new, high-quality, safe, and durable goods.

Lisa 4 Lepingu kavandDOC
305630_Lisa 4_Lepingu kavand.docx -- 50.8 KB

This document is a draft purchase and sale agreement outlining the terms and obligations for the supply of furniture for Käo Tugikeskus.

Lisa 5 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa_5_Ühispakkujate_volikiri.docx -- 22.7 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one joint bidder to act on behalf of others in the tender procedure and contract conclusion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

79
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the furnishing of Käo Tugikeskus is well-structured and largely compliant with procurement standards. Key information is present, though contract duration is missing. Sustainability aspects are lightly addressed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement principles, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable and the process appears compliant with regulations. No disputes are noted. The inclusion of a draft agreement and specific submission forms contributes to legal soundness.

Clarity85/100

The description of the required furniture and installation is detailed, with technical specifications provided in multiple documents. Requirements for bidders, including mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria, are clearly stated. The reliance on specific filled-in forms enhances clarity of expected responses.

Completeness75/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and organizational details. However, the contract duration is not specified. While 14 documents are listed, the status of mandatory vs. optional documents could be more explicit in some cases.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. Access to all necessary documentation is provided. The evaluation criteria, focusing on the most economically advantageous bid with cost as the primary driver, are objective. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality70/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality. Financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value. The contract start date is not explicitly provided. The ability to divide into parts might increase accessibility for smaller bidders.

Missing contract start date
Data Consistency95/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are consistent and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some consideration for environmental aspects. However, there is no detailed information or specific requirements related to social criteria or innovation within the provided text. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of detailed social and innovation criteria
Not explicitly EU funded

Strengths

Clear technical specifications for furniture
E-submission and e-procurement facilitated
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost)
Detailed mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Limited details on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'
Missing contract start date

Recommendations

1. Explicitly state the contract duration.
2. Provide more concrete details on 'Green Procurement' objectives and any social or innovation criteria.
3. Include the contract start date for better planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline