Skip to main content
Tenders

Development, maintenance and evolution of the mobile application of the Riga City Municipality

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
163826
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€220,792
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
2,497 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development, maintenance and evolution of the mobile application of the Riga City Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163826_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260311051002.pdf -- 94.7 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements, as well as evaluation criteria, for the development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
1.pielikums_Tehniskā specifikācija iepirkumam... -- 288.5 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application, outlining its purpose, architecture, functional and non-functional requirements, and development phases.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for the open tender CAIP 2026/11 concerning the development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the development, maintenance, and evolution of a mobile application for Riga City Municipality is generally well-structured, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the main notice and the reliance on attached documents for detailed requirements reduce overall clarity for initial assessment.

Missing evaluation criteria in main notice
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are present. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like evaluation criteria and specific exclusion/eligibility requirements are not readily available in the main notice, requiring access to attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified in main notice
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, restricted document access and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria in the main notice could be perceived as hindering full transparency and fairness.

Restricted document access
Evaluation criteria not disclosed in main notice
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of explicit mention of financing information and the potential for restricted document access could pose minor practical challenges.

Potential restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported, indicating logical data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procurement procedure
E-procurement utilized
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified in main notice
Restricted document access
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly state evaluation criteria in the main tender notice.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline