Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Pyrolysis-based mixed plastic waste oil production line

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305162
Value
€7,890,100
Location
Estonia
Published
March 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the tender60%
Average yield of production (input weight vs oil output)20%
Required number of production workers (FTE) for line operation10%
Spare part availability speed10%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€7,890,100
Duration
12 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€91,816
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
473 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

OÜ Recycling DME is procuring a pyrolysis-based production line capable of producing a minimum of 9000 tons of unstilled plastic oil per year. The production of unstilled plastic oil takes place in two stages, requiring two separate production line segments: 1. Pre-treatment and crushing of unsorted and unclassified plastic waste 2. Thermal processing of pre-treated waste in a reactor system The production line will be installed in Estonia, Narva city, Elektrijaama tee 94, in December 2026 and will have a work guarantee. More detailed requirements are listed in the technical requirements document.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses heavily on cost and technical performance, with a significant weighting on total cost (60%). Bidders must demonstrate a highly cost-effective solution while exceeding minimum technical specifications, particularly in oil yield. Leveraging existing, proven pyrolysis technology and optimizing operational efficiency will be key to winning.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Leadership through Optimized Pyrolysis Technology

Superior Operational Efficiency and Yield

Reliable, Long-Term Partnership with Proven Technology

Key Opportunities
Exceeding the minimum 65% oil yield requirement to gain significant evaluation points.
Offering a highly competitive total cost, given its 60% weighting in the evaluation.
Demonstrating rapid spare part availability to secure maximum points in this criterion.
Leveraging proven, off-the-shelf pyrolysis technology to reduce risk and potentially lower costs.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 60% weighting on total cost.

Focus on lean manufacturing, efficient supply chain management, and potentially offering tiered solutions or financing options if permissible. Highlight the total cost of ownership, not just upfront price.

Meeting the stringent spare part availability requirement of max 10 days.

Establish a robust local or regional spare parts depot, secure agreements with key suppliers for expedited delivery, and detail the logistics and inventory management plan in the bid.

Ensuring the production line consistently meets or exceeds the 65% oil yield during testing.

Provide detailed technical specifications and operational parameters that guarantee this yield. Offer performance guarantees and potentially a bonus for exceeding the yield target.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established manufacturer of pyrolysis equipment with a proven track record in delivering similar-scale industrial processing lines. The ideal bidder will possess strong engineering capabilities, a robust supply chain for rapid spare parts delivery, and a deep understanding of plastic waste processing and its by-products, including MSDS compliance. Experience with installations in Eastern Europe and a strong financial standing are essential.
Key Requirements
Pyrolysis-based production line with minimum 9000 tons/year capacity
Total cost of the tender (60% evaluation weight)
Average oil yield of production (20% evaluation weight)
Design, delivery, installation, and personnel training
Spare part availability speed (max 10 days)
Average annual turnover of at least 5,000,000 EUR
Bid validity of at least 2 months
Key Discriminators
Proven track record of delivering similar-scale pyrolysis plants with documented performance metrics (yield, uptime).
Innovative approach to waste pre-treatment that maximizes feedstock efficiency and minimizes operational costs.
Exceptional after-sales support and training program that goes beyond the minimum requirements.
Commitment to long-term partnership and continuous improvement of the production line's performance.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to local employment and training opportunities in Narva during the installation and commissioning phases, potentially partnering with local vocational schools or employment agencies.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of the tender60.0%

Present a highly competitive price. Detail cost breakdown to demonstrate value. Highlight long-term operational cost savings through efficiency and reliability.

Average yield of production20.0%

Propose a yield significantly above the 65% minimum. Provide detailed technical justification and data from similar installations. Offer performance guarantees tied to yield.

Required number of production workers (FTE) for line operation10.0%

Propose an optimized staffing level that demonstrates efficiency without compromising safety or operational integrity. Highlight automation where applicable to reduce FTE requirements.

Spare part availability speed10.0%

Guarantee availability within 10 days. Detail the spare parts management system, including inventory levels, logistics, and supplier agreements. Offer a premium service for critical parts.

Recommendations7
Aggressively Price for Cost Leadership
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 60% weighting, the bid must be highly competitive on price. Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify areas for optimization without compromising quality or performance.

Maximizes score in the most heavily weighted evaluation criterion.
Exceed Minimum Yield Target
CriticalHigh effort

Aim for a yield significantly above 65%. Provide robust technical evidence and performance data to support the claimed yield, ensuring it is achievable and verifiable during testing.

Secures maximum points for the 20% weighted yield criterion.
Demonstrate Proven Pyrolysis Technology
CriticalMed effort

Highlight the maturity and reliability of the proposed pyrolysis technology. Provide case studies and references of similar-scale installations to build confidence in its performance and longevity.

Reduces perceived risk for the procurer and reinforces technical capability.
Detail Spare Parts Logistics
CriticalMed effort

Provide a comprehensive plan for spare parts availability within 10 days, including inventory management, local warehousing (if applicable), and expedited shipping agreements. This is a key evaluation point.

Addresses a critical evaluation criterion and mitigates operational downtime risk.
Offer Comprehensive Training and Support
HighMed effort

Go beyond the basic training requirement by offering extended support, on-site operational assistance, and a clear maintenance schedule. This adds value and builds client confidence.

Enhances perceived value and strengthens client relationship.
Ensure Complete and Accurate Documentation
HighHigh effort

Meticulously review all tender documents, forms, and technical requirements. Ensure all submitted documents are in Estonian or English, complete, and signed where necessary. Pay close attention to Forms 1 and 6 if subcontractors are used.

Avoids disqualification and ensures a smooth evaluation process.
Propose Local Employment Initiatives
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to prioritize local hiring for installation and operational roles in Narva, and potentially offer training programs for local residents.

Addresses potential social value expectations and enhances community relations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that *exceeds* technical requirements, particularly in oil yield. Emphasize reliability and proven technology to counter potential concerns about lower bids from less experienced suppliers. Highlight the total cost of ownership, including operational efficiency and minimal downtime due to rapid spare parts availability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

25 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (7)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bids must adhere to general public procurement principles.
--Confirmation of the absence of sanctions is required.
--Bids must be submitted in Estonian or English.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--No evidence of tax arrears.
--No presence of international sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted in Estonian or English.
--Bid validity must be at least 2 months after the submission deadline.
--If joint tenderers are used, a Power of Authority document (Form No 2) must be provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--The production line must be pyrolysis-based.
--The production line must be capable of producing at least 9000 tons of plastic oil annually.
--The scope includes waste pre-treatment and thermal processing.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Average annual turnover for the last three financial years must be at least 5,000,000 EUR.
--Proof of financial solvency is required.
--Turnover must be confirmed by annual reports or extracts (Form No 1).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305162_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.7 KB

The contracting authority requires tenderers to comply with terms and conditions, submit a technical specification, provide a schedule description, and confirm the absence of sanctions.

Form No 1 "Turnover"DOC
Form No 1 Turnover.docx -- 23.0 KB

The tender requires Form No 1 'Turnover' to prove the bidder's overall turnover for the last three financial years, for which annual reports or extracts must be submitted.

If subcontractors are used, Form No 3 "List of subcontractors" is filled.DOC
Form No 3 List of subcontractors.docx -- 18.8 KB

The tenderer requires submission on Form No. 6 if subcontractors are used, listing their details and the works or services provided.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305162_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on total cost, number of production workers, spare part availability speed, and average production yield.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305162_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 13.6 KB

The procurer requires bidders to provide proof of absence of tax debt, country of seat, solvency, absence of international sanctions, and an average annual turnover of at least 5,000,000 euros for the last three financial years.

1. Procurement documentDOC
1 Procurement document.docx -- 2.3 MB

Bidders must submit tenders in Estonian or English, adhering to general public procurement principles, and ensure tender validity for at least 2 months after the submission deadline.

2. Technical requirementsDOC
2 Technical requirements.docx -- 757.3 KB

The procurer OÜ Recycling DME seeks a pyrolysis-based production line capable of producing at least 9000 tons of plastic oil annually, encompassing waste pre-treatment and thermal processing, requiring design, delivery, installation, and staff training.

3 Description of the Evaluation MethodologyDOC
3 Description of the Evaluation Methodology.d... -- 35.1 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, focusing on economic advantage (best value for money) and defining point allocation based on total cost and workforce requirements.

4. Procurement contractDOC
4 Procurement contract.docx -- 57.5 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms for design, delivery, and installation works, defining the parties involved and their obligations.

5. Oli MSDS ENGPDF
5 Oli MSDS ENG.pdf -- 432.2 KB

This safety data sheet outlines the properties, hazards, and safe handling of pyrolysis oil, providing essential information for its procurement.

Form No 2 Power of Authority (for joint tender)DOC
Form No 2 Power of Authority (for joint tende... -- 12.9 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one joint tenderer to represent all joint tenderers in the procurement procedure and contract conclusion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a pyrolysis-based plastic waste oil production line is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a defined process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer documentation regarding financing beyond EU funding.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement principles, includes a CPV code, and has a reasonable timeline. The procedure type (MS) and status (11) are indicated. While no disputes are noted, the 'Additional Info' section clarifies that OÜ Recycling DME is not a public procurement entity but will follow general principles, which is a slight deviation from standard public tenders but acceptable given the context of EU funding.

Clarity80/100

The description of the production line and its two-stage process is clear. Technical requirements are detailed in a separate document, and evaluation criteria are mentioned. The language used is professional and understandable.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and location. Key documents like technical requirements, qualification criteria, and submission forms are referenced. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and detailed financing information beyond 'EU Funded' is limited.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria for evaluation are based on relative weighting, which is standard. The use of e-submission and e-procurement promotes fairness. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. A document URL is not provided, which is a drawback. The contract duration is specified, and financing is indicated as EU funded. The absence of a direct document URL impacts practicality.

No direct URL provided for tender documents.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The information provided is consistent across different sections.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and the purpose of producing oil for new plastic products, hinting at circular economy aspects. However, explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus are not detailed within the provided information, limiting the score in this category.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of detailed social or innovation aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical requirements and description of the production line.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Disclosure of estimated value and reasonable timeline.
Adherence to general public procurement principles.

Concerns

Missing direct URL for tender documents.
Limited explicit sustainability criteria.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Provide a direct URL for all tender documents.
2. Incorporate more specific green procurement and social responsibility criteria.
3. Clearly state the intended contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline