Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and Construction Tender for Separate Sewerage System in Kilingi-Nõmme Aia Street Area

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305109
Value
€119,965
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Design-build works total excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€119,965
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The tender will address the drainage of rainwater in the Aia street area of Kilingi-Nõmme. A separate sewerage system will be built, which will reduce the amount of rainwater directed to the wastewater treatment plant and improve rainwater drainage from the apartment building area of Kilingi-Nõmme Aia street.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on a critical infrastructure project with a single evaluation criterion: price. A winning strategy will hinge on meticulous cost management, efficient project delivery, and demonstrating absolute compliance with all technical and submission requirements to avoid disqualification. Leveraging experience in similar infrastructure projects and a clear understanding of local conditions will be paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Value: Delivering the most cost-effective and technically sound solution for Kilingi-Nõmme's separate sewerage system.

Flawless Execution: Guaranteeing timely and compliant project completion through meticulous planning and experienced delivery.

Local Impact: Contributing to improved environmental quality and infrastructure for the Kilingi-Nõmme community.

Key Opportunities
The sole evaluation criterion being price presents a clear path to victory for the most cost-competitive bidder.
The explicit requirement for a separate sewerage system for rainwater and wastewater aligns with common infrastructure development needs, allowing bidders to leverage existing expertise.
The provided site plan and technological project documentation offer a solid foundation for accurate cost estimation and project planning.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% price-based evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, explore bulk purchasing for materials, and ensure all potential costs are accurately captured in the price list to avoid underbidding and subsequent financial strain.

Risk of disqualification due to non-compliance with submission requirements or mandatory exclusion grounds (though not detailed, general compliance is key).

Implement a rigorous bid review process, assign dedicated personnel to check all documentation against the 'HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf' and other stipulated documents, and seek clarification from the contracting authority on any ambiguous requirements well in advance of the deadline.

The tight 7-month duration requires efficient project management and execution.

Develop a detailed project schedule with clear milestones, identify potential bottlenecks early, and ensure sufficient resources (labor, equipment) are allocated to meet the deadline without compromising quality.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in designing and building separate sewerage systems, particularly in residential areas. They should possess strong project management capabilities, a robust supply chain for materials, and a highly efficient operational model to deliver the project within the 7-month timeframe at a competitive price. Experience with Estonian procurement procedures and local regulations is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Adherence to Hankepass requirements and submission format.
Comprehensive and accurate pricing in the price list, covering all works and necessary additional works.
Demonstrated technical capability in designing and constructing separate sewerage systems.
Strict adherence to all contract terms and contracting authority conditions.
Submission of bid in accordance with the procedures outlined in 'HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf'.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in successfully delivering similar separate sewerage system projects within tight deadlines and budgets.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that clearly justifies the proposed price while demonstrating value.
A proactive approach to risk management and a clear plan for addressing potential site-specific challenges (e.g., traffic management, existing utilities) as outlined in the contracting authority's conditions.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the project execution phase. This can be framed as a community benefit and a demonstration of responsible corporate citizenship, even if not directly evaluated.
Bid Focus Areas
Design-build works total excluding VAT100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible price by optimizing design and construction methodologies, securing competitive material and labor costs, and ensuring all project elements are accurately priced. Leverage economies of scale and efficient project management to drive down overall costs. Conduct a thorough review of the 'HD Osa IV Hinnaloendi reeglistik.pdf' and 'HD Osa IV Töömahtude loend.xlsx' to ensure complete and accurate pricing.

Recommendations6
Master the Price: Aggressively Price for Competitiveness
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest viable bid. This requires meticulous cost engineering, optimizing design elements for cost-effectiveness, and securing the most favorable terms from suppliers and subcontractors. Ensure all costs are captured in the price list as per 'HD Osa IV Hinnaloendi reeglistik.pdf'.

Directly impacts the bid's score and win probability.
Ensure Absolute Compliance with Submission Guidelines
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review and adhere to all instructions in 'HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf'. Pay close attention to the Hankepass requirements, power of attorney for joint bidders, and business secret submission procedures. Any deviation can lead to disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Deep Dive into Technical Project and Site Plan
HighMed effort

Thoroughly analyze 'HD III Osa Lisa 1 Tehnoloogilise projekti seletuskiri.pdf' and 'HD III Osa Lisa 2 Projekti joonis (Aia tn-Asendiplaan).pdf'. Understand the technical challenges, site constraints, and specific requirements for the separate sewerage system to ensure an accurate and efficient design and construction plan.

Enables accurate pricing and a robust technical solution.
Proactive Traffic and Site Management Planning
HighMed effort

Review 'HD III Osa Tellija Tingimused_uus.pdf' for requirements on traffic management and protection of objects. Develop a detailed and compliant plan for these aspects to demonstrate foresight and minimize disruption during construction.

Reduces risk of penalties and demonstrates operational competence.
Highlight Proven Experience in Similar Projects
MediumLow effort

While not an explicit evaluation criterion, subtly weave in evidence of successful completion of similar separate sewerage system projects, especially those involving residential areas and within similar timeframes, into the bid narrative or supporting documents where appropriate. This builds confidence in your ability to deliver.

Builds trust and credibility, potentially influencing the contracting authority's perception.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
MediumLow effort

If any part of the tender documents, especially the technical specifications or submission requirements, is unclear, proactively seek clarification from Osaühing Saarde Kommunaal well before the submission deadline. This demonstrates diligence and avoids potential misinterpretations.

Prevents errors and ensures a compliant bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on technical feasibility or compliance. Emphasize efficiency in design and construction to justify the low price. Highlight your understanding of the local context and your ability to deliver the project smoothly, addressing potential site-specific challenges proactively.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bidders must follow the procedure of the tender process as explained in the "HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf" document.
--Bidders must adhere to the requirements for submitting bids as explained in the "HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf" document.
--The structure of the tender documents must be followed as explained in the "HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf" document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided document summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide a Hankepass (bidder's own confirmation) as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties.
--The Hankepass must contain the conditions set by the contracting authority and the expected response format.
--Requirements regarding power of attorney for joint bidders are specified.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The project involves designing and constructing a separate sewerage system for rainwater and wastewater.
--The technological project describes technical solutions, goals, and planned activities for building a separate sewerage system.
--A site plan for the sewerage construction project is provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score for evaluating the bid cost.
--The price list must cover all costs of the works and include all necessary additional works.
--Principles for filling out the price list, cost allocation, and payment for works are defined.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305109_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.3 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, business secret submission, and subcontractor engagement conditions, which are necessary for tender submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305109_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score to determine the best design-build service provider.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305109_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 45.8 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Osa III Lisa 1 Tehnoloogilise projekti seletuskiriPDF
HD III Osa Lisa 1 Tehnoloogilise projekti sel... -- 522.6 KB

This technological project outlines the technical solutions, objectives, and planned activities for the design and construction tender of the Kilingi-Nõmme Aia street residential area's separate sewage system.

Osa III Lisa 2 Projekti joonisPDF
HD III Osa Lisa 2 Projekti joonis (Aia tn-Ase... -- 388.0 KB

This drawing displays the site plan for the Kilingi-Nõmme Aia street area's sewage separation construction project, essential for planning and executing the construction works.

Osa III Tellija tingimusedPDF
HD Osa III Tellija Tingimused_uus.pdf -- 658.6 KB

This document outlines the contracting authority's conditions for the Kilingi-Nõmme Aia street sewage design-build tender, including general requirements, notification, protection of assets, and traffic management.

Osa II Lepingu tingimusedPDF
HD Osa II Lepingu tingimused.pdf -- 431.0 KB

This document outlines the contract terms for the design and construction of the Kilingi-Nõmme Aia street residential area's sewerage, including parties, object, and related documents.

Osa I Juhised pakkujalePDF
HD Osa I Juhised pakkujatele uus.pdf -- 329.4 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders, outlining the tender procedure, submission requirements, and the structure of tender documents for the Kilingi-Nõmme Aia street sewage design-build tender.

Osa IV Hinnaloendi reeglistikPDF
HD Osa IV Hinnaloendi reeglistik.pdf -- 211.0 KB

This document outlines the principles for filling out the price list, cost allocation, and payment for works, emphasizing that the price list must cover all work costs and include all necessary ancillary works.

Osa IV Töömahtude loendXLS
HD Osa IV Töömahtude loend.xlsx -- 10.9 KB

The tender seeks proposals for the design and construction of a separated sewerage system in the Aia street area of Kilingi-Nõmme apartment buildings, with the bill of quantities detailing the construction works for surface water and wastewater sewers.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of a separate sewerage system in Kilingi-Nõmme is well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable process. While it meets most standard procurement requirements, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there is no indication of disputes. Regulatory compliance is implied through the financing conditions.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented across various attached documents. Evaluation criteria are specified, and conditions are generally clear, although some detailed instructions are within separate documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the full extent of all required documents and their specific content is spread across multiple files, which could be more consolidated.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective, and e-procurement is utilized. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competition.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is implied through the tender document structure. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, but financing information and duration are provided. The reliance on multiple separate documents for full understanding might slightly reduce practicality.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While EU funding is present, it is not leveraged to promote specific sustainability goals within the tender's criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Comprehensive documentation structure across multiple files.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Information spread across numerous separate documents.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement best practices.
2. Consider consolidating key instructions and requirements into fewer, more accessible documents for improved bidder experience.
3. Clearly state the anticipated contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline