Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Contrast Media

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
304654
Value
€3,856,785
Location
Estonia
Published
March 10, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the drug joheksool (solution for injection, 647 mg/ml)100%
Total cost of the drug joheksool (solution for injection, 755 mg/ml)100%
Total cost of the drug jodiksanool100%
Total cost of the drug sulfur hexafluoride+phospholipid microspheres100%
Total cost of the drug joheksool (solution for injection, 518 mg/ml)100%
Total cost of the drug jopromiid100%
Total cost of the drug barium sulfate100%
Total cost of the drug gadoxetic acid100%
Total cost of the drug ethyl esters of iodinated fatty acids100%
Total cost of the drug gadoteric acid100%
Total cost of the drug gadobutrol100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€3,856,785
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of contrast media
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender prioritizes cost-effectiveness for contrast agents, with a strong emphasis on compliance with exclusion grounds and technical specifications. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest price for 'joheksool' while demonstrating robust supply chain integrity and technical capability.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Value: Delivering the most cost-effective solution for 'joheksool' while meeting all technical requirements.

Supply Chain Assurance: Guaranteeing a secure and compliant supply chain, free from geopolitical risks.

Technical Excellence: Providing precisely specified contrast agents or validated equivalents.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price for 'joheksool' offers a clear path to maximizing evaluation scores if competitive pricing can be achieved.
The explicit exclusion of Russian Federation-connected entities simplifies the competitive landscape by eliminating certain potential competitors.
The requirement for equivalent products if exact matches are unavailable allows for flexibility in product offering, potentially leveraging existing stock or preferred suppliers.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price for 'joheksool' creates uncertainty regarding the weighting of technical aspects and other factors.

Proactively address all technical requirements with comprehensive detail and clarity in the technical proposal. Assume technical compliance is a baseline, and price is the primary differentiator.

The absence of a specified duration for the contract could lead to uncertainty in long-term supply commitments and pricing strategies.

In the absence of a specified duration, assume a standard framework agreement term (e.g., 2-4 years) for pricing calculations. Clearly state assumptions made regarding contract duration in the bid.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A pharmaceutical supplier with a strong track record in supplying contrast agents to healthcare institutions, possessing a competitive pricing structure for 'joheksool', and a demonstrably secure and compliant supply chain free from Russian Federation connections. Experience with framework agreements for pharmacy goods would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Offer contrast agents with precisely defined technical specifications and quantities, or equivalent products.
Lowest price for the drug joheksool (solution for injection) will receive the maximum score.
Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Submission of a completed technical proposal.
Submission of a completed unit price table for contrast agents.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably superior cost-efficiency for 'joheksool' through optimized sourcing or manufacturing.
Proactive and transparent communication regarding supply chain integrity and compliance with exclusion grounds.
Exceptional technical documentation and support for offered contrast agents, even if equivalents.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a statement on ethical sourcing and labor practices within the supply chain, even if not a formal evaluation point. This can subtly enhance the bidder's profile.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of joheksool (solution for injection)Maximum Score for Lowest Price

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify opportunities for price reduction. Leverage bulk purchasing, efficient logistics, and direct sourcing where possible. Clearly present the unit price table to facilitate easy comparison.

Technical Specifications and EquivalentsN/A (assumed critical for compliance)

Meticulously match all specified technical requirements. For any offered equivalents, provide comprehensive justification, including efficacy, safety, and compatibility data, referencing relevant regulatory approvals.

Exclusion Grounds (Russian Federation)N/A (mandatory)

Provide unequivocal confirmation of compliance. Detail the due diligence process undertaken to ensure no subcontractors or suppliers are connected to the Russian Federation. This should be a prominent section of the bid.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price 'Joheksool'
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis to determine the lowest sustainable price for 'joheksool'. Explore all avenues for cost reduction, including supply chain optimization and potential volume discounts.

Directly impacts the highest scoring evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Fortify Supply Chain Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Develop a clear and robust statement confirming the absence of Russian Federation-connected subcontractors and suppliers. Include details of due diligence processes and provide supporting documentation if possible.

Ensures mandatory compliance, preventing disqualification. Demonstrates reliability and risk mitigation.
Comprehensive Technical Proposal
HighHigh effort

Ensure the technical proposal meticulously addresses all specified technical requirements. For any offered equivalents, provide detailed justification and supporting evidence of equivalence.

Confirms technical capability and avoids potential disqualification on technical grounds.
Clarify Assumptions on Contract Duration
HighLow effort

In the absence of a specified duration, clearly state any assumptions made regarding the contract length in the bid submission. This provides transparency and manages expectations.

Reduces ambiguity and potential future disputes. Demonstrates foresight.
Highlight Supply Chain Transparency
MediumMed effort

Beyond just confirming compliance, proactively highlight the transparency and resilience of the bidder's supply chain, emphasizing ethical sourcing and risk management.

Builds trust and positions the bidder as a reliable long-term partner, even if not directly evaluated.
Prepare for 'Equivalent Product' Scrutiny
MediumMed effort

If offering equivalent products, ensure all supporting documentation (e.g., Certificates of Analysis, regulatory approvals, comparative studies) is readily available and well-organized for prompt submission if requested.

Facilitates a smooth evaluation process for equivalent products, preventing delays or disqualification.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider of 'joheksool' while maintaining impeccable supply chain integrity. Emphasize the absence of geopolitical risks associated with the supply chain.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a completed technical proposal.
--Bidders must submit a completed unit price table for contrast agents.
--Bidders must provide information regarding trade secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a completed application for participation in the tender.
--Bidders must confirm agreement with the terms and conditions of the tender documents.
--Bidders must confirm full consideration of their bid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must offer contrast agents with precisely defined technical specifications and quantities.
--Bidders must offer equivalent products if exact matches are not available.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated based on the total cost of the drug joheksool (solution for injection).
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304654_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 76.9 KB

The bidder must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation in the contract execution and must provide information regarding trade secrets.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud hankemenetluses osalemise avalduseDOC
304654 Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus.docx -- 50.8 KB

The bidder must submit a completed application to participate in the procurement procedure, confirming agreement with the tender document conditions and full consideration in the bid.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud tabeli "304654 Tehniline ettepanek ühikuhinnad"XLS
304654 Tehniline ettepanek ühikuhinnad.xlsx -- 30.4 KB

Bidders must submit a completed technical proposal and unit price table for the contrast media tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304654_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 24.3 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the total cost of the drug ioxol (solution for injection), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304654_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 68.5 KB

This tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format for expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Lepingu projektDOC
304654 Apteegikauba riigihanke raamleping.doc... -- 54.5 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for the public procurement of pharmacy goods, outlining the rights and obligations of the buyer and seller, as well as the purpose and object of the contract, including terms for the supply of medicines.

Tehniline kirjeldusXLS
304654 Tehniline kirjeldus.xlsx -- 25.5 KB

The contracting authority Põhja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla is seeking contrast agents with precisely defined technical specifications and quantities, requiring the offer of equivalent products.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for contrast agents is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The exclusion of Russian-connected entities is a specific but permissible requirement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined. Document summaries provide good insight into the expected submissions, although the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a notable omission.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not specified, and while documents are attached, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria reduces overall completeness.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and criteria, while not fully detailed for evaluation, are generally objective. The exclusion of Russian-connected entities is a specific geopolitical requirement, not necessarily unfair in this context.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. However, the absence of a specified contract start date and the lack of explicit financing information reduce practicality. The duration of the contract is also missing.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is clearly indicated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these sustainability elements.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
E-submission and e-procurement enabled
Reasonable submission deadline
Estimated value disclosed

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Include contract duration and start date.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline